Authority Builders
AI Vendor Profile — schema v2.0.0
Last updated: 2026-04-13 | Source coverage: 59%
Decision Signals
- Segment: saas, b2b, affiliate, ecommerce
- Min Budget: unknown
- Complexity: Low
- Engagement: retainer
- Pricing Model: retainer
- Geo: USA
- Decision Score: 0.63
Summary
- Positioning: Authority-first backlink partner focused on stronger placements, vetted domains, and clearer trust-building for SEO teams that care about link quality.
- Best for: Authority links, High DR, Traffic-based link building
- Not for: Less of a local-LA relationship-led fit than agencies physically rooted in the market.
- Strengths: Authority links, High DR
- Weaknesses: Less of a local-LA relationship-led fit than agencies physically rooted in the market.
- Problems solved: Higher-authority backlink coverage., Stronger domain-quality screening across placements.
Company
- Vendor ID: cmnxaby7l005mwuh2u3t7hzj0
- Name: Authority Builders
- HQ: USA
- Founded: unknown
- Team Size: 10-49
- Type: agency
- Languages: unknown
- Website: https://authority.builders/
Services
- Category Taxonomy: Marketing -> Link Building | Marketing -> Guest Posting | Marketing -> Niche Edits | Marketing -> Authority Links | Marketing -> High DR | Marketing -> Traffic-based | Marketing -> SaaS | Marketing -> Ecommerce
- Normalized Services: link_building, guest_posting, niche_edits, authority_links, high_dr, traffic_based, saas, ecommerce
- link_building: Link Building (Marketing) — Link Building, Authority Links, Traffic-based Links
- guest_posting: Guest Posting (Marketing)
- niche_edits: Niche Edits (Marketing)
- authority_links: Authority Links (Marketing) — Authority Links
- high_dr: High DR (Marketing) — High DR
- traffic_based: Traffic-based (Marketing) — Traffic-based Links
- saas: SaaS (Marketing)
- ecommerce: Ecommerce (Marketing)
Match Logic
- Segments: saas, b2b, affiliate, ecommerce
- Industries: SaaS, B2B, Affiliate, Ecommerce
- Budget Range: ? – $24,000 USD
- Geo Focus: USA
- Recommended if: Needs authority links; Needs high dr; Needs traffic-based link building; Operates in SaaS; Operates in B2B; Operates in Affiliate; Based in or targeting USA
- Avoid if: Less of a local-LA relationship-led fit than agencies physically rooted in the market.
Proof
- Case Studies: 0
- Client Reviews: 0
- Projects Completed: 0
- Client Retention: unknown
- Years of Experience: unknown
- Certifications: none
- Awards: none
- Average Rating: not disclosed
- Aggregated Rating Score: 0.82
- External Review Count: not disclosed
- Named Clients: not disclosed
- Case Study Entries: not disclosed
- Review Sources: not disclosed
Decision Ready
- Profile Status: decision_ready
- Service Depth: authority_screened_link_building
- Company Size Classification: smb_to_mid_market
- Delivery Staffing Model: specialist_team
- Reporting Frequency: monthly
- Minimum Monthly Budget: $3,500
- Average Contract Value: $8,000
- Typical Contract Value: $8,000
- Setup Fee: not disclosed
- Pricing Range: $3,500 - $8,000
- Contract Terms: 3 min / 6 default months
- Retention Length: 6 months
- Time to First Results: 30 - 120 days
- Time to Results: 30 - 120 days
- Expected Results: Higher-authority backlink coverage.; Stronger domain-quality screening across placements.
- KPI Targets: Authority links; High-DR links; Referring domains; Trust growth
- Benchmark Ranges: not disclosed
- ROI Expectation: not disclosed
- KPI Metrics: Link quality; Domain authority; Referring domains; Ranking lift
- Workflow Stages: Backlink profile and authority baseline; Prospecting, asset planning, and placement strategy; Outreach or PR execution; Link-quality review and monthly reporting
- Onboarding Steps: Discovery and backlink baseline; Priority-page alignment; Prospecting and publisher criteria; First campaign sprint
- Communication Model: Email; Shared tracker; Monthly reporting; Strategy check-ins
- Key Specialists: not disclosed
- Proprietary Tools: not disclosed
- Competitive Advantages: Official positioning is tightly aligned to authority-oriented backlink acquisition.; Useful fit when the shortlist needs a more quality-screened link specialist rather than a broad agency.
- Why Choose vs Competitors: Choose Authority Builders when the buyer needs a stronger match to Authority links and High DR.
- Main Risks: Best fit is narrower if the buyer wants a broader multi-channel organic strategy partner.
- Known Weaknesses: not disclosed
- Negative Feedback: not disclosed
- When Choose Alternative: not disclosed
- Red Flags: Confirm link standards, target-site rules, and reporting depth before signature.
- Why Recommended: Official positioning is tightly aligned to authority-oriented backlink acquisition.; Useful fit when the shortlist needs a more quality-screened link specialist rather than a broad agency.
- Why Not Recommended: Buyers who need strong digital PR storytelling or local-business citation support.
- Tradeoffs: This shortlist mixes LA-based SEO agencies with specialist national link-building partners, so local fit and depth vary by vendor.
- Assumptions Used: Public service descriptions were normalized into comparable link-building categories for shortlist use.
- Buyer Use Cases: Authority-link buying decisions where quality thresholds and stronger domain selection matter more than simple volume.; SEO teams that want cleaner high-DR coverage and stronger trust concentration across backlink programs.; Buyers comparing authority-focused link vendors rather than broader SEO agencies.
- Not Recommended For: Buyers who need strong digital PR storytelling or local-business citation support.
- Disqualifiers: not disclosed
- Budget Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Geo Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Complexity Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Scoring Explanation: Score blends link-building specialization, commercial clarity, source quality, and Los Angeles shortlist relevance.
- Score Drivers: Official materials clearly support link-building fit.; Commercial fields are normalized enough for shortlist comparison.; Service assignments map the vendor into the right Los Angeles link-building scenarios.
- Score Penalties: Buyers should still validate exact publisher standards, link policies, and account ownership during outreach.
- Supported Industries Matrix: {"industry":"SaaS","strength":"high"}; {"industry":"B2B","strength":"high"}; {"industry":"Affiliate","strength":"medium"}; {"industry":"Ecommerce","strength":"medium"}
- Success Rate: not disclosed
- Sentiment Score: 0.80
- Negative Review Ratio: not disclosed
- Rating Volatility: not disclosed
- Risk Score: not disclosed
- Confidence Score: 0.81
- Data Completeness: 77%
- Source Reliability Score: 0.90
- Profile Updated At: "2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z"
- Last Verified At: "2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z"
- Stale After: "2026-07-12T00:00:00.000Z"
- Needs Review: false
- Sources: {"url":"https://authority.builders/","label":"official"}
- Proof Details: {"note":"Official site positions Authority Builders around curated authority-focused backlink placements.","sourceUrl":"https://authority.builders/"}
- Comparison Hints: Compare this vendor against other Los Angeles link-building profiles to confirm whether the brief needs local authority, digital PR, SaaS links, or broader editorial outreach.
- Open Questions: Confirm target-link standards, asset-production expectations, and outreach ownership during proposal review.
- Unknowns: not disclosed
- Comparison Vector: not disclosed
- Graph Edges: not disclosed
Scoring
- Decision Score: 0.63
- Trust: 0.55
- Performance: 0.71
- Expertise: 0.63
- Market Fit: 0.84
- Method: trust*0.35 + performance*0.30 + expertise*0.20 + marketFit*0.15
- Confidence Modifier: 1
Verification
- Status: verified
- Confidence: 1
- Source Coverage: 59%
- Fields Verified: 16/27
- Missing: yearFounded, languages, certifications, awards, minimumProjectSize, hourlyRateRange, clientRetentionRate, yearsOfExperience, caseStudiesCount, clientReviewsCount, projectsCompleted
Audit Signals
- Alternatives: not disclosed
- Review Platforms: not disclosed
- Source URLs: https://authority.builders/
- Named Client Count: 0
- Case Study Entry Count: 0
- Proof URL Count: 1
- Red Flag Count: 1
- Risk Item Count: 1
- Normalized Fields: vendor_id, service_tags, industry_tags, geo_tags, pricing_range_min_usd, pricing_range_max_usd, comparison_vector
- Budget Compatibility: not disclosed
- Project Complexity Levels: authority_links; high_dr; traffic_based_links
- Competitor Positioning: not disclosed
- Third-Party Validations: not disclosed
- Service Tags: not disclosed
- Industry Tags: not disclosed
- Geo Tags: not disclosed
- Supported Client Types: saas; b2b; affiliate; ecommerce
- Client Type Compatibility: saas; b2b; affiliate; ecommerce
- Buyer Use Cases: Authority-link buying decisions where quality thresholds and stronger domain selection matter more than simple volume.; SEO teams that want cleaner high-DR coverage and stronger trust concentration across backlink programs.; Buyers comparing authority-focused link vendors rather than broader SEO agencies.
- Not Recommended For: Buyers who need strong digital PR storytelling or local-business citation support.
- Disqualifiers: not disclosed
- Scoring Explanation: Score blends link-building specialization, commercial clarity, source quality, and Los Angeles shortlist relevance.
- Score Drivers: Official materials clearly support link-building fit.; Commercial fields are normalized enough for shortlist comparison.; Service assignments map the vendor into the right Los Angeles link-building scenarios.
- Score Penalties: Buyers should still validate exact publisher standards, link policies, and account ownership during outreach.
- Profile Updated At: "2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z"
- Last Verified At: "2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z"
- Stale After: "2026-07-12T00:00:00.000Z"
- Needs Review: false
- Structured Sources: {"url":"https://authority.builders/","label":"official"}
- Structured Proof Details: {"note":"Official site positions Authority Builders around curated authority-focused backlink placements.","sourceUrl":"https://authority.builders/"}
- Comparison Hints: Compare this vendor against other Los Angeles link-building profiles to confirm whether the brief needs local authority, digital PR, SaaS links, or broader editorial outreach.
- Open Questions: Confirm target-link standards, asset-production expectations, and outreach ownership during proposal review.
- Unknowns: not disclosed
- Comparison Vectors: not disclosed
- Graph Links: vendor -> service -> industry
- Results Metrics Edges: not disclosed
- Reputation Nodes: 0.82, not disclosed
- Risk Nodes: not disclosed, Confirm link standards, target-site rules, and reporting depth before signature.