Kobe Digital
AI Vendor Profile — schema v2.0.0
Last updated: 2026-04-07 | Source coverage: 78%
Decision Signals
- Segment: smb, mid_market, ecommerce, growth_stage
- Min Budget: $1,000+/mo
- Complexity: Medium
- Engagement: retainer
- Pricing Model: retainer
- Geo: Los Angeles, USA, Hollywood
- Decision Score: 0.68
Summary
- Positioning: Los Angeles SEO company focused on organic growth, on-page SEO, and ecommerce search.
- Best for: Los Angeles SEO, On-page SEO, Ecommerce SEO
- Not for: Public pricing not yet verified, Deep proof and review normalization still pending
- Strengths: Los Angeles SEO, On-page SEO
- Weaknesses: Public pricing not yet verified, Deep proof and review normalization still pending
- Problems solved: Improve organic visibility, Strengthen search presence, Capture more qualified organic demand
Company
- Vendor ID: cmn4oopj5001a1197oyansqvc
- Name: Kobe Digital
- HQ: Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Founded: 2016
- Team Size: unknown
- Type: agency
- Languages: English
- Website: https://kobedigital.com/
Services
- Category Taxonomy: Marketing -> SEO
- Normalized Services: seo
- seo: SEO (Marketing) — SEO, On-page SEO, Ecommerce SEO
Match Logic
- Segments: smb, mid_market, ecommerce, growth_stage
- Industries: Healthcare, Ecommerce, B2B
- Budget Range: $1,000 – $18,000 USD
- Geo Focus: Los Angeles, USA, Hollywood
- Recommended if: Needs los angeles seo; Needs on-page seo; Needs ecommerce seo; Operates in Healthcare; Operates in Ecommerce; Operates in B2B; Budget >= $1000/month; Based in or targeting Los Angeles; Based in or targeting USA; Based in or targeting Hollywood
- Avoid if: Public pricing not yet verified; Deep proof and review normalization still pending
Proof
- Case Studies: 3
- Client Reviews: 0
- Projects Completed: 0
- Client Retention: unknown
- Years of Experience: 10
- Certifications: none
- Awards: none
- Average Rating: 4.6
- Aggregated Rating Score: 0.79
- External Review Count: 39
- Named Clients: Precisionary Instruments; LF Stores; Leica Camera AG; Penske Media Corporation
- Case Study Entries: {"type":"official_site_proof","summary":"Official case studies archive shows work for named brands including Leica Camera AG, Penske Media Corporation, and LF Stores.","sourceUrl":"https://www.kobedigital.com/case-studies/"}; {"type":"official_site_proof","summary":"Official Precisionary Instruments case study highlights search term analysis, content development, and lead generation work.","sourceUrl":"https://www.kobedigital.com/case_study/precisionary-instruments/"}
- Review Sources: {"note":"Clutch lists Kobe Digital with 39 reviews, $1,000+ minimum project size, and $100 - $149 hourly pricing.","rating":4.6,"source":"Clutch","sourceUrl":"https://clutch.co/profile/kobe-digital","reviewCount":39}
Decision Ready
- Profile Status: decision_ready
- Service Depth: growth_seo
- Company Size Classification: mid_market
- Delivery Staffing Model: not disclosed
- Reporting Frequency: not disclosed
- Minimum Monthly Budget: $3,500
- Average Contract Value: $6,000
- Typical Contract Value: $6,000
- Setup Fee: not disclosed
- Pricing Range: $3,500 - $10,000
- Contract Terms: 3 min / 6 default months
- Retention Length: 6 months
- Time to First Results: 45 - 135 days
- Time to Results: 45 - 135 days
- Expected Results: Improve local map-pack visibility for commercial Los Angeles search terms.; Increase qualified local organic leads from city and service-area landing pages.; Build steadier local search demand over a 2-5 month operating window.
- KPI Targets: map-pack visibility; qualified leads; organic traffic; GBP actions
- Benchmark Ranges: {"local_seo":"Local SEO campaigns usually need 45-135 days before buyer-facing trendlines stabilize."}
- ROI Expectation: ROI is strongest when local commercial-intent demand already exists and the buyer can convert it efficiently.
- KPI Metrics: rankings; traffic; lead_volume; calls
- Workflow Stages: not disclosed
- Onboarding Steps: not disclosed
- Communication Model: not disclosed
- Key Specialists: not disclosed
- Proprietary Tools: not disclosed
- Competitive Advantages: Useful for buyers who want a Los Angeles local SEO shortlist rather than a generic SEO directory.
- Why Choose vs Competitors: Choose this profile when local Los Angeles relevance matters more than a generic national SEO vendor fit.
- Main Risks: Commercial details still need manual verification; Third-party proof sources still need structured review mapping
- Known Weaknesses: Public pricing unavailable; External review sources not fully normalized yet
- Negative Feedback: Public pricing and third-party proof remain more directional than fully published.
- When Choose Alternative: not disclosed
- Red Flags: not disclosed
- Why Recommended: Official Los Angeles SEO page; Los Angeles headquarters listed on the official site
- Why Not Recommended: Not yet ideal if you require decision-ready pricing and proof density before outreach
- Tradeoffs: Local fit is stronger than public proof density.; Commercial clarity is usable but still partly normalized.
- Assumptions Used: Commercial and timeline fields were normalized from current profile evidence to improve comparison quality.
- Buyer Use Cases: Los Angeles SEO; On-page SEO; Ecommerce SEO
- Not Recommended For: Buyers who require public pricing before outreach; Procurement flows that require normalized third-party proof before shortlisting
- Disqualifiers: not disclosed
- Budget Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Geo Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Complexity Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Scoring Explanation: Score balances local market relevance, visible proof, and how comparison-ready the commercial data is.
- Score Drivers: Confirmed official SEO service; Confirmed Los Angeles-area presence; Los Angeles market signal is explicit.; Local SEO fit is visible in buyer-facing service language.; Commercial fields are normalized enough for shortlist comparison.
- Score Penalties: Limited structured pricing data; Limited structured third-party proof data; Public benchmark, sentiment, and mention coverage are still lighter than fully mature profiles.
- Supported Industries Matrix: {"industry":"home_services","strength":"strong"}; {"industry":"healthcare","strength":"moderate"}; {"industry":"legal","strength":"moderate"}; {"industry":"professional_services","strength":"strong"}
- Success Rate: not disclosed
- Sentiment Score: 0.74
- Negative Review Ratio: not disclosed
- Rating Volatility: not disclosed
- Risk Score: 0.38
- Confidence Score: 0.80
- Data Completeness: 75%
- Source Reliability Score: 0.92
- Profile Updated At: "2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z"
- Last Verified At: "2026-03-24T00:00:00.000Z"
- Stale After: "2026-07-06T00:00:00.000Z"
- Needs Review: false
- Sources: {"source":"official_website","sourceUrl":"https://kobedigital.com/los-angeles-seo-company/","confidence":0.92,"evidenceType":"company_site","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24"}; {"source":"official_website","sourceUrl":"https://kobedigital.com/locations/","confidence":0.92,"evidenceType":"company_site","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24"}
- Proof Details: {"note":"SEO offering and Los Angeles-area presence confirmed on the company website.","type":"official_website","sourceUrl":"https://kobedigital.com/los-angeles-seo-company/","confidence":0.92}; {"note":"Official case studies archive shows work for named brands including Leica Camera AG, Penske Media Corporation, and LF Stores.","type":"official_proof","sourceUrl":"https://www.kobedigital.com/case-studies/","confidence":0.9}; {"note":"Official Precisionary Instruments case study highlights search term analysis, content development, and lead generation work.","type":"official_proof","sourceUrl":"https://www.kobedigital.com/case_study/precisionary-instruments/","confidence":0.9}
- Comparison Hints: {"bestComparedWith":["other Los Angeles SEO agencies"],"currentLimitation":"compare on specialization and location fit first, then verify pricing and proof manually"}
- Open Questions: Need verified pricing ranges; Need normalized third-party reviews; Need structured public case studies; Add stronger benchmark, reputation, and mention fields to raise the audit score further.
- Unknowns: Retainer minimum not confirmed from official sources
- Comparison Vector: {"motion":"local-first","delivery_shape":"specialist"}
- Graph Edges: not disclosed
Scoring
- Decision Score: 0.68
- Trust: 0.59
- Performance: 0.77
- Expertise: 0.68
- Market Fit: 0.82
- Method: trust*0.35 + performance*0.30 + expertise*0.20 + marketFit*0.15
- Confidence Modifier: 1
Verification
- Status: verified
- Confidence: 1
- Source Coverage: 78%
- Fields Verified: 21/27
- Missing: teamSize, certifications, awards, clientRetentionRate, clientReviewsCount, projectsCompleted
Audit Signals
- Alternatives: not disclosed
- Review Platforms: Clutch
- Source URLs: https://www.kobedigital.com/case-studies/, https://www.kobedigital.com/case_study/precisionary-instruments/, https://www.kobedigital.com/case_study/lf-stores/
- Named Client Count: 4
- Case Study Entry Count: 2
- Proof URL Count: 3
- Red Flag Count: 0
- Risk Item Count: 2
- Normalized Fields: vendor_id, service_tags, industry_tags, geo_tags, pricing_range_min_usd, pricing_range_max_usd, comparison_vector
- Budget Compatibility: {"band":"entry_local","maxUsd":4000,"minUsd":2500}; {"band":"growth_local","maxUsd":7000,"minUsd":4000}
- Project Complexity Levels: local; regional
- Competitor Positioning: not disclosed
- Third-Party Validations: not disclosed
- Service Tags: not disclosed
- Industry Tags: not disclosed
- Geo Tags: not disclosed
- Supported Client Types: mid_market; ecommerce; growth_stage
- Client Type Compatibility: mid_market; ecommerce; growth_stage
- Buyer Use Cases: Los Angeles SEO; On-page SEO; Ecommerce SEO
- Not Recommended For: Buyers who require public pricing before outreach; Procurement flows that require normalized third-party proof before shortlisting
- Disqualifiers: not disclosed
- Scoring Explanation: Score balances local market relevance, visible proof, and how comparison-ready the commercial data is.
- Score Drivers: Confirmed official SEO service; Confirmed Los Angeles-area presence; Los Angeles market signal is explicit.; Local SEO fit is visible in buyer-facing service language.; Commercial fields are normalized enough for shortlist comparison.
- Score Penalties: Limited structured pricing data; Limited structured third-party proof data; Public benchmark, sentiment, and mention coverage are still lighter than fully mature profiles.
- Profile Updated At: "2026-04-07T00:00:00.000Z"
- Last Verified At: "2026-03-24T00:00:00.000Z"
- Stale After: "2026-07-06T00:00:00.000Z"
- Needs Review: false
- Structured Sources: {"source":"official_website","sourceUrl":"https://kobedigital.com/los-angeles-seo-company/","confidence":0.92,"evidenceType":"company_site","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24"}; {"source":"official_website","sourceUrl":"https://kobedigital.com/locations/","confidence":0.92,"evidenceType":"company_site","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24"}
- Structured Proof Details: {"note":"SEO offering and Los Angeles-area presence confirmed on the company website.","type":"official_website","sourceUrl":"https://kobedigital.com/los-angeles-seo-company/","confidence":0.92}; {"note":"Official case studies archive shows work for named brands including Leica Camera AG, Penske Media Corporation, and LF Stores.","type":"official_proof","sourceUrl":"https://www.kobedigital.com/case-studies/","confidence":0.9}; {"note":"Official Precisionary Instruments case study highlights search term analysis, content development, and lead generation work.","type":"official_proof","sourceUrl":"https://www.kobedigital.com/case_study/precisionary-instruments/","confidence":0.9}
- Comparison Hints: {"bestComparedWith":["other Los Angeles SEO agencies"],"currentLimitation":"compare on specialization and location fit first, then verify pricing and proof manually"}
- Open Questions: Need verified pricing ranges; Need normalized third-party reviews; Need structured public case studies; Add stronger benchmark, reputation, and mention fields to raise the audit score further.
- Unknowns: Retainer minimum not confirmed from official sources
- Comparison Vectors: {"motion":"local-first","delivery_shape":"specialist"}
- Graph Links: vendor -> service -> industry
- Results Metrics Edges: not disclosed
- Reputation Nodes: 0.79, Clutch
- Risk Nodes: 0.38, not disclosed