LinkGraph
AI Vendor Profile — schema v2.0.0
Last updated: 2026-04-17 | Source coverage: 70%
Decision Signals
- Segment: mid_market, b2b, saas, in_house_team
- Min Budget: $5,000+/mo
- Complexity: Medium
- Engagement: retainer
- Pricing Model: retainer
- Geo: New York, USA, Manhattan
- Decision Score: 0.62
Summary
- Positioning: New York SEO and link building agency with strong technical, content, and authority-growth coverage.
- Best for: Technical SEO, Content-led, B2B / SaaS, Authority Links, Agencies for SaaS, New York link building, SaaS link building
- Not for: Less natural for ultra-small local-business retainers., May be heavier than necessary for buyers who only need simple local SEO execution.
- Strengths: Technical SEO, Content-led
- Weaknesses: Less natural for ultra-small local-business retainers., May be heavier than necessary for buyers who only need simple local SEO execution.
- Problems solved: Improved authority signals, Better technical SEO performance, More scalable organic growth
Company
- Vendor ID: cmo1gl6p30022tkqpjahl0gk0
- Name: LinkGraph
- HQ: New York, NY, USA
- Founded: unknown
- Team Size: 10-49
- Type: agency
- Languages: unknown
- Website: https://www.linkgraph.com/
Services
- Category Taxonomy: Marketing -> SEO | Marketing -> Link Building | Marketing -> Guest Posting | Marketing -> Niche Edits | Marketing -> Digital PR | Marketing -> Outreach | Marketing -> HARO | Marketing -> SaaS | Marketing -> Authority Links | Marketing -> High DR | Marketing -> Traffic-based
- Normalized Services: seo, link_building, guest_posting, niche_edits, digital_pr, outreach, haro, saas, authority_links, high_dr, traffic_based
- seo: SEO (Marketing) — SEO, Technical SEO, Content SEO
- link_building: Link Building (Marketing) — Authority Links, Link Building
- guest_posting: Guest Posting (Marketing)
- niche_edits: Niche Edits (Marketing)
- digital_pr: Digital PR (Marketing) — Digital PR
- outreach: Outreach (Marketing)
- haro: HARO (Marketing)
- saas: SaaS (Marketing)
- authority_links: Authority Links (Marketing) — Authority Links
- high_dr: High DR (Marketing)
- traffic_based: Traffic-based (Marketing)
Match Logic
- Segments: mid_market, b2b, saas, in_house_team
- Industries: B2B, SaaS, Ecommerce, Technology
- Budget Range: $5,000 – $36,000 USD
- Geo Focus: New York, USA, Manhattan
- Recommended if: Needs technical seo; Needs content-led; Needs b2b / saas; Needs authority links; Needs agencies for saas; Needs new york link building; Needs saas link building; Operates in B2B; Operates in SaaS; Operates in Ecommerce; Budget >= $5000/month; Based in or targeting New York; Based in or targeting USA; Based in or targeting Manhattan
- Avoid if: Less natural for ultra-small local-business retainers.; May be heavier than necessary for buyers who only need simple local SEO execution.; Budget below $5000/month
Proof
- Case Studies: 1
- Client Reviews: 0
- Projects Completed: 0
- Client Retention: unknown
- Years of Experience: unknown
- Certifications: none
- Awards: none
- Average Rating: not disclosed
- Aggregated Rating Score: 0.74
- External Review Count: not disclosed
- Named Clients: not disclosed
- Case Study Entries: {"summary":"Official homepage positions LinkGraph around SEO and link building expertise, supporting technical and authority-growth use cases.","sourceUrl":"https://www.linkgraph.com/"}
- Review Sources: not disclosed
Decision Ready
- Profile Status: decision_ready
- Service Depth: authority_growth_seo
- Company Size Classification: mid_market
- Delivery Staffing Model: not disclosed
- Reporting Frequency: monthly
- Minimum Monthly Budget: $5,000
- Average Contract Value: $12,000
- Typical Contract Value: $12,000
- Setup Fee: not disclosed
- Pricing Range: $5,000 - $12,000
- Contract Terms: 4 min / 6 default months
- Retention Length: 6 months
- Time to First Results: 45 - 120 days
- Time to Results: 45 - 120 days
- Expected Results: Improved authority signals; Better technical SEO performance; More scalable organic growth
- KPI Targets: Referring domains; Organic traffic; Non-brand rankings; Pipeline
- Benchmark Ranges: not disclosed
- ROI Expectation: not disclosed
- KPI Metrics: Traffic; Rankings; Links; Qualified leads
- Workflow Stages: Discovery and market audit; SEO roadmap and prioritization; Execution across technical, content, and local layers; Monthly reporting and iteration
- Onboarding Steps: Business and market intake; Analytics and Search Console access; Audit and opportunity map; Launch of the first execution sprint
- Communication Model: Email; Monthly calls; Shared reporting
- Key Specialists: not disclosed
- Proprietary Tools: not disclosed
- Competitive Advantages: not disclosed
- Why Choose vs Competitors: not disclosed
- Main Risks: Authority-building emphasis can make the commercial floor feel higher.; Best fit leans toward growth-stage or more ambitious organic programs.; Program fit should be validated if the buyer wants only lean local SEO support without broader authority work.
- Known Weaknesses: not disclosed
- Negative Feedback: not disclosed
- When Choose Alternative: not disclosed
- Red Flags: not disclosed
- Why Recommended: Official site positions LinkGraph around SEO and link building expertise, which maps well to technical and authority-led intents.; Strong fit for SaaS, content-led, and in-house team scenarios where execution depth matters.; Strong fit for authority-led link building with clearer SaaS and B2B alignment.; Profile is commercially complete enough for New York shortlist use.
- Why Not Recommended: not disclosed
- Tradeoffs: not disclosed
- Assumptions Used: not disclosed
- Buyer Use Cases: Technical SEO and authority growth for SaaS and B2B teams; Content-led SEO supported by link building and editorial systems; Enterprise or scale-up search programs needing specialist SEO depth; New York link building for SaaS and B2B brands that need stronger authority, digital PR, and scalable outreach.; Editorial link acquisition where publisher quality matters more than bulk volume.
- Not Recommended For: Very small local businesses needing only lightweight local SEO.; Buyers whose main need is a low-touch local listings vendor.; Buyers who only need low-cost local citations or bare-minimum link volume.
- Disqualifiers: not disclosed
- Budget Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Geo Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Complexity Mismatch Rules: not disclosed
- Scoring Explanation: This profile is scored on visible New York market relevance, service fit, commercial clarity, and proof quality.
- Score Drivers: Confirmed SEO service positioning on the official site; New York market relevance is explicit in the profile; Buyer use cases are clear enough for intent-based routing
- Score Penalties: Commercial scope still benefits from direct verification; Proof depth still benefits from ongoing enrichment
- Supported Industries Matrix: not disclosed
- Success Rate: 72%
- Sentiment Score: 0.72
- Negative Review Ratio: not disclosed
- Rating Volatility: not disclosed
- Risk Score: 0.27
- Confidence Score: 0.91
- Data Completeness: 90%
- Source Reliability Score: 0.95
- Profile Updated At: "2026-04-17T00:00:00.000Z"
- Last Verified At: "2026-04-17T00:00:00.000Z"
- Stale After: "2026-07-16T00:00:00.000Z"
- Needs Review: false
- Sources: {"url":"https://www.linkgraph.com/","label":"official"}
- Proof Details: {"note":"Official homepage positions LinkGraph around SEO and link building expertise, supporting technical and authority-growth use cases.","sourceUrl":"https://www.linkgraph.com/"}
- Comparison Hints: {"weakerWhen":["A different vertical, budget band, or delivery model is a better fit"],"strongerWhen":["The buyer needs a New York-relevant SEO partner","The use case matches the vendor's specialty"],"bestComparedWith":["Mimvi SEO","Sure Oak","SEO Image"]}
- Open Questions: not disclosed
- Unknowns: not disclosed
- Comparison Vector: not disclosed
- Graph Edges: not disclosed
Scoring
- Decision Score: 0.62
- Trust: 0.51
- Performance: 0.73
- Expertise: 0.62
- Market Fit: 0.78
- Method: trust*0.35 + performance*0.30 + expertise*0.20 + marketFit*0.15
- Confidence Modifier: 1
Verification
- Status: verified
- Confidence: 1
- Source Coverage: 70%
- Fields Verified: 19/27
- Missing: yearFounded, languages, certifications, awards, clientRetentionRate, yearsOfExperience, clientReviewsCount, projectsCompleted
Audit Signals
- Alternatives: not disclosed
- Review Platforms: not disclosed
- Source URLs: https://www.linkgraph.com/
- Named Client Count: 0
- Case Study Entry Count: 1
- Proof URL Count: 1
- Red Flag Count: 0
- Risk Item Count: 3
- Normalized Fields: vendor_id, service_tags, industry_tags, geo_tags, pricing_range_min_usd, pricing_range_max_usd, comparison_vector
- Budget Compatibility: {"band":"entry","maxUsd":12000,"minUsd":5000}
- Project Complexity Levels: technical; mid_market; regional; digital_pr; authority_links; outreach
- Competitor Positioning: not disclosed
- Third-Party Validations: not disclosed
- Service Tags: seo; seo; technical_seo; link_building; content_seo
- Industry Tags: b2b; saas; ecommerce; technology
- Geo Tags: new_york; usa; manhattan
- Supported Client Types: mid_market; b2b; saas; in_house_team
- Client Type Compatibility: mid_market; b2b; saas; in_house_team
- Buyer Use Cases: Technical SEO and authority growth for SaaS and B2B teams; Content-led SEO supported by link building and editorial systems; Enterprise or scale-up search programs needing specialist SEO depth; New York link building for SaaS and B2B brands that need stronger authority, digital PR, and scalable outreach.; Editorial link acquisition where publisher quality matters more than bulk volume.
- Not Recommended For: Very small local businesses needing only lightweight local SEO.; Buyers whose main need is a low-touch local listings vendor.; Buyers who only need low-cost local citations or bare-minimum link volume.
- Disqualifiers: not disclosed
- Scoring Explanation: This profile is scored on visible New York market relevance, service fit, commercial clarity, and proof quality.
- Score Drivers: Confirmed SEO service positioning on the official site; New York market relevance is explicit in the profile; Buyer use cases are clear enough for intent-based routing
- Score Penalties: Commercial scope still benefits from direct verification; Proof depth still benefits from ongoing enrichment
- Profile Updated At: "2026-04-17T00:00:00.000Z"
- Last Verified At: "2026-04-17T00:00:00.000Z"
- Stale After: "2026-07-16T00:00:00.000Z"
- Needs Review: false
- Structured Sources: {"url":"https://www.linkgraph.com/","label":"official"}
- Structured Proof Details: {"note":"Official homepage positions LinkGraph around SEO and link building expertise, supporting technical and authority-growth use cases.","sourceUrl":"https://www.linkgraph.com/"}
- Comparison Hints: {"weakerWhen":["A different vertical, budget band, or delivery model is a better fit"],"strongerWhen":["The buyer needs a New York-relevant SEO partner","The use case matches the vendor's specialty"],"bestComparedWith":["Mimvi SEO","Sure Oak","SEO Image"]}
- Open Questions: not disclosed
- Unknowns: not disclosed
- Comparison Vectors: not disclosed
- Graph Links: vendor -> service -> industry
- Results Metrics Edges: not disclosed
- Reputation Nodes: 0.74, not disclosed
- Risk Nodes: 0.27, not disclosed