Decision
71 / 100
Developing
Moderate confidence; AI confidence 84 / 100
Vendar AI decision profile
Los Angeles paid media shop blending social advertising, creator ecosystems, and performance-oriented media buying for larger campaigns.
71 / 100
Developing
Moderate confidence; AI confidence 84 / 100
strong
26 normalized claims
5 third-party, 15 first-party, 0 internal route signals.
retainer
From $12,000/mo
DASH TWO official site
first_partyclaimedDASH TWO official siteDASH TWO case-study archive
first_partyclaimedDASH TWO case-study archiveSoFi Stadium digital advertising case study
first_partyclaimedSoFi Stadium digital advertising case studySHEGLAM engagement marketing case study
first_partyclaimedSHEGLAM engagement marketing case studyAccesswire/Digital Journal milestone coverage
unknownunverifiedAccesswire/Digital Journal milestone coverageDASH TWO Clutch award article
third_partyverifiedDASH TWO Clutch award articleOfficial case-study archive positions DASH TWO around outdoor advertising and digital advertising for emerging brands, customized media strategy, ROI, conversions, and creative media buying.
first_partyclaimeddashtwo.comSoFi Stadium case study reports a campaign across Facebook, Instagram, Google, and Hulu for the Jimmy Kimmel LA Bowl, with estimated impressions, conversion value, and ticket-sales lift.
first_partyclaimeddashtwo.com{
"schema_version": "vendar.ai.decision.v1",
"vendor": {
"id": "cmny8y3ve00r2n2mtvwbnf06h",
"slug": "dash-two",
"name": "DASH TWO",
"website": "https://dashtwo.com/",
"tagline": "Los Angeles paid media shop blending social advertising, creator ecosystems, and performance-oriented media buying for larger campaigns.",
"company_type": "agency",
"headquarters_location": "Los Angeles, CA, USA",
"service_regions": [
"Los Angeles",
"California",
"USA"
],
"year_founded": null,
"team_size": "10-49"
},
"summary": {
"one_line": "Los Angeles paid media shop blending social advertising, creator ecosystems, and performance-oriented media buying for larger campaigns.",
"best_for": [
"Paid social",
"Media buying",
"Scaled customer acquisition",
"Los Angeles buyers looking for paid social, media buying, scaled customer acquisition."
],
"not_for": [
"Very low-budget briefs that need freelancer-style support only.",
"Service fit depends on budget",
"channel mix",
"and delivery model."
],
"buyer_use_cases": [
"Los Angeles buyers looking for paid social, media buying, scaled customer acquisition."
]
},
"pricing": {
"pricing_model": "retainer",
"minimum_monthly_budget_usd": 12000,
"minimum_project_size_usd": null,
"typical_contract_value_usd": 28000,
"pricing_range_min_usd": 12000,
"pricing_range_max_usd": 28000,
"hourly_rate_range": null,
"setup_fee_usd": null,
"contract_min_months": 3,
"contract_default_months": 6,
"pricing_known": true
},
"decision": {
"decision_score": 0.71,
"score_out_of_100": 71,
"verdict": {
"label": "Developing",
"summary": "Usable profile, but ranking confidence is limited until more gaps are closed."
},
"confidence_label": "Moderate confidence",
"score_breakdown": {
"human_audit_score": 0.68,
"ai_audit_score": 0.74,
"consistency_score": 0.9400000000000001,
"trust_score": 0.68,
"performance_score": 0.74,
"expertise_score": 0.71,
"market_fit_score": 0.9400000000000001
},
"score_drivers": [
"Official-service proof is present.",
"Core commercial fields are normalized.",
"Los Angeles service-region fit is explicit.",
"OOH/media-buying award context."
],
"score_penalties": [
"Buyers should still confirm exact staffing model, media ownership, and scope detail.",
"Award context is not review depth."
],
"why_recommended": [
"Official site clearly supports the service fit.",
"Profile includes enough structured data for shortlist comparison."
],
"why_not_recommended": [
"Very low-budget briefs that need freelancer-style support only."
]
},
"evidence_posture": {
"label": "strong",
"summary": "Strong enough for AI shortlist use with multiple independent and first-party signals.",
"confidence_cap": 0.95,
"warnings": [],
"recommended_next_steps": []
},
"evidence_stats": {
"total_claims": 26,
"external_claims": 20,
"third_party_claims": 5,
"first_party_claims": 15,
"internal_signals": 0,
"verified_claims": 5,
"unique_source_urls": 7
},
"risks": {
"main_risks": [
"Exact scope, staffing, and reporting should still be validated during outreach."
],
"disqualifiers": [],
"unknowns": [],
"open_questions": [
"Which media-buying fees, production costs, and ad spend are included in quoted campaign budgets?",
"Can the vendor provide post-campaign performance reports for the buyer's target channel mix?"
],
"needs_review": false,
"stale_after": "2026-07-26T00:00:00.000Z"
},
"alternatives": {
"comparison_hints": [
"Compare this profile against other Los Angeles vendors in the same service family to confirm budget fit, channel depth, and local-market relevance."
],
"manual_alternatives": []
},
"source_map": {
"human_profile": "https://www.vendar.org/vendors/dash-two",
"human_ai_profile": "https://www.vendar.org/vendors/dash-two/ai",
"machine_profile_json": "https://www.vendar.org/ai/vendors/dash-two",
"vendor_website": "https://dashtwo.com/",
"evidence_urls": [
"https://dashtwo.com/",
"https://dashtwo.com/new-case-study-archive-page-backend/",
"https://dashtwo.com/casestudy/sofi-stadium-digital-advertising-case-study/",
"https://dashtwo.com/casestudy/sheglam-engagement-marketing-case-study/",
"https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/news/accesswire/dash-two-spotlights-top-100-wild-posting-campaigns-in-the-last-15-years",
"https://dashtwo.com/blog/dash-two-on-clutch-2018-top-agencies/",
"https://reviews.ratingcaptain.com/630444/dashtwo-com"
]
}
}