LinkGraph
VerifiedagencyNew York, NY, USA10-49New York, USA, Manhattan
New York SEO and link building agency with strong technical, content, and authority-growth coverage.
SEOLink BuildingGuest PostingNiche Edits
Best for
- Technical SEO
- Content-led
Commercial fit
Entry point
$5,000+/mo
SMB
Delivery confidence
Not disclosed
Retention signal missing
Watch-outs
- Less natural for ultra-small local-business retainers.
- May be heavier than necessary for buyers who only need simple local SEO execution.
Verdict: Strong in technical seo
Jump to decision summaryRecommended reading order
Read the verdict firstCheck shortlist reasons and watch-outsValidate pricing and proof before outreach
62/100
Audit-based ranking score
Developing
Use this as a shortlist candidate, not a final answer, until the missing proof and fit fields are tightened.
Mixed consistency
Human
51
23 missing
AI
73
11 missing
Gaps
24
main blockers
Why score is held back
Add benchmark ranges or benchmark comparison fields.
+2 more documented scoring gaps
Buyer-facing summary
Decision Summary
The fastest read on fit, risks, disqualifiers, and data quality before you invest time in full vendor review.
62/100Shortlist-ready
Fast verdict
Useful as an early shortlist candidate for this buyer context.
The strongest visible shortlist signals here are Official site positions LinkGraph around SEO and link building expertise, which maps well to technical and authority-led intents and Strong fit for SaaS, content-led, and in-house team scenarios where execution depth matters.
Use caution if your process depends on Very small local businesses needing only lightweight local SEO and Buyers whose main need is a low-touch local listings vendor.
Why Shortlist
- Official site positions LinkGraph around SEO and link building expertise, which maps well to technical and authority-led intents.
- Strong fit for SaaS, content-led, and in-house team scenarios where execution depth matters.
- Strong fit for authority-led link building with clearer SaaS and B2B alignment.
- Profile is commercially complete enough for New York shortlist use.
Not Recommended For
- Very small local businesses needing only lightweight local SEO.
- Buyers whose main need is a low-touch local listings vendor.
- Buyers who only need low-cost local citations or bare-minimum link volume.
Quality rail
Confidence
91%
Review status
Shortlist-ready
Completeness
90%
Reliability
95%
Last verified
April 17, 2026
Freshness
July 16, 2026
Best-fit layer
Buyer Use Cases
- Technical SEO and authority growth for SaaS and B2B teams
- Content-led SEO supported by link building and editorial systems
- Enterprise or scale-up search programs needing specialist SEO depth
- New York link building for SaaS and B2B brands that need stronger authority, digital PR, and scalable outreach.
- Editorial link acquisition where publisher quality matters more than bulk volume.
Caution layer
Main Risks
- Authority-building emphasis can make the commercial floor feel higher.
- Best fit leans toward growth-stage or more ambitious organic programs.
- Program fit should be validated if the buyer wants only lean local SEO support without broader authority work.
Reading guide
Start with shortlist reasons and risks first.
Use the quality rail to judge how trustworthy this profile feels.
If blockers remain, treat this as a candidate for deeper review, not a final choice.
Score blockers
Why this score is still being held back
The score is being suppressed mostly by missing or weakly documented decision fields, not by one fatal red flag.
Current state
62/100
6 active blockers still need cleanup.
1
Blocker 1
Add benchmark ranges or benchmark comparison fields.
2
Blocker 2
Add ROI expectation or payback logic.
3
Blocker 3
Add named clients where disclosure is allowed.
4
Blocker 4
Add third-party validations, awards, or certifications.
Disqualifiers
Hard disqualifiers are not documented yet.
Comparison Hints
- Weaker when. A different vertical, budget band, or delivery model is a better fit
- Stronger when. The buyer needs a New York-relevant SEO partner, The use case matches the vendor's specialty
- Best compared with. Mimvi SEO, Sure Oak, SEO Image
Fit Assessment
Explicit conditions for shortlisting or eliminating this vendor.
Shortlist this vendor if
- You need technical seo
- You need content-led
- You need b2b / saas
- You want to improved authority signals
- You want to better technical seo performance
- Your company is: Mid-Market Companies, b2b, saas, in_house_team
- Your budget is $5,000+/mo or above
- You operate in New York, USA, Manhattan
Skip this vendor if
- Less natural for ultra-small local-business retainers.
- May be heavier than necessary for buyers who only need simple local SEO execution.
- Your budget is below $5,000/month
- You require coverage outside of New York, USA, Manhattan
Pricing & Commercial Model
Read this section to understand entry point, commercial structure, and whether outreach will require manual pricing verification.
Commercial clarity
Entry point starts around $5,000+/mo.
Commercial model is retainer.
Hourly pricing is visible at $$100 - $149.
Minimum Budget
$5,000
per month
Typical Project
$12,000
total value
Hourly Rate
$$100 - $149
per hour
Pricing Model
Retainer
retainer, project
Budget Segment Fit
Startup
<$3K/mo
SMB
$3-10K/mo
Best fit
This vendor's visible pricing signals land most naturally in this budget range.
Mid-Market
$10-25K/mo
Enterprise
$25K+/mo
Company Snapshot
Background and operating context.
fact inferred unknown
Founded
Unknown
Team Size
10-49
Type
Agency
HQ
New York
Experience
Unknown
Retention
Unknown
Projects
Unknown
Reviews
Unknown
Geo Coverage
New YorkUSAManhattan
Ideal Client Profile
Supporting context on buyer types and problem space.
Client Types
Mid-Market Companies
b2b
saas
in_house_team
Industry Experience
B2BSaaSEcommerceTechnology
Problems They Solve
Improved authority signals
Better technical SEO performance
More scalable organic growth
Budget Requirement
Minimum engagement starts at $5,000+/mo — positioned for SMB buyers.
Services & Capabilities
Full service breadth and tools, beyond the primary decision layer.
Services & Capabilities
What this vendor delivers and how they deliver it.
Marketing
SEO
Link Building
Guest Posting
Niche Edits
Digital PR
Outreach
HARO
SaaS
Authority Links
High DR
Traffic-based
Skills
Digital PRAuthority LinksSEOTechnical SEOLink BuildingContent SEO
Decision-Ready Metadata
Structured support data used for moderation, buyer review, and AI extraction.
Pricing & Commercials
Minimum budget / entry point
$5,000 per month
Typical contract size
$12,000
Pricing range
$5,000 to $12,000
Setup fees
Setup fees not disclosed.
Contract length
4 month minimum term
Exit conditions
Not disclosed
Value & Outcome
Expected results
Improved authority signals; Better technical SEO performance; More scalable organic growth
Time to first results
45-120 days
KPI focus
Referring domains; Organic traffic; Non-brand rankings; Pipeline
Benchmarks / performance ranges
Not disclosed
ROI expectation / payback logic
Not disclosed
Proof, Trust & Reputation
Named clients
Not disclosed
Portfolio / links to work
https://www.linkgraph.com/
Third-party validation
Not disclosed
External reviews
Not disclosed
Average rating and review volume
Average rating and review volume not disclosed.
Mentions in media or communities
Not disclosed
Negative feedback summary
Not disclosed
Controversies / risks
Authority-building emphasis can make the commercial floor feel higher.; Best fit leans toward growth-stage or more ambitious organic programs.; Program fit should be validated if the buyer wants only lean local SEO support without broader authority work.
Process, Team & Differentiation
Workflow
Discovery and market audit; SEO roadmap and prioritization; Execution across technical, content, and local layers; Monthly reporting and iteration
Onboarding process
Business and market intake; Analytics and Search Console access; Audit and opportunity map; Launch of the first execution sprint
Communication model
Email; Monthly calls; Shared reporting
Reporting frequency
monthly
SLA / guarantees
Not disclosed
Key specialists
Not disclosed
Seniority level
Not disclosed
In-house vs outsourcing
In-house vs outsourcing not disclosed.
Unique selling proposition
New York SEO and link building agency with strong technical, content, and authority-growth coverage.
Proprietary tools
Not disclosed
Competitive advantages
Not disclosed
Why choose them vs competitors
Not disclosed
Fit, Risk & Alternatives
ICP / customer profile
Mid-Market Companies, b2b, saas, in_house_team
Industry strength
B2B; SaaS; Ecommerce; Technology
Use cases
Improved authority signals; Better technical SEO performance; More scalable organic growth
Buyer use cases
Technical SEO and authority growth for SaaS and B2B teams; Content-led SEO supported by link building and editorial systems; Enterprise or scale-up search programs needing specialist SEO depth; New York link building for SaaS and B2B brands that need stronger authority, digital PR, and scalable outreach.; Editorial link acquisition where publisher quality matters more than bulk volume.
Not recommended for
Very small local businesses needing only lightweight local SEO.; Buyers whose main need is a low-touch local listings vendor.; Buyers who only need low-cost local citations or bare-minimum link volume.
Disqualifiers
Not disclosed
Budget thresholds
Not disclosed
Complexity thresholds
Not disclosed
Budget mismatch rules
Not disclosed
Geo mismatch rules
Not disclosed
Complexity mismatch rules
Not disclosed
Main risks
Authority-building emphasis can make the commercial floor feel higher.; Best fit leans toward growth-stage or more ambitious organic programs.; Program fit should be validated if the buyer wants only lean local SEO support without broader authority work.
Known weaknesses
Less natural for ultra-small local-business retainers.; May be heavier than necessary for buyers who only need simple local SEO execution.
Dependency risks
Not disclosed
Overpromising signals
Not disclosed
Similar vendors
Not disclosed
When to choose an alternative
Not disclosed
Comparison hints
weakerWhen: A different vertical, budget band, or delivery model is a better fit; strongerWhen: The buyer needs a New York-relevant SEO partner; The use case matches the vendor's specialty; bestComparedWith: Mimvi SEO; Sure Oak; SEO Image
Positioning vs competitors
Not disclosed
Decision Metadata
Confidence score
0.91
Data completeness %
90%
Last updated timestamp
April 17, 2026
Profile updated at
April 17, 2026
Last verified at
April 17, 2026
Stale after
July 16, 2026
Needs review
No
Source reliability score
0.95
Scoring explanation
This profile is scored on visible New York market relevance, service fit, commercial clarity, and proof quality.
Score drivers
Confirmed SEO service positioning on the official site; New York market relevance is explicit in the profile; Buyer use cases are clear enough for intent-based routing
Score penalties
Commercial scope still benefits from direct verification; Proof depth still benefits from ongoing enrichment
Why recommended
Official site positions LinkGraph around SEO and link building expertise, which maps well to technical and authority-led intents.; Strong fit for SaaS, content-led, and in-house team scenarios where execution depth matters.; Strong fit for authority-led link building with clearer SaaS and B2B alignment.; Profile is commercially complete enough for New York shortlist use.
Why not recommended
Less natural for ultra-small local-business retainers.; May be heavier than necessary for buyers who only need simple local SEO execution.
Trade-offs
High specialisation — strong depth in core area, limited breadth across adjacent services.; No formal partner certifications on record — capability claims are not third-party validated.; Retainer-based model — favours ongoing relationships, less suited to one-off projects.
Assumptions used
Not disclosed
Sources
url: https://www.linkgraph.com/; label: official
Proof details
note: Official homepage positions LinkGraph around SEO and link building expertise, supporting technical and authority-growth use cases.; sourceUrl: https://www.linkgraph.com/
Open questions
Not disclosed
Unknowns
Not disclosed
Normalized fields across vendors
service tags: seo; seo; technical_seo; link_building; content_seo; industry tags: b2b; saas; ecommerce; technology; geo tags: new_york; usa; manhattan
Comparison vectors
Not disclosed
Graph compatibility
Not disclosed
Audit & Formula
Supporting audit detail behind the visible ranking score. Useful for moderation and deeper review, but not part of the first-screen decision layer.
Formula
(51 Human + 73 AI) / 2
Equal weight keeps ranking honest: the profile has to work for buyers and for machines.
How scoring worksChecklist audit
Human Audit
51/100
24 found, 23 missing
AI Audit
73/100
36 found, 11 missing
Main gaps behind this score
- Add benchmark ranges or benchmark comparison fields.
- Add ROI expectation or payback logic.
- Add named clients where disclosure is allowed.
- Add third-party validations, awards, or certifications.
Process & Delivery
Supporting delivery context for deeper review.
Engagement Models
Retainer
Project
Strengths, Weaknesses & Trade-offs
Supporting interpretation layer for deeper review.
Strengths
- Technical SEO
- Content-led
- B2B / SaaS
- Authority Links
- Agencies for SaaS
- New York link building
- SaaS link building
Weaknesses
- Less natural for ultra-small local-business retainers.
- May be heavier than necessary for buyers who only need simple local SEO execution.
Trade-offseditorial assessment
- High specialisation — strong depth in core area, limited breadth across adjacent services.
- No formal partner certifications on record — capability claims are not third-party validated.
- Retainer-based model — favours ongoing relationships, less suited to one-off projects.
How to read this evidence
Visible proof is still thin, so this section should be treated cautiously.
Open case study links to validate whether outcomes are specific enough for your use case.
1
Case Studies
Limited
None
Client Reviews
Limited
Unknown
Projects Completed
Early stage
Unknown
Client Retention
Unknown
Case Studies
Industries Served
B2BSaaSEcommerceTechnology
Comparison Paths
Alternatives to Consider
Nearby options worth opening if this vendor feels close but not quite right on budget, positioning, or fit.
Shared service fit
Matches on SEO and Link Building.
P
Page One Power
Manual outreach and editorial link building partner known for custom prospecting, link placements, and sustained authority growth.
67/100
Better if you need
- Outreach
- Guest posting
Overlap signals
SEOLink BuildingB2BSaaSEcommerce
From $4,000/mo
Open profile
Shared service fit
Matches on SEO and Link Building.
S
Siege Media
Content and digital PR-led link building partner known for editorial assets, authority growth, and scalable organic amplification.
67/100
Better if you need
- Digital PR
- Authority links
Overlap signals
SEOLink BuildingSaaSB2BEcommerce
From $8,000/mo
Open profile
Shared service fit
Matches on SEO and Link Building.
iPullRank
New York SEO agency built for enterprise, technical, and content-led organic growth programs.
65/100
Better if you need
- Technical SEO
- Content-led
Overlap signals
SEOLink BuildingB2BSaaSTechnology
From $7,000/mo
Open profile
Shortlist Decision
Final Verdict
Decision score
62/100
Budget floor
$5,000+/mo
62/100
AverageDecision path
Use this block to make the final call: shortlist, skip, or compare against nearby alternatives.
LinkGraph is a agency focused on technical seo and content-led.
Key trade-off: High specialisation — strong depth in core area, limited breadth across adjacent services.
Do not shortlist if less natural for ultra-small local-business retainers., or if may be heavier than necessary for buyers who only need simple local seo execution.. The $5,000+/mo minimum engagement rules out smaller or exploratory budgets.
Shortlist if
- Technical SEO
- Content-led
- B2B / SaaS
Skip if
- Less natural for ultra-small local-business retainers.
- May be heavier than necessary for buyers who only need simple local SEO execution.
Main trade-off
- High specialisation — strong depth in core area, limited breadth across adjacent services.
- No formal partner certifications on record — capability claims are not third-party validated.
- Retainer-based model — favours ongoing relationships, less suited to one-off projects.