Meta Mind Developers: all proof and data on file
Every case, review and source Vendar holds, grouped by need. Filter by need, by work done, or by items checked against their source.
Every proof item on file for Meta Mind Developers: who said it, where and when.
No proof matches a published need yet.
- metaminddevs.com2
- google.com1
Nothing matches these filters.
Other work done
2Cases and reviews outside the needs Vendar ranks
Meta Mind Developers worked with Daniela Picado to create a website. She describes the team as responsible, professional, and responsive.
agency's own wordsmetaminddevs.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026show the quote
I collaborated with Meta Mind Developers to create a website. They are a pleasure to work with: responsible, professional, and responsive.
Meta Mind Developer LLC built a custom website for George Herrera. He says he is happy with the results.
agency's own wordsmetaminddevs.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026show the quote
I want to thank Shail at Meta Mind Developer LLC for building me the most amazing custom website. It was such a pleasure building this together every step of the way with my ideas and their technical know how. They were always fast to respond to my every message. I would most definitely recommend Meta Mind Developer LLC to ANYONE who wants an amazing website done with a talented and committed team. I am so thankful to them for their amazing customer service and technical knowledge. Am so happy with their results!
Services offered
1Service pages and pricing: what the agency sells, not what it has done
Source reference: google.com
outside sourcecheckedGoogle
Reviews from platforms that compete with Vendar are counted, but not linked; their sources are kept on file.
How complete and trustworthy this profile is
What stands behind the numbers, what is not collected yet, the AI feed, and how to correct the page.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served10/20
founding year, team size, logo
- Fit: services, industries, client types5/15
industries, client types
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10)2/30
0 cases with a named client and a result, 2 work claims
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews0/15
0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews; Google: too few reviews to count
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%)0/30
0 of 2 work claims are independent
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed17/25
2 confirmed, 0 partly, of 3 with a source
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source20/20
0 of 0
- Seen within the last 365 days10/15
2 of 3
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports10/10
0 not supported by their page
- Last verified
- n/a
- Re-check due
- Feb 1, 2027
The large number at the top is the score of the vendor's best position in a ranking: the number that orders it on that list. These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position. Rules: how Vendar ranks.
The collector adds these as its passes come online. Until then they are gaps, not zeros.
- Cross-source consistency
Team size, founding year, address and prices compared across the site, LinkedIn, directories and registries. Arrives with the collector's evidence pass.
- Change history
What changed on the profile and how the score moved per question, with the model version. Arrives with the monthly fast pass.
- Case quality grades
Client specificity, baseline and result, scale, causality and verifiability graded 0 to 3 with quotes. Arrives with ranking model 2026.11 after calibration.
- Measurements and buyer reports
Speed and uptime of delivered sites, visibility of named clients, response time to a quote request, and what buyers report 30 and 90 days after a shortlist.
The same facts, limits and citations are served as JSON. Readiness: candidate_only_with_caveat.
/ai/vendors/meta-mind-developers- None of the 2 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Only one third-party evidence claim is normalized.
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Meta Mind Developers can dispute any claim on this page or add evidence. Submitted evidence is recorded as claimed until Vendar checks it, and the dispute and its resolution stay on the profile. Buyers who spot an error can report it the same way.
Submit a correction or evidencePaid visibility never changes the content or the order of this page. Where a vendor has an active package it is disclosed below.