Decision
93 / 100
Excellent Match
High confidence; AI confidence 78 / 100
Vendar AI decision profile
NYC ORM specialist for suppression, content removal support, review cleanup, and search-result repair.
93 / 100
Excellent Match
High confidence; AI confidence 78 / 100
adequate
11 normalized claims
7 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 internal route signals.
retainer
From $4,500/mo
official
first_partyclaimedofficialofficial
first_partyclaimedofficialReputation Pros Clutch profile
third_partyverifiedReputation Pros Clutch profileOfficial site includes a New York online reputation management page aligned with suppression and cleanup services.
unknownunverifiedreputationpros.comClutch lists Reputation Pros with 15 reviews but only 2 verified client reviews in the verification section, below the Vendar verified threshold.
third_partyverifiedclutch.coSource reference: clutch.co
third_partyverifiedClutchDedicated New York ORM service page
third_partyverifiedClutch 15 reviews
third_partyverified{
"schema_version": "vendar.ai.decision.v1",
"vendor": {
"id": "cmo2mfxm9008312woi4zzyral",
"slug": "reputation-pros",
"name": "Reputation Pros",
"website": "https://reputationpros.com/",
"tagline": "NYC ORM specialist for suppression, content removal support, review cleanup, and search-result repair.",
"company_type": "agency",
"headquarters_location": "New York, NY, USA",
"service_regions": [
"New York",
"USA"
],
"year_founded": null,
"team_size": "10-49"
},
"summary": {
"one_line": "NYC ORM specialist for suppression, content removal support, review cleanup, and search-result repair.",
"best_for": [
"Negative content removal",
"Reputation suppression",
"Search cleanup",
"Negative suppression",
"Content removal",
"SERP control",
"Buyers who need practical search-result suppression and cleanup support under one ORM vendor.",
"Cases where negative reviews, search results, and sensitive content all need coordinated handling.",
"New York buyers dealing with negative results, suppression work, deindexing-style cleanup, or search-attack handling.",
"SERM programs where pushing down harmful results matters more than broader PR coverage."
],
"not_for": [
"Buyers that only need a lightweight, one-location review reply workflow with no broader ORM requirement.",
"Proposal-stage diligence is still needed for exact scope",
"legal posture",
"and reporting cadence."
],
"buyer_use_cases": [
"Buyers who need practical search-result suppression and cleanup support under one ORM vendor.",
"Cases where negative reviews, search results, and sensitive content all need coordinated handling.",
"New York buyers dealing with negative results, suppression work, deindexing-style cleanup, or search-attack handling.",
"SERM programs where pushing down harmful results matters more than broader PR coverage."
]
},
"pricing": {
"pricing_model": "retainer",
"minimum_monthly_budget_usd": 4500,
"minimum_project_size_usd": null,
"typical_contract_value_usd": 9000,
"pricing_range_min_usd": 4500,
"pricing_range_max_usd": 9500,
"hourly_rate_range": null,
"setup_fee_usd": 750,
"contract_min_months": 3,
"contract_default_months": 6,
"pricing_known": true
},
"decision": {
"decision_score": 0.93,
"score_out_of_100": 93,
"verdict": {
"label": "Excellent Match",
"summary": "Exceptional buyer-facing and AI-ready coverage with very few visible gaps."
},
"confidence_label": "High confidence",
"score_breakdown": {
"human_audit_score": 0.88,
"ai_audit_score": 0.97,
"consistency_score": 0.91,
"trust_score": 0.88,
"performance_score": 0.97,
"expertise_score": 0.93,
"market_fit_score": 0.91
},
"score_drivers": [
"Specific ORM use cases are visible.",
"Commercial and workflow fields are structured for shortlist comparison.",
"Useful Clutch review presence."
],
"score_penalties": [
"Some pricing and performance expectations still require direct confirmation.",
"Only 2 verified client reviews, below threshold."
],
"why_recommended": [
"Direct fit for negative-search cleanup, deindexing-style work, and suppression briefs.",
"Good complement to more PR-heavy reputation vendors.",
"Strong match for suppression-led and cleanup-heavy SERM briefs.",
"One of the clearest fits for negative-result handling and search control in this NYC pool."
],
"why_not_recommended": [
"Not the best fit when the buyer mostly needs PR-heavy brand storytelling."
]
},
"evidence_posture": {
"label": "adequate",
"summary": "Usable for AI shortlist context, but still worth checking source details before outreach.",
"confidence_cap": 0.78,
"warnings": [],
"recommended_next_steps": []
},
"evidence_stats": {
"total_claims": 11,
"external_claims": 9,
"third_party_claims": 7,
"first_party_claims": 2,
"internal_signals": 0,
"verified_claims": 7,
"unique_source_urls": 3
},
"risks": {
"main_risks": [
"Complex legal or crisis-sensitive reputation matters still need proposal-stage confirmation on execution model."
],
"disqualifiers": [],
"unknowns": [],
"open_questions": [],
"needs_review": false,
"stale_after": "2026-07-26T00:00:00.000Z"
},
"alternatives": {
"comparison_hints": [
"Compare against adjacent New York ORM vendors for budget fit and specialty depth."
],
"manual_alternatives": [
"reputation-rhino",
"seo-image",
"rubenstein-communications"
]
},
"source_map": {
"human_profile": "https://www.vendar.org/vendors/reputation-pros",
"human_ai_profile": "https://www.vendar.org/vendors/reputation-pros/ai",
"machine_profile_json": "https://www.vendar.org/ai/vendors/reputation-pros",
"vendor_website": "https://reputationpros.com/",
"evidence_urls": [
"https://reputationpros.com/",
"https://reputationpros.com/new-york-online-reputation-management/",
"https://clutch.co/profile/reputation-pros"
]
}
}