Back to the FUZE profile

FUZE: all proof and data on file

Every case, review and source Vendar holds, grouped by need. Filter by need, by work done, or by items checked against their source.

All proof on file

Every proof item on file for FUZE: who said it, where and when.

2 of 2
2
proof items on file
1
from outside sources
1
describe work done
1
include a number
Who is speaking
outside sources 1the agency 1
What it says
work done 1services offered 1
Proof by need
outside / all

No proof matches a published need yet.

Sources
2 sites
  • fuzedigital.com1
  • fuzeinc.com1

Other work done

1

Cases and reviews outside the needs Vendar ranks

    • FUZE executed a multi-channel digital marketing campaign for Life After Denim. The page reports a 250% increase in lifetime sales, a 325% increase in site traffic, and a 275% increase in AOV; it does not state when these results occurred.

      agency's own wordsfuzeinc.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026
      year of result not statedopen source
      show the quote
      FUZE was asked to execute a multi-channel digital marketing campaign, which dramatically increased online sales and revenue. + 250% increase in lifetime sales + 325% increase in site traffic + 275% increase in AOV

Recognition from outside

1

Awards, certifications, media

    • FUZE published an independent product review of Fuze Suite 8.0 by former Gartner analyst and ThinkJar founder Esteban Kolsky. Kolsky concluded that the product was worth evaluation when looking for a social business platform. The release was dated April 14, 2011.

      outside sourcecheckedfuzedigital.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026
      result from 2011, older than 3 yearsopen source
      show the quote
      SEATTLE, April 14, 2011 - FuzeDigital today published an independent product review of its recently-launched Fuze Suite(tm) 8.0 release by former Gartner analyst and founder of ThinkJar Esteban Kolsky . In his analysis, Kolsky concluded that the Fuze Suite 8.0 "is definitely worth evaluation and enhanced consideration when looking for a social business platform ."

Reviews from platforms that compete with Vendar are counted, but not linked; their sources are kept on file.

About the data

How complete and trustworthy this profile is

What stands behind the numbers, what is not collected yet, the AI feed, and how to correct the page.

How the two profile scores are computed
Data completeness30/100
  • Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served10/20

    founding year, team size, logo

  • Fit: services, industries, client types15/15

    complete

  • Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20

    model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee

  • Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10)5/30

    1 cases with a named client and a result, 1 work claims

  • Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews0/15

    0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews

Trust in the data70/100
  • Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%)0/30

    0 of 1 work claims are independent

  • Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed25/25

    2 confirmed, 0 partly, of 2 with a source

  • Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source20/20

    1 of 1

  • Seen within the last 365 days15/15

    2 of 2

  • Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports10/10

    0 not supported by their page

Last verified
n/a
Re-check due
Feb 1, 2027

The large number at the top is the score of the vendor's best position in a ranking: the number that orders it on that list. These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position. Rules: how Vendar ranks.

Not collected yet

The collector adds these as its passes come online. Until then they are gaps, not zeros.

  • Cross-source consistency

    Team size, founding year, address and prices compared across the site, LinkedIn, directories and registries. Arrives with the collector's evidence pass.

  • Change history

    What changed on the profile and how the score moved per question, with the model version. Arrives with the monthly fast pass.

  • Case quality grades

    Client specificity, baseline and result, scale, causality and verifiability graded 0 to 3 with quotes. Arrives with ranking model 2026.11 after calibration.

  • Measurements and buyer reports

    Speed and uptime of delivered sites, visibility of named clients, response time to a quote request, and what buyers report 30 and 90 days after a shortlist.

For AI assistants

The same facts, limits and citations are served as JSON. Readiness: candidate_only_with_caveat.

/ai/vendors/fuze
Required caveats
  • None of the 1 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
  • Fewer than three external evidence claims are normalized.
  • Only one third-party evidence claim is normalized.
Do not infer
  • Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
  • Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
  • Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Corrections and right of reply

FUZE can dispute any claim on this page or add evidence. Submitted evidence is recorded as claimed until Vendar checks it, and the dispute and its resolution stay on the profile. Buyers who spot an error can report it the same way.

Submit a correction or evidence

Paid visibility never changes the content or the order of this page. Where a vendor has an active package it is disclosed below.