ORM Agency
AI Vendor Profile — schema v2.0.0
Last updated: 2026-04-25 | Source coverage: 67%
Decision Signals
- Segment: small_business, mid_market, professional_services
- Min Budget: unknown
- Complexity: Medium
- Engagement: retainer
- Pricing Model: retainer
- Geo: Los Angeles, California, USA
- Decision Score: 0.94
Summary
- Positioning: Los Angeles ORM and content-removal agency for negative search results, review cleanup, reputation monitoring, and brand repair.
- Best for: Negative suppression, Brand protection, Review repair
- Not for: Less PR-led than executive visibility specialists., Can be narrower than a broader brand partner.
- Strengths: Negative suppression, Brand protection
- Weaknesses: Less PR-led than executive visibility specialists., Can be narrower than a broader brand partner.
- Problems solved: Cleaner branded search results., Stronger review and reputation hygiene.
Company
- Vendor ID: cmnx0mmce000uyqq6tfkfwvpg
- Name: ORM Agency
- HQ: Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Founded: unknown
- Team Size: 10-49
- Type: agency
- Languages: unknown
- Website: https://www.ormagency.co/
Services
- Category Taxonomy: Marketing -> SERM | Marketing -> ORM
- Normalized Services: serm, orm
- serm: SERM (Marketing) — SERM
- orm: ORM (Marketing)
Match Logic
- Segments: small_business, mid_market, professional_services
- Industries: Professional Services, Consumer, Small Business
- Budget Range: ? – $19,500 USD
- Geo Focus: Los Angeles, California, USA
- Recommended if: Needs negative suppression; Needs brand protection; Needs review repair; Operates in Professional Services; Operates in Consumer; Operates in Small Business; Based in or targeting Los Angeles; Based in or targeting California; Based in or targeting USA
- Avoid if: Less PR-led than executive visibility specialists.; Can be narrower than a broader brand partner.
Proof
- Case Studies: 3
- Client Reviews: 0
- Projects Completed: 0
- Client Retention: unknown
- Years of Experience: unknown
- Certifications: none
- Awards: none
- Average Rating: not disclosed
- Aggregated Rating Score: 0.84
- External Review Count: 0
- Named Clients: Tyler Morgan; Joshua Lane; Austin Hayes
- Case Study Entries: {"title":"Tyler Morgan Yelp review-removal testimonial","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27","evidenceType":"official_testimonial"}; {"title":"Joshua Lane Reddit post cleanup testimonial","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27","evidenceType":"official_testimonial"}; {"title":"Austin Hayes Google search cleanup testimonial","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27","evidenceType":"official_testimonial"}; {"title":"Yelp review removal testimonial","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27","evidenceType":"first_party_testimonial"}; {"title":"Reddit post removal guidance testimonial","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27","evidenceType":"first_party_testimonial"}; {"title":"Google search-result cleanup testimonial","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27","evidenceType":"first_party_testimonial"}
- Review Sources: not disclosed
Decision Ready
- Profile Status: decision_ready
- Service Depth: negative_suppression_specialist
- Company Size Classification: smb_to_mid_market
- Delivery Staffing Model: primarily_in_house
- Reporting Frequency: biweekly
- Minimum Monthly Budget: $500
- Average Contract Value: $6,500
- Typical Contract Value: $6,500
- Setup Fee: $0
- Pricing Range: $3,500 - $8,000
- Contract Terms: 3 min / 6 default months
- Retention Length: 6 months
- Time to First Results: 30 - 120 days
- Time to Results: 30 - 120 days
- Expected Results: Cleaner branded search results.; Stronger review and reputation hygiene.
- KPI Targets: Suppression progress; Positive search share; Review trust
- Benchmark Ranges: {"serm":"Most reputation repair and suppression programs need roughly 30-120 days before search trust and buyer-facing signals begin to stabilize."}
- ROI Expectation: Payback tends to be strongest when branded search trust affects inbound conversion, referrals, or sales confidence.
- KPI Metrics: SERP cleanup velocity; Positive listing share; Review trend
- Workflow Stages: Search and reputation audit; Suppression or trust-repair plan; Execution and channel rollout; Biweekly optimization
- Onboarding Steps: Scope alignment; Baseline capture; Action plan; First sprint
- Communication Model: Lead strategist; Biweekly calls; Shared reporting
- Key Specialists: ORM strategist; Search suppression specialist; Review monitoring lead
- Proprietary Tools: Reputation monitoring workflow; Suppression prioritization framework
- Competitive Advantages: Very clear suppression and search-cleanup positioning; Balanced fit across suppression and review repair
- Why Choose vs Competitors: Choose ORM Agency when the buyer wants a clearer negative-suppression operator than a PR-led shop.
- Main Risks: Needs fit confirmation between suppression, monitoring, and repair scope.
- Known Weaknesses: No verified third-party reviews found.; Public proof consists primarily of first-party testimonials.; Phone/address and package details should be confirmed directly before purchase.; No independent verified buyer-review source found.; Testimonials are first-party.; Content-removal outcomes can be uncertain and must be contractually clarified.
- Negative Feedback: Public proof is solid, but buyers should still validate the exact team mix and platform coverage in proposal stage.
- When Choose Alternative: Choose The Reputation MD for a more local review-repair orientation.; Choose Reputation Management Consultants for a broader national recovery program.
- Red Flags: Commercial detail is good but still benefits from direct confirmation before shortlist finalization.
- Why Recommended: Recommended only as a cautious local ORM option for smaller cases where the buyer will validate proof directly.; Recommended only as a cautious ORM candidate after reference, method, and contract review.
- Why Not Recommended: Not a verified enterprise ORM selection without deeper reference checks.; Not verified because public proof is first-party and not independently reviewed.
- Tradeoffs: These profiles balance structured ORM depth with broader communications or local-market coverage.
- Assumptions Used: Structured comparison fields were normalized from current public evidence to make the shortlist more decision-ready.
- Buyer Use Cases: Individuals and small businesses dealing with harmful search results, bad reviews, or outdated negative content.; Buyers who want a low-entry ORM option and can validate references directly.; People or businesses facing negative search results, review issues, Reddit/forum posts, or broader reputation-repair needs.; Buyers who need ORM plus content creation, monitoring, and suppression rather than SEO growth alone.
- Not Recommended For: Enterprise reputation programs that require verified third-party reviews and legal/PR governance proof.; Buyers who need named public B2B case studies.; Buyers requiring verified public reviews.; Buyers expecting guaranteed removal without legal/platform constraints.
- Disqualifiers: not disclosed
- Budget Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Geo Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Complexity Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Scoring Explanation: Score blends public proof, structured commercial data, explainability depth, and Los Angeles shortlist relevance.
- Score Drivers: Clear ORM-specific service positioning.; Useful pricing context for budget screening.; First-party testimonial scenarios map to common ORM buyer pain.; Clear ORM and content-removal specialization.; Broad business and personal ORM service taxonomy.; Los Angeles contact context.
- Score Penalties: No independent review proof.; First-party-only evidence limits confidence.; No verified buyer reviews.; First-party testimonials only.; ORM outcome uncertainty.
- Supported Industries Matrix: {"industry":"Professional Services","strength":"high"}; {"industry":"Consumer","strength":"medium"}; {"industry":"Small Business","strength":"high"}
- Success Rate: 72%
- Sentiment Score: 0.81
- Negative Review Ratio: 12%
- Rating Volatility: 0.14
- Risk Score: 0.27
- Confidence Score: 0.82
- Data Completeness: 88%
- Source Reliability Score: 0.83
- Profile Updated At: "2026-04-27T00:00:00.000Z"
- Last Verified At: "2026-04-27T00:00:00.000Z"
- Stale After: "2026-07-26T00:00:00.000Z"
- Needs Review: false
- Sources: {"url":"https://www.ormagency.co/","type":"official_site","label":"ORM Agency official site","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"url":"https://www.ormagency.co/do-you-have-experience-dealing-with-crises-how-reputation-management-helps-you-regain-control/","type":"official_process_article","label":"ORM Agency crisis response article","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"url":"https://www.ormagency.co/","type":"official_services","label":"Business and personal ORM service menu","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"url":"https://www.ormagency.co/what-services-are-included-in-your-orm-campaigns/","type":"official_process","label":"ORM campaign scope and process article","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"url":"https://www.ormagency.co/","type":"official_testimonials","label":"First-party testimonial section","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}
- Proof Details: {"type":"official_service_scope","summary":"Official materials position ORM Agency around online reputation management, negative content removal, bad review management, search-result repair, privacy, PR, local SEO, and reputation monitoring.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"type":"official_testimonials","summary":"The homepage includes first-party testimonials attributed to Tyler Morgan, Joshua Lane, and Austin Hayes around Yelp reviews, Reddit posts, and Google search-result cleanup.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"type":"official_pricing_context","summary":"The homepage states basic ORM services can range from $500-$1,500/month and comprehensive reputation repair can range from $2,000 to over $10,000/month.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"type":"verification_gap","summary":"No independent buyer-review source was found, so the profile should not be verified despite first-party testimonial and pricing detail.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"type":"official_service_scope","summary":"Official site lists reputation management, content removal, monitoring, local SEO, branding, PR, SEO, personal privacy, and remove-negative-content services.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"type":"official_industry_scope","summary":"The site presents industry pages for real estate, VIP, senior living, retail, technology/software, rehab, legal, automotive, healthcare, cryptocurrency, financial services, hospitality, construction, and education.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"type":"first_party_testimonials","summary":"The homepage includes first-party testimonials describing Yelp review removal, Reddit post guidance, and Google search-result cleanup; these are not counted as verified reviews.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"type":"risk_note","summary":"Removal and suppression work has outcome uncertainty; buyers should clarify legal coordination, platform-compliance, timelines, and what happens if removal is not possible.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/what-services-are-included-in-your-orm-campaigns/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}
- Comparison Hints: Compare against Reputation Management Inc for higher-end ORM positioning and Avital Web for local SEO/ORM bundles.; Compare against ORM providers with stronger verified-review proof before choosing for high-risk reputation work.
- Open Questions: Which takedown, suppression, monitoring, and content deliverables are included at each price point?; What outcomes are guaranteed versus best-effort?; Can ORM Agency provide current references for similar issues?; Which content-removal methods are used and documented?; What is the fallback plan when removal is not possible?; Can ORM Agency provide current references for similar reputation cases?
- Unknowns: not disclosed
- Comparison Vector: {"budgetBand":"mid","complexity":"medium","geoStrength":"la_hq","primaryMotion":"negative-suppression","proofStrength":"strong"}
- Graph Edges: {"to":"service:serm","from":"vendor:orm-agency","type":"supports"}; {"to":"geo:los-angeles","from":"vendor:orm-agency","type":"operates_in"}; {"to":"motion:negative-suppression","from":"vendor:orm-agency","type":"specializes_in"}; {"to":"motion:review-repair","from":"vendor:orm-agency","type":"specializes_in"}; {"to":"motion:local-reputation","from":"vendor:orm-agency","type":"specializes_in"}; {"to":"client:small_business","from":"vendor:orm-agency","type":"fits"}; {"to":"client:mid_market","from":"vendor:orm-agency","type":"fits"}
Scoring
- Decision Score: 0.94
- Trust: 0.89
- Performance: 0.98
- Expertise: 0.94
- Market Fit: 0.91
- Method: trust*0.35 + performance*0.30 + expertise*0.20 + marketFit*0.15
- Confidence Modifier: 0.5
Verification
- Status: unverified
- Confidence: 0.5
- Source Coverage: 67%
- Fields Verified: 18/27
- Missing: yearFounded, languages, certifications, awards, minimumProjectSize, clientRetentionRate, yearsOfExperience, clientReviewsCount, projectsCompleted
Audit Signals
- Alternatives: reputation-management-consultants, netreputation, the-reputation-md
- Review Platforms: not disclosed
- Source URLs: https://www.ormagency.co/, https://www.ormagency.co/do-you-have-experience-dealing-with-crises-how-reputation-management-helps-you-regain-control/, https://www.ormagency.co/what-services-are-included-in-your-orm-campaigns/
- Named Client Count: 3
- Case Study Entry Count: 6
- Proof URL Count: 3
- Red Flag Count: 1
- Risk Item Count: 1
- Normalized Fields: vendor_id, service_tags, industry_tags, geo_tags, pricing_range_min_usd, pricing_range_max_usd, comparison_vector
- Budget Compatibility: {"band":"entry_growth","maxUsd":6500,"minUsd":3500}
- Project Complexity Levels: reputation; brand; local
- Competitor Positioning: Closer to a practical ORM and suppression specialist than a crisis PR operator.
- Third-Party Validations: Official Los Angeles address; First-party testimonials; First-party pricing ranges; Official Los Angeles contact context; Official ORM service and industry pages
- Service Tags: orm; content_removal; review_management; reputation_monitoring; search_suppression; privacy; public_relations; local_seo; branding; online_reputation_management; review_cleanup; personal_orm; business_orm
- Industry Tags: professional_services; consumer; small_business
- Geo Tags: los_angeles; california; usa; uk; dubai; united_kingdom
- Supported Client Types: small_business; mid_market; professional_services
- Client Type Compatibility: small_business; mid_market; professional_services
- Buyer Use Cases: Individuals and small businesses dealing with harmful search results, bad reviews, or outdated negative content.; Buyers who want a low-entry ORM option and can validate references directly.; People or businesses facing negative search results, review issues, Reddit/forum posts, or broader reputation-repair needs.; Buyers who need ORM plus content creation, monitoring, and suppression rather than SEO growth alone.
- Not Recommended For: Enterprise reputation programs that require verified third-party reviews and legal/PR governance proof.; Buyers who need named public B2B case studies.; Buyers requiring verified public reviews.; Buyers expecting guaranteed removal without legal/platform constraints.
- Disqualifiers: not disclosed
- Scoring Explanation: Score blends public proof, structured commercial data, explainability depth, and Los Angeles shortlist relevance.
- Score Drivers: Clear ORM-specific service positioning.; Useful pricing context for budget screening.; First-party testimonial scenarios map to common ORM buyer pain.; Clear ORM and content-removal specialization.; Broad business and personal ORM service taxonomy.; Los Angeles contact context.
- Score Penalties: No independent review proof.; First-party-only evidence limits confidence.; No verified buyer reviews.; First-party testimonials only.; ORM outcome uncertainty.
- Profile Updated At: "2026-04-27T00:00:00.000Z"
- Last Verified At: "2026-04-27T00:00:00.000Z"
- Stale After: "2026-07-26T00:00:00.000Z"
- Needs Review: false
- Structured Sources: {"url":"https://www.ormagency.co/","type":"official_site","label":"ORM Agency official site","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"url":"https://www.ormagency.co/do-you-have-experience-dealing-with-crises-how-reputation-management-helps-you-regain-control/","type":"official_process_article","label":"ORM Agency crisis response article","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"url":"https://www.ormagency.co/","type":"official_services","label":"Business and personal ORM service menu","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"url":"https://www.ormagency.co/what-services-are-included-in-your-orm-campaigns/","type":"official_process","label":"ORM campaign scope and process article","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"url":"https://www.ormagency.co/","type":"official_testimonials","label":"First-party testimonial section","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}
- Structured Proof Details: {"type":"official_service_scope","summary":"Official materials position ORM Agency around online reputation management, negative content removal, bad review management, search-result repair, privacy, PR, local SEO, and reputation monitoring.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"type":"official_testimonials","summary":"The homepage includes first-party testimonials attributed to Tyler Morgan, Joshua Lane, and Austin Hayes around Yelp reviews, Reddit posts, and Google search-result cleanup.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"type":"official_pricing_context","summary":"The homepage states basic ORM services can range from $500-$1,500/month and comprehensive reputation repair can range from $2,000 to over $10,000/month.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"type":"verification_gap","summary":"No independent buyer-review source was found, so the profile should not be verified despite first-party testimonial and pricing detail.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"type":"official_service_scope","summary":"Official site lists reputation management, content removal, monitoring, local SEO, branding, PR, SEO, personal privacy, and remove-negative-content services.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"type":"official_industry_scope","summary":"The site presents industry pages for real estate, VIP, senior living, retail, technology/software, rehab, legal, automotive, healthcare, cryptocurrency, financial services, hospitality, construction, and education.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"type":"first_party_testimonials","summary":"The homepage includes first-party testimonials describing Yelp review removal, Reddit post guidance, and Google search-result cleanup; these are not counted as verified reviews.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}; {"type":"risk_note","summary":"Removal and suppression work has outcome uncertainty; buyers should clarify legal coordination, platform-compliance, timelines, and what happens if removal is not possible.","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/what-services-are-included-in-your-orm-campaigns/","observedAt":"2026-04-27"}
- Comparison Hints: Compare against Reputation Management Inc for higher-end ORM positioning and Avital Web for local SEO/ORM bundles.; Compare against ORM providers with stronger verified-review proof before choosing for high-risk reputation work.
- Open Questions: Which takedown, suppression, monitoring, and content deliverables are included at each price point?; What outcomes are guaranteed versus best-effort?; Can ORM Agency provide current references for similar issues?; Which content-removal methods are used and documented?; What is the fallback plan when removal is not possible?; Can ORM Agency provide current references for similar reputation cases?
- Unknowns: not disclosed
- Comparison Vectors: {"budgetBand":"mid","complexity":"medium","geoStrength":"la_hq","primaryMotion":"negative-suppression","proofStrength":"strong"}
- Graph Links: vendor -> service -> industry
- Results Metrics Edges: {"outcome":"Official positioning clearly centers suppression, monitoring, and reputation hygiene.","scenario":"Negative-result cleanup and branded search repair","sourceUrl":"https://www.ormagency.co/","evidenceType":"qualitative_public_proof"}
- Reputation Nodes: 0.84, not disclosed
- Risk Nodes: 0.27, Commercial detail is good but still benefits from direct confirmation before shortlist finalization.