Go Fish Digital
AI Vendor Profile — schema v2.0.0
Last updated: 2026-03-16 | Source coverage: 100%
Decision Signals
- Segment: smb, mid_market
- Min Budget: $3,000+/mo
- Complexity: Medium
- Engagement: retainer
- Pricing Model: retainer
- Geo: USA
- Decision Score: 0.42
Summary
- Positioning: Creative digital marketing agency combining SEO, content, and link building
- Best for: Creative link building, Digital PR, Content-driven campaigns
- Not for: Smaller agency, Creative-focused — less technical depth, US market
- Strengths: Creative link building, Digital PR, 1 certifications, 19 years experience
- Weaknesses: Smaller agency, Creative-focused — less technical depth, US market
- Problems solved: Earn editorial links at scale, Create viral content campaigns, Build online reputation through digital PR
Company
- Vendor ID: cmmtswk16006bhqk2fx6tgnep
- Name: Go Fish Digital
- HQ: Raleigh, USA
- Founded: 2005
- Team Size: 20-50
- Type: agency
- Languages: English
- Website: https://gofishdigital.com
Services
- Category Taxonomy: Marketing -> SEO | Marketing -> Content Marketing | Marketing -> PPC
- Normalized Services: seo, content_marketing, ppc
- seo: SEO (Marketing) — SEO
- content_marketing: Content Marketing (Marketing) — Content Marketing
- ppc: PPC (Marketing)
Match Logic
- Segments: smb, mid_market
- Industries: SaaS, Ecommerce, Education, Real Estate
- Budget Range: $3,000 – $45,000 USD
- Geo Focus: USA
- Recommended if: Needs creative link building; Needs digital pr; Needs content-driven campaigns; Operates in SaaS; Operates in Ecommerce; Operates in Education; Budget >= $3000/month; Based in or targeting USA
- Avoid if: Smaller agency; Creative-focused — less technical depth; US market
Proof
- Case Studies: 20
- Client Reviews: 70
- Projects Completed: 250
- Client Retention: 77%
- Years of Experience: 19
- Certifications: Google Partner
- Awards: US Search Awards Finalist, Content Marketing Award
- Average Rating: not disclosed
- Aggregated Rating Score: not disclosed
- External Review Count: not disclosed
- Named Clients: not disclosed
- Case Study Entries: {"note":"Structured from imported aggregate case-study counts; source-by-source normalization still needed.","type":"case_study_aggregate","count":20,"source":"scraper","normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z","serviceScope":["SEO","Content Marketing","PPC"]}
- Review Sources: {"note":"Structured from imported review totals; original public review platforms still need normalization.","type":"aggregate_review_count","source":"scraper","reviewCount":70,"normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}
Decision Ready
- Profile Status: draft
- Service Depth: not disclosed
- Company Size Classification: not disclosed
- Delivery Staffing Model: not disclosed
- Reporting Frequency: not disclosed
- Minimum Monthly Budget: $3,000
- Average Contract Value: $15,000
- Typical Contract Value: $15,000
- Setup Fee: not disclosed
- Pricing Range: $3,000 - $15,000
- Contract Terms: 3 min / 6 default months
- Retention Length: not disclosed months
- Time to First Results: not disclosed - not disclosed days
- Time to Results: not disclosed - not disclosed days
- Expected Results: not disclosed
- KPI Targets: not disclosed
- Benchmark Ranges: not disclosed
- ROI Expectation: not disclosed
- KPI Metrics: not disclosed
- Workflow Stages: not disclosed
- Onboarding Steps: not disclosed
- Communication Model: not disclosed
- Key Specialists: not disclosed
- Proprietary Tools: not disclosed
- Competitive Advantages: not disclosed
- Why Choose vs Competitors: not disclosed
- Main Risks: May feel less specialized than a focused SEO boutique; Mid-sized agency model may offer less enterprise redundancy than larger operators
- Known Weaknesses: not disclosed
- Negative Feedback: not disclosed
- When Choose Alternative: not disclosed
- Red Flags: not disclosed
- Why Recommended: Good fit for buyers who want a flexible mid-sized partner spanning SEO, creative, and broader digital support; Useful when search work benefits from a mix of strategic, creative, and reputation-aware execution; A solid option for brands that want something more agile than a scaled agency but broader than a narrow specialist
- Why Not Recommended: not disclosed
- Tradeoffs: not disclosed
- Assumptions Used: minimumMonthlyBudgetUsd inferred from minimumProjectSize for retainer pricing until a monthly floor is explicitly verified.; typicalContractValueUsd inferred from averageProjectSize until contract value is directly verified.; pricingRangeMinUsd inferred from minimumProjectSize until a fuller range is verified.; pricingRangeMaxUsd inferred from averageProjectSize until a fuller range is verified.; contractMinMonths inferred from pricing model and engagement structure until an explicit contract term is verified.
- Buyer Use Cases: Flexible mid-market organic growth support; Search plus creative or digital brand work; Brands needing a more agile full-service-ish partner
- Not Recommended For: Enterprise buyers needing a highly formalized large-agency operating model; Teams wanting a pure technical SEO specialist above all else
- Disqualifiers: Need for enterprise-scale process and capacity beyond a mid-sized agency model; Need for a very narrow advanced technical SEO shop
- Budget Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Geo Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Complexity Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Scoring Explanation: not disclosed
- Score Drivers: not disclosed
- Score Penalties: not disclosed
- Supported Industries Matrix: not disclosed
- Success Rate: not disclosed
- Sentiment Score: not disclosed
- Negative Review Ratio: not disclosed
- Rating Volatility: not disclosed
- Risk Score: not disclosed
- Confidence Score: 0.53
- Data Completeness: 62%
- Source Reliability Score: 0.61
- Profile Updated At: "2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"
- Last Verified At: "2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"
- Stale After: "2026-05-23T10:14:34.305Z"
- Needs Review: false
- Sources: {"note":"Derived from existing imported vendor record.","field":"caseStudyEntries","source":"scraper","confidence":0.53,"evidenceType":"dataset_aggregate","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}; {"note":"Review totals exist on the vendor record; platform-level attribution pending.","field":"externalReviewSources","source":"scraper","confidence":0.53,"evidenceType":"dataset_aggregate","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}
- Proof Details: {"type":"case_study_aggregate","count":20,"source":"scraper","normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}; {"type":"review_aggregate","count":70,"source":"scraper","normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}
- Comparison Hints: {"bestComparedWith":["SmartSites","WebFX","other mid-sized digital agencies"],"alternativeForLowerBudget":["local SEO boutique","specialist contractor mix"]}
- Open Questions: Normalize named clients from public case studies if available.; Replace aggregate review source with named review platforms during editorial verification.
- Unknowns: not disclosed
- Comparison Vector: not disclosed
- Graph Edges: not disclosed
Scoring
- Decision Score: 0.42
- Trust: 0.39
- Performance: 0.45
- Expertise: 0.42
- Market Fit: 0.94
- Method: trust*0.35 + performance*0.30 + expertise*0.20 + marketFit*0.15
- Confidence Modifier: 0.7
Verification
- Status: unverified
- Confidence: 0.7
- Source Coverage: 100%
- Fields Verified: 27/27
Audit Signals
- Alternatives: not disclosed
- Review Platforms: scraper
- Source URLs: not disclosed
- Named Client Count: 0
- Case Study Entry Count: 1
- Proof URL Count: 0
- Red Flag Count: 0
- Risk Item Count: 2
- Normalized Fields: vendor_id, service_tags, industry_tags, geo_tags, pricing_range_min_usd, pricing_range_max_usd, comparison_vector
- Budget Compatibility: not disclosed
- Project Complexity Levels: not disclosed
- Competitor Positioning: not disclosed
- Third-Party Validations: not disclosed
- Service Tags: not disclosed
- Industry Tags: not disclosed
- Geo Tags: not disclosed
- Supported Client Types: not disclosed
- Client Type Compatibility: not disclosed
- Buyer Use Cases: Flexible mid-market organic growth support; Search plus creative or digital brand work; Brands needing a more agile full-service-ish partner
- Not Recommended For: Enterprise buyers needing a highly formalized large-agency operating model; Teams wanting a pure technical SEO specialist above all else
- Disqualifiers: Need for enterprise-scale process and capacity beyond a mid-sized agency model; Need for a very narrow advanced technical SEO shop
- Scoring Explanation: not disclosed
- Score Drivers: not disclosed
- Score Penalties: not disclosed
- Profile Updated At: "2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"
- Last Verified At: "2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"
- Stale After: "2026-05-23T10:14:34.305Z"
- Needs Review: false
- Structured Sources: {"note":"Derived from existing imported vendor record.","field":"caseStudyEntries","source":"scraper","confidence":0.53,"evidenceType":"dataset_aggregate","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}; {"note":"Review totals exist on the vendor record; platform-level attribution pending.","field":"externalReviewSources","source":"scraper","confidence":0.53,"evidenceType":"dataset_aggregate","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}
- Structured Proof Details: {"type":"case_study_aggregate","count":20,"source":"scraper","normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}; {"type":"review_aggregate","count":70,"source":"scraper","normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}
- Comparison Hints: {"bestComparedWith":["SmartSites","WebFX","other mid-sized digital agencies"],"alternativeForLowerBudget":["local SEO boutique","specialist contractor mix"]}
- Open Questions: Normalize named clients from public case studies if available.; Replace aggregate review source with named review platforms during editorial verification.
- Unknowns: not disclosed
- Comparison Vectors: not disclosed
- Graph Links: vendor -> service -> industry
- Results Metrics Edges: not disclosed
- Reputation Nodes: not disclosed, scraper
- Risk Nodes: not disclosed, not disclosed