Primary Position: all proof and data on file
Every case, review and source Vendar holds, grouped by need. Filter by need, by work done, or by items checked against their source.
Every proof item on file for Primary Position: who said it, where and when.
- SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget0/2
- SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer0/2
- SEO Agencies with an In-house Team0/2
- SEO for Lead Generation0/1
- primaryposition.com3
- trustpilot.com1
Nothing matches these filters.
SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget
2Primary Position lists Instabase, an AI document understanding platform, as a client case study described as AI Document Management with a $2 billion valuation.
agency's own wordsprimaryposition.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026year of result not statedSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerSEO Agencies with an In-house Teamopen sourceshow the quote
AI Document Management, $2 Billion Valuation
Primary Position lists Orb as a client in an entry labeled an AI Billing SEO case study.
agency's own wordsprimaryposition.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerSEO Agencies with an In-house Teamopen sourceshow the quote
Orb - AI Billing SEO Case Study
SEO for Lead Generation
1Primary Position added significant value to KEMP's lead generation activity in 2012, meeting and exceeding all metrics set out in advance of the engagement. KEMP expressed happiness to continue the partnership into 2013.
agency's own wordsprimaryposition.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026show the quote
David and his company Primary Position have added significant value to our lead generation activity in 2012 and he has met and exceeded all the metrics set out in advance of our engagement. He is personable and obliging with his time. KEMP are very happy to continue the partnership into 2013
Services offered
1Service pages and pricing: what the agency sells, not what it has done
Source reference: trustpilot.com
outside sourcecheckedTrustpilot
Reviews from platforms that compete with Vendar are counted, but not linked; their sources are kept on file.
How complete and trustworthy this profile is
What stands behind the numbers, what is not collected yet, the AI feed, and how to correct the page.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served20/20
complete
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
complete
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10)7/30
1 cases with a named client and a result, 3 work claims
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews0/15
0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews; Trustpilot: too few reviews to count
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%)0/30
0 of 3 work claims are independent
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed19/25
3 confirmed, 0 partly, of 4 with a source
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source20/20
1 of 1
- Seen within the last 365 days11/15
3 of 4
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports10/10
0 not supported by their page
- Last verified
- n/a
- Re-check due
- Jan 31, 2027
The large number at the top is the score of the vendor's best position in a ranking: the number that orders it on that list. These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position. Rules: how Vendar ranks.
The collector adds these as its passes come online. Until then they are gaps, not zeros.
- Cross-source consistency
Team size, founding year, address and prices compared across the site, LinkedIn, directories and registries. Arrives with the collector's evidence pass.
- Change history
What changed on the profile and how the score moved per question, with the model version. Arrives with the monthly fast pass.
- Case quality grades
Client specificity, baseline and result, scale, causality and verifiability graded 0 to 3 with quotes. Arrives with ranking model 2026.11 after calibration.
- Measurements and buyer reports
Speed and uptime of delivered sites, visibility of named clients, response time to a quote request, and what buyers report 30 and 90 days after a shortlist.
The same facts, limits and citations are served as JSON. Readiness: candidate_only_with_caveat.
/ai/vendors/primary-position- None of the 3 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Only one third-party evidence claim is normalized.
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Primary Position can dispute any claim on this page or add evidence. Submitted evidence is recorded as claimed until Vendar checks it, and the dispute and its resolution stay on the profile. Buyers who spot an error can report it the same way.
Submit a correction or evidencePaid visibility never changes the content or the order of this page. Where a vendor has an active package it is disclosed below.