6 AI search visibility claims on file: 1 third-party, 1 first-party, 4 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites
1 documented claim, 1 from an outside source · #1 in New York
68/100
best city score
AI search visibility Agencies with Documented Work
13 SEO agencies document AI search visibility work across Los Angeles and New York, out of 138 reviewed in those cities. Each one is here because a case study, portfolio entry or client review names the work, not because it sells the service.
Which SEO agencies have documented AI-search visibility work for businesses in these cities?
13 agencies with documented work138 reviewed across 6 citiesNo paid placements
1 AI search visibility claim on file: 1 third-party, 0 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
1 documented claim, 1 from an outside source · #1 in Los Angeles
66/100
best city score
5 AI search visibility claims on file: 1 third-party, 0 first-party, 4 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
1 documented claim, 1 from an outside source · #2 in New York
63/100
best city score
1 AI search visibility claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
0 documented claims · #2 in Los Angeles
59/100
best city score
1 AI search visibility claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
0 documented claims · #3 in Los Angeles
56/100
best city score
1 AI search visibility claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
0 documented claims · #4 in Los Angeles
56/100
best city score
1 AI search visibility claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
0 documented claims · #4 in New York
56/100
best city score
1 AI search visibility claim on file: 1 third-party, 0 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
1 documented claim, 1 from an outside source · #3 in New York
56/100
best city score
1 AI search visibility claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
0 documented claims · #5 in Los Angeles
52/100
best city score
1 AI search visibility claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
0 documented claims · #6 in Los Angeles
51/100
best city score
1 AI search visibility claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
0 documented claims · #7 in Los Angeles
50/100
best city score
1 AI search visibility claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
0 documented claims · #8 in Los Angeles
48/100
best city score
1 AI search visibility claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
0 documented claims · #9 in Los Angeles
46/100
best city score
City rankings for AI search visibility
The full explanation behind every place (the claims, their sources and what each agency is missing) lives on the city pages.
- AI search visibility in Los Angeles: 9 agencies ranked
- AI search visibility in New York: 4 agencies ranked
- AI search visibility in Chicago: 0 agencies ranked
- AI search visibility in Houston: 0 agencies ranked
- AI search visibility in Miami: 0 agencies ranked
- AI search visibility in Phoenix: 0 agencies ranked
How a place here is earned
- For an intent page, at least one claim on file supports the intent under the page's rubric, and at least one of those claims comes from a source outside Vendar. Our own service listings and profile tags describe the intent but document nothing, so they add weight to a vendor that already has outside evidence and never earn a rank on their own. Vendors without outside evidence appear below the ranking, unranked, never padded into it.
- For an intent page, at least one of those claims documents work the vendor has done: a case study, a project or portfolio entry, or a client review. Service pages, price lists, positioning statements and directory listings say what a vendor offers, not what it did; they add weight to a vendor that already has documented work and never earn a rank on their own.
- Rank order is the score, highest first. Ties break on evidence points, then on the number of third-party claims, then alphabetically.
The weights and the gate are published in full.
Questions this page answers
- What counts as AI search visibility evidence?
- A claim counts as AI-search evidence when a source on file names work aimed at generative answers: appearing or being cited in AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity or Claude answers, answer-engine or generative-engine optimisation, entity and knowledge-graph work, llms.txt and machine-readable feeds, or a measured change in AI citations. Reviews or case studies naming a specific assistant carry the most weight; a service page that merely offers the term does not. A Vendar service listing or profile tag never earns a rank on its own.
- How is this hub different from the city pages?
- This page merges the city rankings for AI search visibility into one national list and keeps each agency's best city result. The city pages rank the same evidence for one market at a time, with the full explanation behind every place.
- Do agencies pay to appear here?
- Paid visibility never changes the order of a listing.