DASH TWO
agencyLos Angeles, CA, USA10-49Los Angeles, California, USA
Los Angeles paid media shop blending social advertising, creator ecosystems, and performance-oriented media buying for larger campaigns.
Paid AdsMeta AdsTikTok AdsPerformance PPC
Best for
- Paid social
- Media buying
- Scaled customer acquisition
Commercial fit
Entry point
Not disclosed
Budget not disclosed
Ask for a pricing estimate before discovery call
Delivery confidence
Not disclosed
Retention signal missing
Skip if
- Service fit depends on budget
- channel mix
Verdict: Strong in paid social
Jump to decision summary71/100
Audit-based ranking score
Developing
Use this as a shortlist candidate, not a final answer, until the missing proof and fit fields are tightened.
Mixed consistency
What's holding the score back
Add benchmark ranges or benchmark comparison fields.
+2 more items need attention
Buyer-facing summary
Decision Summary
The fastest read on fit, risks, and data quality before deeper vendor review.
Score
71/100
Status
Early shortlist
Confidence
84%
Completeness
89%
Fast verdict
Useful as an early shortlist candidate.
Primary signals: Official site clearly supports the service fit and Profile includes enough structured data for shortlist comparison.
Validate carefully if your process depends on Very low-budget briefs that need freelancer-style support only.
Fit signal
Why shortlist
- Official site clearly supports the service fit.
- Profile includes enough structured data for shortlist comparison.
Risk signal
Watch-outs
- Very low-budget briefs that need freelancer-style support only.
Buyer path
Best use cases
- Los Angeles buyers looking for paid social, media buying, scaled customer acquisition.
Deeper decision notes
Not recommended for
- Very low-budget briefs that need freelancer-style support only.
Disqualifiers
Hard disqualifiers are not documented yet.
Comparison hints
- Compare this profile against other Los Angeles vendors in the same service family to confirm budget fit, channel depth, and local-market relevance.
Open questions
- Which media-buying fees, production costs, and ad spend are included in quoted campaign budgets?
- Can the vendor provide post-campaign performance reports for the buyer's target channel mix?
Reliability
85%
Last verified
April 27, 2026
Freshness
July 26, 2026
Score blockers
- Add benchmark ranges or benchmark comparison fields.
- Add ROI expectation or payback logic.
- Add media mentions or community mentions.
- Add a negative feedback summary.
Fit Assessment
Explicit conditions for shortlisting or eliminating this vendor.
Shortlist this vendor if
- You need paid social
- You need media buying
- You need scaled customer acquisition
- You want to stronger demand capture.
- You want to better commercial visibility.
- Your company is: consumer, retail, gaming, Mid-Market Companies
- You operate in Los Angeles, California, USA
Skip this vendor if
- Service fit depends on budget
- channel mix
- and delivery model.
- You require coverage outside of Los Angeles, California, USA
Pricing signal
Pricing & Commercial Model
Understand entry point, commercial structure, and whether outreach needs manual pricing verification.
Clarity
Public signals found
Entry point is From $12K/mo.
Commercial model is retainer.
Hourly pricing is not disclosed.
Minimum Budget
$12,000
per month
Typical Project
$28,000
total value
Hourly Rate
Not disclosed
per hour
Pricing Model
Retainer
retainer, project
Budget Segment Fit
Where this vendor appears to land based on visible monthly pricing.
From $12K/mo
Startup
<$3K/mo
SMB
$3-10K/mo
Mid-Market
$10-25K/mo
Best fit
Visible pricing signals place this vendor most naturally in this budget range.
Enterprise
$25K+/mo
Company Snapshot
Background and operating context.
fact inferred unknown
Founded
Unknown
Team Size
10-49
Type
Agency
HQ
Los Angeles
Experience
Unknown
Retention
Unknown
Projects
Unknown
Reviews
Unknown
Geo Coverage
Los AngelesCaliforniaUSA
Ideal Client Profile
Supporting context on buyer types and problem space.
Client Types
consumer
retail
gaming
Mid-Market Companies
Industry Experience
EntertainmentConsumerRetailGaming
Problems They Solve
Stronger demand capture.
Better commercial visibility.
Services & Capabilities
Full service breadth and tools, beyond the primary decision layer.
Services & Capabilities
What this vendor delivers and how they deliver it.
Marketing
Paid Ads
Meta Ads
TikTok Ads
Performance PPC
$50k+
Performance Marketing
Customer Acquisition
Attribution / Analytics
Agencies with Proven Results
Community Marketing
Reddit Marketing
Discord Marketing
Telegram Marketing
Facebook Groups
Community Seeding
Brand Mentions
Discussion Management
Organic Community Growth
Skills
Paid AdsPerformance MarketingMeta AdsTikTok AdsMedia Buying
Decision-Ready Metadata
Structured support data used for moderation, buyer review, and AI extraction.
Pricing & Commercials
Minimum budget / entry point
$12,000 per month
Typical contract size
$28,000
Pricing range
$12,000 to $28,000
Setup fees
Setup fees not disclosed.
Contract length
3 month minimum term
Exit conditions
Not disclosed
Value & Outcome
Expected results
Stronger demand capture.; Better commercial visibility.
Time to first results
30-120 days
KPI focus
Paid social; Media buying; Scaled customer acquisition
Benchmarks / performance ranges
Not disclosed
ROI expectation / payback logic
Not disclosed
Proof, Trust & Reputation
Named clients
SoFi Stadium; SHEGLAM; Jimmy Kimmel LA Bowl; Revolt TV; Lucky Lager; Off-White
Portfolio / links to work
https://dashtwo.com/; https://dashtwo.com/new-case-study-archive-page-backend/; https://dashtwo.com/casestudy/sofi-stadium-digital-advertising-case-study/; https://dashtwo.com/casestudy/sheglam-engagement-marketing-case-study/; https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/news/accesswire/dash-two-spotlights-top-100-wild-posting-campaigns-in-the-last-15-years
Third-party validation
Accesswire/Digital Journal press coverage; Official case-study archive; Official SoFi Stadium and SHEGLAM case studies; Official Clutch award article; Rating Captain public review page
External reviews
url: https://dashtwo.com/blog/dash-two-on-clutch-2018-top-agencies/; notes: Official award/leader-matrix context is not a current verified buyer-review count.; source: Official Clutch award article; status: public_or_directory_signal_not_verified_buyer_proof; verifiedReviewCount: 0; url: https://reviews.ratingcaptain.com/630444/dashtwo-com; notes: Public review-profile context is not counted as verified B2B buyer proof.; source: Rating Captain; status: public_or_directory_signal_not_verified_buyer_proof; verifiedReviewCount: 0
Average rating and review volume
?/5 across 0 reviews
Mentions in media or communities
Not disclosed
Negative feedback summary
Not disclosed
Controversies / risks
Exact scope, staffing, and reporting should still be validated during outreach.
Process, Team & Differentiation
Workflow
Discovery and commercial fit review; Channel or SEO baseline; Execution sprint and reporting; Optimization and next-step planning
Onboarding process
Initial discovery; Offer and channel review; Tracking and scope alignment; First-month plan
Communication model
Email; Reporting deck; Strategy call
Reporting frequency
monthly
SLA / guarantees
Not disclosed
Key specialists
Not disclosed
Seniority level
Not disclosed
In-house vs outsourcing
specialist_team
Unique selling proposition
Los Angeles paid media shop blending social advertising, creator ecosystems, and performance-oriented media buying for larger campaigns.
Proprietary tools
Not disclosed
Competitive advantages
Official site clearly supports the service fit.; Profile includes enough structured data for shortlist comparison.
Why choose them vs competitors
Choose DASH TWO when the shortlist needs a stronger fit for Paid social and Media buying.
Fit, Risk & Alternatives
ICP / customer profile
consumer, retail, gaming, Mid-Market Companies
Industry strength
Entertainment; Consumer; Retail; Gaming
Use cases
Stronger demand capture.; Better commercial visibility.
Buyer use cases
Los Angeles buyers looking for paid social, media buying, scaled customer acquisition.
Not recommended for
Very low-budget briefs that need freelancer-style support only.
Disqualifiers
Not disclosed
Budget thresholds
Not disclosed
Complexity thresholds
Not disclosed
Budget mismatch rules
Not disclosed
Geo mismatch rules
Not disclosed
Complexity mismatch rules
Not disclosed
Main risks
Exact scope, staffing, and reporting should still be validated during outreach.
Known weaknesses
No strong independent review directory profile was found in this pass, so proof is case-study and press driven.; Best fit appears to be outdoor, guerilla, and digital advertising campaigns rather than pure SEO or ORM.
Dependency risks
Not disclosed
Overpromising signals
Not disclosed
Similar vendors
Not disclosed
When to choose an alternative
Not disclosed
Comparison hints
Compare this profile against other Los Angeles vendors in the same service family to confirm budget fit, channel depth, and local-market relevance.
Positioning vs competitors
Not disclosed
Decision Metadata
Confidence score
0.84
Data completeness %
89%
Last updated timestamp
April 25, 2026
Profile updated at
April 27, 2026
Last verified at
April 27, 2026
Stale after
July 26, 2026
Needs review
No
Source reliability score
0.85
Scoring explanation
Score blends source reliability, completeness, commercial clarity, and live-listing relevance.
Score drivers
Official-service proof is present.; Core commercial fields are normalized.; Los Angeles service-region fit is explicit.; OOH/media-buying award context.
Score penalties
Buyers should still confirm exact staffing model, media ownership, and scope detail.; Award context is not review depth.
Why recommended
Official site clearly supports the service fit.; Profile includes enough structured data for shortlist comparison.
Why not recommended
Very low-budget briefs that need freelancer-style support only.
Trade-offs
This vendor may be stronger in some categories than others, so scenario-specific fit still matters.
Assumptions used
Public official-site positioning was normalized into comparable marketing-service categories.
Sources
url: https://dashtwo.com/; type: official_site; label: DASH TWO official site; observedAt: 2026-04-25; url: https://dashtwo.com/new-case-study-archive-page-backend/; type: official_case_studies; label: DASH TWO case-study archive; observedAt: 2026-04-25; url: https://dashtwo.com/casestudy/sofi-stadium-digital-advertising-case-study/; type: official_case_study; label: SoFi Stadium digital advertising case study; observedAt: 2026-04-25; url: https://dashtwo.com/casestudy/sheglam-engagement-marketing-case-study/; type: official_case_study; label: SHEGLAM engagement marketing case study; observedAt: 2026-04-25; url: https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/news/accesswire/dash-two-spotlights-top-100-wild-posting-campaigns-in-the-last-15-years; type: press_mention; label: Accesswire/Digital Journal milestone coverage; observedAt: 2026-04-25; url: https://dashtwo.com/blog/dash-two-on-clutch-2018-top-agencies/; type: official_award; label: DASH TWO Clutch award article; observedAt: 2026-04-27
Proof details
type: official_case_study_archive; summary: Official case-study archive positions DASH TWO around outdoor advertising and digital advertising for emerging brands, customized media strategy, ROI, conversions, and creative media buying.; sourceUrl: https://dashtwo.com/new-case-study-archive-page-backend/; type: official_case_study; summary: SoFi Stadium case study reports a campaign across Facebook, Instagram, Google, and Hulu for the Jimmy Kimmel LA Bowl, with estimated impressions, conversion value, and ticket-sales lift.; sourceUrl: https://dashtwo.com/casestudy/sofi-stadium-digital-advertising-case-study/; type: official_case_study; summary: SHEGLAM case study covers a Melrose pop-up using wild posting, wall projections, chalk stencils, digital trucks, and doubledecker bus media, with impression counts and execution constraints.; sourceUrl: https://dashtwo.com/casestudy/sheglam-engagement-marketing-case-study/; type: press_mention; summary: Accesswire/Digital Journal coverage describes DASH TWO as an Inglewood media buying agency with 15 years of Wild Posting campaign experience.; sourceUrl: https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/news/accesswire/dash-two-spotlights-top-100-wild-posting-campaigns-in-the-last-15-years; type: verification_correction; summary: DASH TWO has official Clutch award context, but no qualifying current 5+ verified buyer-review source was found in this pass.; sourceUrl: https://dashtwo.com/blog/dash-two-on-clutch-2018-top-agencies/; observedAt: 2026-04-27
Open questions
Which media-buying fees, production costs, and ad spend are included in quoted campaign budgets?; Can the vendor provide post-campaign performance reports for the buyer's target channel mix?
Unknowns
Not disclosed
Normalized fields across vendors
service tags: Paid Ads; Meta Ads; TikTok Ads; Performance PPC; $50k+; Performance Marketing; Customer Acquisition; Attribution / Analytics; Agencies with Proven Results; Community Marketing; Reddit Marketing; Discord Marketing; Telegram Marketing; Facebook Groups; Community Seeding; Brand Mentions; Discussion Management; Organic Community Growth; industry tags: Entertainment; Consumer; Retail; Gaming; geo tags: Los Angeles; California; USA
Comparison vectors
Not disclosed
Graph compatibility
Not disclosed
Audit & Formula
Supporting audit detail behind the visible ranking score. Useful for moderation and deeper review, but not part of the first-screen decision layer.
Formula
(68 Human + 74 AI) / 2
Equal weight keeps ranking honest: the profile has to work for buyers and for machines.
How scoring worksChecklist audit
Human Audit
68/100
34 found, 14 missing
AI Audit
74/100
36 found, 10 missing
Main gaps behind this score
- Add benchmark ranges or benchmark comparison fields.
- Add ROI expectation or payback logic.
- Add media mentions or community mentions.
- Add a negative feedback summary.
Process & Delivery
Supporting delivery context for deeper review.
Engagement Models
Retainer
Project
Strengths, Weaknesses & Trade-offs
Supporting interpretation layer for deeper review.
Strengths
- Paid social
- Media buying
- Scaled customer acquisition
Weaknesses
- Service fit depends on budget
- channel mix
- and delivery model.
Trade-offseditorial assessment
- High specialisation — strong depth in core area, limited breadth across adjacent services.
- No formal partner certifications on record — capability claims are not third-party validated.
- Retainer-based model — favours ongoing relationships, less suited to one-off projects.
How to read this evidence
Visible proof is still thin, so this section should be treated cautiously.
There are no linked case studies yet, so deeper proof still needs manual verification.
Case Study Results
SoFi Stadium digital advertising campaign · https://dashtwo.com/casestudy/sofi-stadium-digital-advertising-case-study/
SHEGLAM Melrose pop-up guerilla media campaign · https://dashtwo.com/casestudy/sheglam-engagement-marketing-case-study/
Top 100 Wild Posting campaigns milestone · https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/news/accesswire/dash-two-spotlights-top-100-wild-posting-campaigns-in-the-last-15-years
Named Clients
SoFi StadiumSHEGLAMJimmy Kimmel LA BowlRevolt TVLucky LagerOff-White
8
Case Studies
Moderate
None
Client Reviews
Limited
Unknown
Projects Completed
Early stage
Unknown
Client Retention
Unknown
Industries Served
EntertainmentConsumerRetailGaming
Negotiation checklist for DASH TWO5 points
Use these before signing. Each point addresses a known pattern for vendors at this tier and size.
Ask for a 3-month pilot with explicit exit conditions before committing to a longer term — most agencies at this level will agree if scope is well-defined.
Benchmark the retainer cost against two alternatives before accepting the first proposal — agencies at this budget tier typically have 15–25% pricing flexibility for well-scoped accounts.
Define month-1 deliverables explicitly in writing — retainer agreements are often left intentionally vague, which causes scope disputes after the 60-day honeymoon period.
Get a named account manager in the contract, not just a team. Request an SLA on response time (e.g. 24-hour business-day response) — verbal commitments don't hold after onboarding.
Ask for two references from clients in your specific industry vertical, not generic testimonials from a published library — call them directly and ask about communication and post-launch support.
Comparison paths
Alternatives to Consider
Nearby vendors to open when this profile is close, but budget, proof, or fit needs a second path.
Shared service fit
74/100
Matches on Paid Ads and Performance Marketing.
Coalition Technologies
Los Angeles SEO agency with dedicated local SEO and ecommerce search services.
74/100
Better if you need
- Los Angeles SEO
- Ecommerce SEO
Overlap signals
Paid AdsPerformance MarketingRetail
Entry pointFrom $1,000/mo
Open profile
Shared service fit
74/100
Matches on Paid Ads and Performance Marketing.
Canesta
Los Angeles digital marketing agency with SEO, local SEO, and ecommerce SEO services.
74/100
Better if you need
- Ecommerce SEO
- Local SEO
Overlap signals
Paid AdsPerformance MarketingRetail
Entry pointFrom $1,500/mo
Open profile
Shared service fit
79/100
Matches on Paid Ads and Performance Marketing.
Single Grain
Los Angeles growth agency with SEO, content, and demand-generation relevance for B2B and SaaS teams.
79/100
Better if you need
- B2B / SaaS
- Content-led SEO
Overlap signals
Paid AdsPerformance MarketingCommunity MarketingReddit Marketing
Entry pointBudget not disclosed
Open profile
Shortlist decision
Final Verdict
The buyer-facing call before outreach: shortlist, compare, or hold for verification.
Compare before outreach
71/100 decision score
Use this vendor as a comparison path first, then decide whether it belongs in the final shortlist.
DASH TWO is a agency best evaluated for paid social and media buying.
71/100
GoodBudget floor
Not disclosed
Risk status
No major flags
Shortlist if
- Paid social
- Media buying
- Scaled customer acquisition
Skip if
- Service fit depends on budget
- channel mix
- and delivery model.
Main trade-off
- High specialisation — strong depth in core area, limited breadth across adjacent services.
- No formal partner certifications on record — capability claims are not third-party validated.
- Retainer-based model — favours ongoing relationships, less suited to one-off projects.
Next action
Route a buyer, compare this profile, or open the AI-readable version for deeper review.