Search Logic Pro
AI Vendor Profile — schema v2.0.0
Last updated: 2026-03-16 | Source coverage: 100%
Decision Signals
- Segment: mid_market, enterprise
- Min Budget: $5,000+/mo
- Complexity: High
- Engagement: retainer
- Pricing Model: retainer
- Geo: USA, Canada, UK
- Decision Score: 0.37
Summary
- Positioning: Enterprise search intelligence for regulated industries
- Best for: Enterprise SEO, International expansion, Regulated industries
- Not for: Minimum $5K/month retainer, No small-budget projects, 6-month minimum contract
- Strengths: Enterprise SEO, International expansion, 2 certifications, 81% client retention, 12 years experience
- Weaknesses: Minimum $5K/month retainer, No small-budget projects, 6-month minimum contract
- Problems solved: Scale international organic presence, Navigate compliance in search, Build enterprise content authority
Company
- Vendor ID: cmmtsloe5001smf27cjn1sv3b
- Name: Search Logic Pro
- HQ: Austin, USA
- Founded: 2012
- Team Size: 50-100
- Type: agency
- Languages: English, French, German
- Website: https://searchlogicpro.com
Services
- Category Taxonomy: Marketing -> SEO
- Normalized Services: seo
- seo: SEO (Marketing) — Enterprise SEO, International SEO
Match Logic
- Segments: mid_market, enterprise
- Industries: SaaS, Fintech, Healthcare
- Budget Range: $5,000 – $66,000 USD
- Geo Focus: USA, Canada, UK
- Recommended if: Needs enterprise seo; Needs international expansion; Needs regulated industries; Operates in SaaS; Operates in Fintech; Operates in Healthcare; Budget >= $5000/month; Based in or targeting USA; Based in or targeting Canada; Based in or targeting UK
- Avoid if: Minimum $5K/month retainer; No small-budget projects; 6-month minimum contract; Budget below $5000/month
Proof
- Case Studies: 28
- Client Reviews: 120
- Projects Completed: 350
- Client Retention: 81%
- Years of Experience: 12
- Certifications: Google Partner, Bing Partner
- Awards: Inc 5000 2023, Forbes Agency Council
- Average Rating: not disclosed
- Aggregated Rating Score: not disclosed
- External Review Count: not disclosed
- Named Clients: not disclosed
- Case Study Entries: {"note":"Aggregate case-study count normalized from existing vendor data.","type":"case_study_aggregate","count":28,"source":"seed","normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:23:36.498Z"}
- Review Sources: {"note":"Aggregate review total normalized from existing vendor data.","type":"aggregate_review_count","source":"seed","reviewCount":120,"normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:23:36.498Z"}
Decision Ready
- Profile Status: draft
- Service Depth: not disclosed
- Company Size Classification: not disclosed
- Delivery Staffing Model: not disclosed
- Reporting Frequency: not disclosed
- Minimum Monthly Budget: $5,000
- Average Contract Value: $22,000
- Typical Contract Value: $22,000
- Setup Fee: not disclosed
- Pricing Range: $5,000 - $22,000
- Contract Terms: 6 min / 6 default months
- Retention Length: not disclosed months
- Time to First Results: not disclosed - not disclosed days
- Time to Results: not disclosed - not disclosed days
- Expected Results: not disclosed
- KPI Targets: not disclosed
- Benchmark Ranges: not disclosed
- ROI Expectation: not disclosed
- KPI Metrics: not disclosed
- Workflow Stages: not disclosed
- Onboarding Steps: not disclosed
- Communication Model: not disclosed
- Key Specialists: not disclosed
- Proprietary Tools: not disclosed
- Competitive Advantages: not disclosed
- Why Choose vs Competitors: not disclosed
- Main Risks: not disclosed
- Known Weaknesses: not disclosed
- Negative Feedback: not disclosed
- When Choose Alternative: not disclosed
- Red Flags: not disclosed
- Why Recommended: not disclosed
- Why Not Recommended: not disclosed
- Tradeoffs: not disclosed
- Assumptions Used: minimumMonthlyBudgetUsd inferred from minimumProjectSize for retainer pricing until a monthly floor is explicitly verified.; typicalContractValueUsd inferred from averageProjectSize until contract value is directly verified.; pricingRangeMinUsd inferred from minimumProjectSize until a fuller range is verified.; pricingRangeMaxUsd inferred from averageProjectSize until a fuller range is verified.; contractMinMonths inferred from limitation text mentioning the minimum commitment length.
- Buyer Use Cases: not disclosed
- Not Recommended For: not disclosed
- Disqualifiers: not disclosed
- Budget Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Geo Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Complexity Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Scoring Explanation: not disclosed
- Score Drivers: not disclosed
- Score Penalties: not disclosed
- Supported Industries Matrix: not disclosed
- Success Rate: not disclosed
- Sentiment Score: not disclosed
- Negative Review Ratio: not disclosed
- Rating Volatility: not disclosed
- Risk Score: not disclosed
- Confidence Score: 0.59
- Data Completeness: 62%
- Source Reliability Score: 0.54
- Profile Updated At: "2026-03-24T10:23:36.498Z"
- Last Verified At: "2026-03-24T10:23:36.498Z"
- Stale After: "2026-06-22T10:23:36.498Z"
- Needs Review: false
- Sources: {"note":"Derived from the existing vendor record and awaiting source-level verification.","field":"caseStudyEntries","source":"seed","confidence":0.59,"evidenceType":"dataset_aggregate","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24T10:23:36.498Z"}; {"note":"Review totals exist on the vendor record; original public platforms still need normalization.","field":"externalReviewSources","source":"seed","confidence":0.59,"evidenceType":"dataset_aggregate","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24T10:23:36.498Z"}
- Proof Details: {"note":"Structured from existing aggregate case-study counts; source-by-source normalization still needed.","type":"case_study_aggregate","count":28,"source":"seed","normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:23:36.498Z","serviceScope":["SEO"]}; {"note":"Structured from existing aggregate review totals; platform-level attribution still needs normalization.","type":"review_aggregate","count":120,"source":"seed","normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:23:36.498Z"}
- Comparison Hints: not disclosed
- Open Questions: Normalize named clients from public case studies if available.; Replace aggregate review source with named review platforms during editorial verification.
- Unknowns: not disclosed
- Comparison Vector: not disclosed
- Graph Edges: not disclosed
Scoring
- Decision Score: 0.37
- Trust: 0.37
- Performance: 0.37
- Expertise: 0.37
- Market Fit: 1
- Method: trust*0.35 + performance*0.30 + expertise*0.20 + marketFit*0.15
- Confidence Modifier: 0.7
Verification
- Status: unverified
- Confidence: 0.7
- Source Coverage: 100%
- Fields Verified: 27/27
Audit Signals
- Alternatives: not disclosed
- Review Platforms: seed
- Source URLs: not disclosed
- Named Client Count: 0
- Case Study Entry Count: 1
- Proof URL Count: 0
- Red Flag Count: 0
- Risk Item Count: 0
- Normalized Fields: vendor_id, service_tags, industry_tags, geo_tags, pricing_range_min_usd, pricing_range_max_usd, comparison_vector
- Budget Compatibility: not disclosed
- Project Complexity Levels: not disclosed
- Competitor Positioning: not disclosed
- Third-Party Validations: not disclosed
- Service Tags: not disclosed
- Industry Tags: not disclosed
- Geo Tags: not disclosed
- Supported Client Types: not disclosed
- Client Type Compatibility: not disclosed
- Buyer Use Cases: not disclosed
- Not Recommended For: not disclosed
- Disqualifiers: not disclosed
- Scoring Explanation: not disclosed
- Score Drivers: not disclosed
- Score Penalties: not disclosed
- Profile Updated At: "2026-03-24T10:23:36.498Z"
- Last Verified At: "2026-03-24T10:23:36.498Z"
- Stale After: "2026-06-22T10:23:36.498Z"
- Needs Review: false
- Structured Sources: {"note":"Derived from the existing vendor record and awaiting source-level verification.","field":"caseStudyEntries","source":"seed","confidence":0.59,"evidenceType":"dataset_aggregate","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24T10:23:36.498Z"}; {"note":"Review totals exist on the vendor record; original public platforms still need normalization.","field":"externalReviewSources","source":"seed","confidence":0.59,"evidenceType":"dataset_aggregate","lastVerifiedAt":"2026-03-24T10:23:36.498Z"}
- Structured Proof Details: {"note":"Structured from existing aggregate case-study counts; source-by-source normalization still needed.","type":"case_study_aggregate","count":28,"source":"seed","normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:23:36.498Z","serviceScope":["SEO"]}; {"note":"Structured from existing aggregate review totals; platform-level attribution still needs normalization.","type":"review_aggregate","count":120,"source":"seed","normalizedAt":"2026-03-24T10:23:36.498Z"}
- Comparison Hints: not disclosed
- Open Questions: Normalize named clients from public case studies if available.; Replace aggregate review source with named review platforms during editorial verification.
- Unknowns: not disclosed
- Comparison Vectors: not disclosed
- Graph Links: vendor -> service -> industry
- Results Metrics Edges: not disclosed
- Reputation Nodes: not disclosed, seed
- Risk Nodes: not disclosed, not disclosed