Marketing Eye Atlanta: all proof and data on file
Every case, review and source Vendar holds, grouped by need. Filter by need, by work done, or by items checked against their source.
Every proof item on file for Marketing Eye Atlanta: who said it, where and when.
No proof matches a published need yet.
- marketingeyeatlanta.com4
Nothing matches these filters.
Other work done
4Cases and reviews outside the needs Vendar ranks
Marketing Eye designed and deployed email campaigns for Angus Australia, with open rates peaking at 71%.
agency's own wordsmarketingeyeatlanta.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026result 2025open sourceshow the quote
Designed and deployed email campaigns with open rates peaking at 71%
Marketing Eye conducted PR and advertising efforts for Angus Australia that resulted in 50+ media placements.
agency's own wordsmarketingeyeatlanta.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026show the quote
Launched PR and advertising efforts that resulted in 50+ media placements
Marketing Eye's campaign for Angus Australia's event was associated with attendance of over 4,000+ across the Zoetis AngusEXPO, gala dinner, and tours.
agency's own wordsmarketingeyeatlanta.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026show the quote
Attendance skyrocketed to over 4,000+ across the Zoetis AngusEXPO, gala dinner, and tours
Marketing Eye partnered with The Athlete’s Foot on SEO optimization, website improvements and Google Ads campaigns that achieved up to 11x ROAS.
agency's own wordsmarketingeyeatlanta.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026year of result not statedopen sourceshow the quote
Marketing Eye partnered with The Athlete’s Foot to strengthen its digital presence and accelerate e-commerce growth. Our work included SEO optimization, strategic website improvements and high-performing Google Ads campaigns that achieved up to 11x ROAS .
Reviews from platforms that compete with Vendar are counted, but not linked; their sources are kept on file.
How complete and trustworthy this profile is
What stands behind the numbers, what is not collected yet, the AI feed, and how to correct the page.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served10/20
founding year, team size, logo
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
complete
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee10/20
hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10)16/30
3 cases with a named client and a result, 4 work claims
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews0/15
0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%)0/30
0 of 4 work claims are independent
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed25/25
4 confirmed, 0 partly, of 4 with a source
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source20/20
2 of 2
- Seen within the last 365 days15/15
4 of 4
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports10/10
0 not supported by their page
- Last verified
- n/a
- Re-check due
- Feb 1, 2027
The large number at the top is the score of the vendor's best position in a ranking: the number that orders it on that list. These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position. Rules: how Vendar ranks.
The collector adds these as its passes come online. Until then they are gaps, not zeros.
- Cross-source consistency
Team size, founding year, address and prices compared across the site, LinkedIn, directories and registries. Arrives with the collector's evidence pass.
- Change history
What changed on the profile and how the score moved per question, with the model version. Arrives with the monthly fast pass.
- Case quality grades
Client specificity, baseline and result, scale, causality and verifiability graded 0 to 3 with quotes. Arrives with ranking model 2026.11 after calibration.
- Measurements and buyer reports
Speed and uptime of delivered sites, visibility of named clients, response time to a quote request, and what buyers report 30 and 90 days after a shortlist.
The same facts, limits and citations are served as JSON. Readiness: candidate_only_with_caveat.
/ai/vendors/marketing-eye-atlanta- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Marketing Eye Atlanta can dispute any claim on this page or add evidence. Submitted evidence is recorded as claimed until Vendar checks it, and the dispute and its resolution stay on the profile. Buyers who spot an error can report it the same way.
Submit a correction or evidencePaid visibility never changes the content or the order of this page. Where a vendor has an active package it is disclosed below.