Social Linus: all proof and data on file
Every case, review and source Vendar holds, grouped by need. Filter by need, by work done, or by items checked against their source.
Every proof item on file for Social Linus: who said it, where and when.
- SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget0/4
- SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer0/4
- SEO Agencies with an In-house Team0/4
- Local SEO0/1
- sociallinus.com6
Nothing matches these filters.
SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget
4Social Linus rebuilt Macrotek’s site. Ninety days later, the site had 35 sessions a day, and six months in, daily traffic was up 51%, organic search grew 73%, and organic social was up 194%. The results followed a website rebuild and subsequent content work.
agency's own wordssociallinus.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026year of result not statedSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerSEO Agencies with an In-house Teamopen sourceshow the quote
Macrotek’s old site wasn’t converting. Ninety days after we rebuilt it, it was doing 35 sessions a day, with roughly three out of four turning into a real action: a form fill, a call, a quote request. Not a redesign that just looks better. A site built to do something. That’s what the sprint gets you: a foundation that works from day one. The bigger payoff came after. Six months in, once the content was compounding on top of that foundation, daily traffic was up 51% from where it sat right after launch. Organic search grew 73%. Organic social nearly tripled, up 194%. The sprint builds the thing that’s worth putting content behind. It doesn’t skip the part where the content still has to happen.
Macrotek's local SEO work increased its keyword count from 50 to 900+ in 6 months.
agency's own wordssociallinus.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026Local SEOSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerSEO Agencies with an In-house Teamopen sourceshow the quote
Macrotek: 50 → 900+ keywords in 6 months
Social Linus redesigned Creative Sources' website and developed an SEO strategy; its rankings improved from page 20+ to Page 1 for its keywords. Within the first few months, the client received an inquiry through the new website and signed a $40,000 project.
agency's own wordssociallinus.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026year of result not statedSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerSEO Agencies with an In-house Teamopen sourceshow the quote
Social Linus helped us with our out of date website. With the redesigned website and SEO strategy our ranking went from page 20+ to Page 1 for our keywords. Within the first few months we received an inquiry through our new website and signed a $40,000 project.
Social Linus rebuilt Macrotek’s site. The page reports that monthly visitors increased from under 300 to 1,100+, with 120 keywords on page one.
agency's own wordssociallinus.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026year of result not statedSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerSEO Agencies with an In-house Teamopen sourceshow the quote
We rebuilt Macrotek’s site to be worth ranking. Monthly visitors went from under 300 to 1,100+, with 120 keywords on page one.
Other work done
2Cases and reviews outside the needs Vendar ranks
Social Linus built a new website for Creative Sources. The page says it brought in 377% more traffic and a $40K project through the contact form.
agency's own wordssociallinus.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026year of result not statedopen sourceshow the quote
Creative Sources ran on word-of-mouth for 20 years. Their new website brought in 377% more traffic, and a $40K project straight from the contact form.
Extended Stay reached #1 on Expedia with a 9.0 Wonderful rating through reputation management.
agency's own wordssociallinus.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026show the quote
Extended Stay: #1 on Expedia, 9.0 Wonderful
Reviews from platforms that compete with Vendar are counted, but not linked; their sources are kept on file.
How complete and trustworthy this profile is
What stands behind the numbers, what is not collected yet, the AI feed, and how to correct the page.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served10/20
founding year, team size, logo
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
complete
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee13/20
hourly rate, setup fee
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10)26/30
5 cases with a named client and a result, 6 work claims
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews0/15
0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%)0/30
0 of 6 work claims are independent
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed25/25
6 confirmed, 0 partly, of 6 with a source
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source20/20
4 of 4
- Seen within the last 365 days15/15
6 of 6
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports10/10
0 not supported by their page
- Last verified
- n/a
- Re-check due
- Feb 1, 2027
The large number at the top is the score of the vendor's best position in a ranking: the number that orders it on that list. These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position. Rules: how Vendar ranks.
The collector adds these as its passes come online. Until then they are gaps, not zeros.
- Cross-source consistency
Team size, founding year, address and prices compared across the site, LinkedIn, directories and registries. Arrives with the collector's evidence pass.
- Change history
What changed on the profile and how the score moved per question, with the model version. Arrives with the monthly fast pass.
- Case quality grades
Client specificity, baseline and result, scale, causality and verifiability graded 0 to 3 with quotes. Arrives with ranking model 2026.11 after calibration.
- Measurements and buyer reports
Speed and uptime of delivered sites, visibility of named clients, response time to a quote request, and what buyers report 30 and 90 days after a shortlist.
The same facts, limits and citations are served as JSON. Readiness: candidate_only_with_caveat.
/ai/vendors/social-linus- None of the 6 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Social Linus can dispute any claim on this page or add evidence. Submitted evidence is recorded as claimed until Vendar checks it, and the dispute and its resolution stay on the profile. Buyers who spot an error can report it the same way.
Submit a correction or evidencePaid visibility never changes the content or the order of this page. Where a vendor has an active package it is disclosed below.