Relevance Advisors: all proof and data on file
Every case, review and source Vendar holds, grouped by need. Filter by need, by work done, or by items checked against their source.
Every proof item on file for Relevance Advisors: who said it, where and when.
- SEO Audit0/1
- SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget0/1
- SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer0/1
- SEO Agencies with an In-house Team0/1
- relevanceadvisors.com2
Nothing matches these filters.
SEO Audit
1Relevance Advisors reports that its SEO and analytics recommendations from an SEO audit, along with engagement tracking and keyword-optimized content, increased traffic to Lowe's Creative Ideas by 110%.
agency's own wordsrelevanceadvisors.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026year of result not statedSEO AuditSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerSEO Agencies with an In-house Teamopen sourceshow the quote
SEO & Analytics Recommendations from our comprehensive SEO audit increased traffic to Lowe's Creative Ideas by 110%. We also implemented ways to track online engagement and keyword-optimized content to better reflect the way Lowe's customers search for online content.
Other work done
1Cases and reviews outside the needs Vendar ranks
Relevance Advisors provided paid search for the Ovarian Cancer Research Alliance and helped it qualify for the Google Grants Pro program, earning up to $40,000 per month in Google AdWords value. The page says that this translated into over $3 million in AdWords value during the relationship and drove awareness and increased online donations for cancer research.
agency's own wordsrelevanceadvisors.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026year of result not statedopen sourceshow the quote
Ovarian Cancer Research Alliance Paid Search We helped the Ovarian Cancer Research Alliance qualify for the Google Grants Pro program, earning them up to $40,000 per month in Google AdWords value. That has translated into over $3 million in AdWords value during our relationship, which has driven awareness of the organization and increased online donations for cancer research.
Reviews from platforms that compete with Vendar are counted, but not linked; their sources are kept on file.
How complete and trustworthy this profile is
What stands behind the numbers, what is not collected yet, the AI feed, and how to correct the page.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served10/20
founding year, team size, logo
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
complete
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10)10/30
2 cases with a named client and a result, 2 work claims
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews0/15
0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%)0/30
0 of 2 work claims are independent
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed25/25
2 confirmed, 0 partly, of 2 with a source
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source20/20
2 of 2
- Seen within the last 365 days15/15
2 of 2
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports10/10
0 not supported by their page
- Last verified
- n/a
- Re-check due
- Feb 1, 2027
The large number at the top is the score of the vendor's best position in a ranking: the number that orders it on that list. These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position. Rules: how Vendar ranks.
The collector adds these as its passes come online. Until then they are gaps, not zeros.
- Cross-source consistency
Team size, founding year, address and prices compared across the site, LinkedIn, directories and registries. Arrives with the collector's evidence pass.
- Change history
What changed on the profile and how the score moved per question, with the model version. Arrives with the monthly fast pass.
- Case quality grades
Client specificity, baseline and result, scale, causality and verifiability graded 0 to 3 with quotes. Arrives with ranking model 2026.11 after calibration.
- Measurements and buyer reports
Speed and uptime of delivered sites, visibility of named clients, response time to a quote request, and what buyers report 30 and 90 days after a shortlist.
The same facts, limits and citations are served as JSON. Readiness: candidate_only_with_caveat.
/ai/vendors/relevance-advisors- None of the 2 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Fewer than three external evidence claims are normalized.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Relevance Advisors can dispute any claim on this page or add evidence. Submitted evidence is recorded as claimed until Vendar checks it, and the dispute and its resolution stay on the profile. Buyers who spot an error can report it the same way.
Submit a correction or evidencePaid visibility never changes the content or the order of this page. Where a vendor has an active package it is disclosed below.