Page One Power
AI Vendor Profile — schema v2.0.0
Last updated: 2026-03-16 | Source coverage: 96%
Decision Signals
- Segment: smb, mid_market, enterprise
- Min Budget: $4,000+/mo
- Complexity: High
- Engagement: retainer
- Pricing Model: retainer
- Geo: USA, Canada
- Decision Score: 0.36
Summary
- Positioning: Link building specialists focused on sustainable, white-hat strategies
- Best for: White-hat link building, Sustainable link acquisition, Content-backed outreach
- Not for: Link building only — no full SEO service, No PPC, No technical SEO implementation
- Strengths: White-hat link building, Sustainable link acquisition, 14 years experience
- Weaknesses: Link building only — no full SEO service, No PPC, No technical SEO implementation
- Problems solved: Build high-quality backlink profiles, Earn editorial links through outreach, Recover from bad link history
Company
- Vendor ID: cmmtswbat0058hqk2ubt1mds7
- Name: Page One Power
- HQ: Boise, USA
- Founded: 2010
- Team Size: 20-50
- Type: agency
- Languages: English
- Website: https://pageonepower.com
Services
- Category Taxonomy: Marketing -> SEO | Marketing -> Content Marketing
- Normalized Services: seo, content_marketing
- seo: SEO (Marketing)
- content_marketing: Content Marketing (Marketing) — Content Creation
Match Logic
- Segments: smb, mid_market, enterprise
- Industries: SaaS, Ecommerce, Healthcare, Education
- Budget Range: $4,000 – $36,000 USD
- Geo Focus: USA, Canada
- Recommended if: Needs white-hat link building; Needs sustainable link acquisition; Needs content-backed outreach; Operates in SaaS; Operates in Ecommerce; Operates in Healthcare; Budget >= $4000/month; Based in or targeting USA; Based in or targeting Canada
- Avoid if: Link building only — no full SEO service; No PPC; No technical SEO implementation
Proof
- Case Studies: 18
- Client Reviews: 55
- Projects Completed: 300
- Client Retention: 79%
- Years of Experience: 14
- Certifications: none
- Awards: SEJ Best Link Building Company
- Average Rating: not disclosed
- Aggregated Rating Score: not disclosed
- External Review Count: not disclosed
- Named Clients: not disclosed
- Case Study Entries: {"note":"Structured from imported aggregate case-study counts; source-by-source normalization still needed.","type":"case_study_aggregate","count":18,"source":"scraper","normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z","serviceScope":["SEO","Content Marketing"]}
- Review Sources: {"note":"Structured from imported review totals; original public review platforms still need normalization.","type":"aggregate_review_count","source":"scraper","reviewCount":55,"normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}
Decision Ready
- Profile Status: draft
- Service Depth: not disclosed
- Company Size Classification: not disclosed
- Delivery Staffing Model: not disclosed
- Reporting Frequency: not disclosed
- Minimum Monthly Budget: $4,000
- Average Contract Value: $12,000
- Typical Contract Value: $12,000
- Setup Fee: not disclosed
- Pricing Range: $4,000 - $12,000
- Contract Terms: 3 min / 6 default months
- Retention Length: not disclosed months
- Time to First Results: not disclosed - not disclosed days
- Time to Results: not disclosed - not disclosed days
- Expected Results: not disclosed
- KPI Targets: not disclosed
- Benchmark Ranges: not disclosed
- ROI Expectation: not disclosed
- KPI Metrics: not disclosed
- Workflow Stages: not disclosed
- Onboarding Steps: not disclosed
- Communication Model: not disclosed
- Key Specialists: not disclosed
- Proprietary Tools: not disclosed
- Competitive Advantages: not disclosed
- Why Choose vs Competitors: not disclosed
- Main Risks: not disclosed
- Known Weaknesses: not disclosed
- Negative Feedback: not disclosed
- When Choose Alternative: not disclosed
- Red Flags: not disclosed
- Why Recommended: not disclosed
- Why Not Recommended: not disclosed
- Tradeoffs: not disclosed
- Assumptions Used: minimumMonthlyBudgetUsd inferred from minimumProjectSize for retainer pricing until a monthly floor is explicitly verified.; typicalContractValueUsd inferred from averageProjectSize until contract value is directly verified.; pricingRangeMinUsd inferred from minimumProjectSize until a fuller range is verified.; pricingRangeMaxUsd inferred from averageProjectSize until a fuller range is verified.; contractMinMonths inferred from pricing model and engagement structure until an explicit contract term is verified.
- Buyer Use Cases: not disclosed
- Not Recommended For: not disclosed
- Disqualifiers: not disclosed
- Budget Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Geo Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Complexity Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Scoring Explanation: not disclosed
- Score Drivers: not disclosed
- Score Penalties: not disclosed
- Supported Industries Matrix: not disclosed
- Success Rate: not disclosed
- Sentiment Score: not disclosed
- Negative Review Ratio: not disclosed
- Rating Volatility: not disclosed
- Risk Score: not disclosed
- Confidence Score: 0.51
- Data Completeness: 62%
- Source Reliability Score: 0.61
- Profile Updated At: "2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"
- Last Verified At: "2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"
- Stale After: "2026-05-23T10:14:34.305Z"
- Needs Review: false
- Sources: {"note":"Derived from existing imported vendor record.","field":"caseStudyEntries","source":"scraper","confidence":0.51,"evidenceType":"dataset_aggregate","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}; {"note":"Review totals exist on the vendor record; platform-level attribution pending.","field":"externalReviewSources","source":"scraper","confidence":0.51,"evidenceType":"dataset_aggregate","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}
- Proof Details: {"type":"case_study_aggregate","count":18,"source":"scraper","normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}; {"type":"review_aggregate","count":55,"source":"scraper","normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}
- Comparison Hints: not disclosed
- Open Questions: Normalize named clients from public case studies if available.; Replace aggregate review source with named review platforms during editorial verification.
- Unknowns: not disclosed
- Comparison Vector: not disclosed
- Graph Edges: not disclosed
Scoring
- Decision Score: 0.36
- Trust: 0.35
- Performance: 0.37
- Expertise: 0.36
- Market Fit: 0.98
- Method: trust*0.35 + performance*0.30 + expertise*0.20 + marketFit*0.15
- Confidence Modifier: 0.7
Verification
- Status: unverified
- Confidence: 0.7
- Source Coverage: 96%
- Fields Verified: 26/27
- Missing: certifications
Audit Signals
- Alternatives: not disclosed
- Review Platforms: scraper
- Source URLs: not disclosed
- Named Client Count: 0
- Case Study Entry Count: 1
- Proof URL Count: 0
- Red Flag Count: 0
- Risk Item Count: 0
- Normalized Fields: vendor_id, service_tags, industry_tags, geo_tags, pricing_range_min_usd, pricing_range_max_usd, comparison_vector
- Budget Compatibility: not disclosed
- Project Complexity Levels: not disclosed
- Competitor Positioning: not disclosed
- Third-Party Validations: not disclosed
- Service Tags: not disclosed
- Industry Tags: not disclosed
- Geo Tags: not disclosed
- Supported Client Types: not disclosed
- Client Type Compatibility: not disclosed
- Buyer Use Cases: not disclosed
- Not Recommended For: not disclosed
- Disqualifiers: not disclosed
- Scoring Explanation: not disclosed
- Score Drivers: not disclosed
- Score Penalties: not disclosed
- Profile Updated At: "2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"
- Last Verified At: "2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"
- Stale After: "2026-05-23T10:14:34.305Z"
- Needs Review: false
- Structured Sources: {"note":"Derived from existing imported vendor record.","field":"caseStudyEntries","source":"scraper","confidence":0.51,"evidenceType":"dataset_aggregate","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}; {"note":"Review totals exist on the vendor record; platform-level attribution pending.","field":"externalReviewSources","source":"scraper","confidence":0.51,"evidenceType":"dataset_aggregate","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}
- Structured Proof Details: {"type":"case_study_aggregate","count":18,"source":"scraper","normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}; {"type":"review_aggregate","count":55,"source":"scraper","normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:14:34.305Z"}
- Comparison Hints: not disclosed
- Open Questions: Normalize named clients from public case studies if available.; Replace aggregate review source with named review platforms during editorial verification.
- Unknowns: not disclosed
- Comparison Vectors: not disclosed
- Graph Links: vendor -> service -> industry
- Results Metrics Edges: not disclosed
- Reputation Nodes: not disclosed, scraper
- Risk Nodes: not disclosed, not disclosed