High Top Digital: all proof and data on file
Every case, review and source Vendar holds, grouped by need. Filter by need, by work done, or by items checked against their source.
Every proof item on file for High Top Digital: who said it, where and when.
- SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget0/2
- SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer0/2
- SEO Agencies with an In-house Team0/2
- Local SEO0/1
- Content-led SEO0/1
- hightopdigital.com4
- google.com1
Nothing matches these filters.
SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget
2High Top Digital provided local SEO for PF Chang's, a nationwide casual dining restaurant, with a localized plan to improve keyword rankings, optimized localized landing pages, and new citations. The page reports an 883% increase in on-location visits and a 200% increase in location-based ranking visibility, with organic traffic continuing to outpace the previous year.
agency's own wordshightopdigital.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026year of result not statedLocal SEOSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerSEO Agencies with an In-house Teamopen sourceshow the quote
Our client's website has seen huge increases in organic site traffic and page 1 visibility since program inception and traffic continues to dramatically outpace the previous year. Organic visitors to the location pages continues to rise each month year-over-year. 883% Visitor Increase 883% Increase in on-location Visits. 200% Ranking Increase 200% location based ranking visibility.
High Top Digital provided SEO for E&J Gallo, aiming to increase organic site traffic and improve non-branded keyword rankings on Google's first page.
agency's own wordshightopdigital.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerSEO Agencies with an In-house Teamopen sourceshow the quote
Our client wanted to better compete on Google's first page for organic, non-branded search. As a strategic partner, we aimed to increase organic site traffic and improve non-branded keyword rankings.
Content-led SEO
1High Top Digital ran social advertising and content marketing for client Fit For Me around its sponsorship of Full Figured Fashion Week, managing social campaigns, Facebook Canvas ads, Snapchat geo filters, and brand ambassadors. The campaign produced 402,944 Facebook engagements, 346,765 people reached via Facebook Live, 27,894 Snapchat geo filter views, and a 1,088% year-over-year increase in Facebook event engagement and 188% year-over-year increase in Instagram event engagement.
agency's own wordshightopdigital.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026show the quote
Service: Social Advertising & Content Marketing Client: Fit For Me ... A total of 402,944 Facebook engagements occurred during the event, including 346,765 people reached during the Facebook Live streaming. Instagram saw more than 1,900 event engagements and gained 851 followers during the week-long event. Snaps with the Fit For Me branded geo filter were viewed 27,894 times. Ambassadors posted a total of 116 posts which were engaged with 51,459 times. 1,088% year-over-year increase in Facebook event engagement. 188% year-over-year increase in Instagram event engagement.
Other work done
1Cases and reviews outside the needs Vendar ranks
High Top Digital ran integrated paid media for Wyndham Vacation Rentals, optimizing paid search campaigns. The work increased ROAS by 295%, decreased net cost-per-sale by 75%, and increased click-through rate by 62% on paid search ads on Google and Bing.
agency's own wordshightopdigital.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026year of result not statedopen sourceshow the quote
Optimized budget allocation and decreased wasted spend increased ROAS by 295%. The improved relevance of ad copy to each keyword set contributed to improved quality scores, better average position, and lower CPCs, driving a 62% increase in CTR. Net cost-per-sale decreased 75%.
Services offered
1Service pages and pricing: what the agency sells, not what it has done
Source reference: google.com
outside sourcecheckedGoogle
Reviews from platforms that compete with Vendar are counted, but not linked; their sources are kept on file.
How complete and trustworthy this profile is
What stands behind the numbers, what is not collected yet, the AI feed, and how to correct the page.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served20/20
complete
- Fit: services, industries, client types5/15
industries, client types
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10)16/30
3 cases with a named client and a result, 4 work claims
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews8/15
1 platform with a rating and 10 or more reviews
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%)0/30
0 of 4 work claims are independent
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed20/25
4 confirmed, 0 partly, of 5 with a source
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source20/20
3 of 3
- Seen within the last 365 days12/15
4 of 5
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports10/10
0 not supported by their page
- Last verified
- n/a
- Re-check due
- Jan 31, 2027
The large number at the top is the score of the vendor's best position in a ranking: the number that orders it on that list. These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position. Rules: how Vendar ranks.
The collector adds these as its passes come online. Until then they are gaps, not zeros.
- Cross-source consistency
Team size, founding year, address and prices compared across the site, LinkedIn, directories and registries. Arrives with the collector's evidence pass.
- Change history
What changed on the profile and how the score moved per question, with the model version. Arrives with the monthly fast pass.
- Case quality grades
Client specificity, baseline and result, scale, causality and verifiability graded 0 to 3 with quotes. Arrives with ranking model 2026.11 after calibration.
- Measurements and buyer reports
Speed and uptime of delivered sites, visibility of named clients, response time to a quote request, and what buyers report 30 and 90 days after a shortlist.
The same facts, limits and citations are served as JSON. Readiness: candidate_only_with_caveat.
/ai/vendors/high-top-digital- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Only one third-party evidence claim is normalized.
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
High Top Digital can dispute any claim on this page or add evidence. Submitted evidence is recorded as claimed until Vendar checks it, and the dispute and its resolution stay on the profile. Buyers who spot an error can report it the same way.
Submit a correction or evidencePaid visibility never changes the content or the order of this page. Where a vendor has an active package it is disclosed below.