Back to the MGMT Reputation profile

MGMT Reputation: all proof and data on file

Every case, review and source Vendar holds, grouped by need. Filter by need, by work done, or by items checked against their source.

All proof on file

Every proof item on file for MGMT Reputation: who said it, where and when.

9 of 9
9
proof items on file
2
from outside sources
2
describe work done
0
include a number
Who is speaking
outside sources 2the agency 7
What it says
work done 2services offered 7
Proof by need
outside / all
  • SEO Recovery0/1
Sources
4 sites
  • mgmtreputation.com6
  • google.com1
  • trustpilot.com1
  • no URL on file1

SEO Recovery

1

    • Dedicated Chicago reputation-management page supports local fit for suppression, removals, and broader ORM recovery programs.

      agency's own wordsmgmtreputation.com
      SEO Recoveryopen source

Other work done

2

Cases and reviews outside the needs Vendar ranks

    • Portfolio or case-study URL

      agency's own wordsmgmtreputation.com
      open source

    • Portfolio or case-study URL

      agency's own wordsmgmtreputation.com
      open source

Recognition from outside

1

Awards, certifications, media

    • Official ORM website

      agency's own wordsno URL on file

Services offered

5

Service pages and pricing: what the agency sells, not what it has done

    • Official site shows Chicago headquarters and positions MGMT Reputation around online reputation management, content removal, search cleanup, and monitoring.

      agency's own wordsmgmtreputation.com
      open source

    • MGMT Reputation has official ORM context but no qualifying verified buyer-review source in this pass.

      agency's own wordscheckedmgmtreputation.com · seen Apr 2026
      open source

    • MGMT Reputation's official site/contact pages list Chicago HQ, Buffalo, Seattle, and Nashville phone lines, content removal, search cleanup, and reputation-management services.

      agency's own wordsmgmtreputation.com · seen Jul 2026
      open source

    • Source reference: google.com

      outside sourcecheckedGoogle
      open source

    • Source reference: trustpilot.com

      outside sourcecheckedTrustpilot
      open source

Reviews from platforms that compete with Vendar are counted, but not linked; their sources are kept on file.

About the data

How complete and trustworthy this profile is

What stands behind the numbers, what is not collected yet, the AI feed, and how to correct the page.

How the two profile scores are computed
Data completeness61/100
  • Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served16/20

    founding year

  • Fit: services, industries, client types15/15

    complete

  • Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee13/20

    hourly rate, setup fee

  • Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10)2/30

    0 cases with a named client and a result, 2 work claims

  • Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews15/15

    2 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews

Trust in the data33/100
  • Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%)0/30

    0 of 2 work claims are independent

  • Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed0/25

    0 confirmed, 0 partly, of 8 with a source

  • Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source20/20

    0 of 0

  • Seen within the last 365 days3/15

    2 of 9

  • Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports10/10

    0 not supported by their page

Last verified
Jul 1, 2026
Re-check due
Oct 1, 2026

The large number at the top is the score of the vendor's best position in a ranking: the number that orders it on that list. These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position. Rules: how Vendar ranks.

Not collected yet

The collector adds these as its passes come online. Until then they are gaps, not zeros.

  • Cross-source consistency

    Team size, founding year, address and prices compared across the site, LinkedIn, directories and registries. Arrives with the collector's evidence pass.

  • Change history

    What changed on the profile and how the score moved per question, with the model version. Arrives with the monthly fast pass.

  • Case quality grades

    Client specificity, baseline and result, scale, causality and verifiability graded 0 to 3 with quotes. Arrives with ranking model 2026.11 after calibration.

  • Measurements and buyer reports

    Speed and uptime of delivered sites, visibility of named clients, response time to a quote request, and what buyers report 30 and 90 days after a shortlist.

For AI assistants

The same facts, limits and citations are served as JSON. Readiness: candidate_only_with_caveat.

/ai/vendors/mgmt-reputation
Required caveats
  • None of the 2 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
  • Complex legal or crisis-sensitive reputation matters still need proposal-stage confirmation on execution model.
  • Social-profile proof is weak relative to review platforms; validate client references, before/after evidence, and pay-after-removal terms directly.
Do not infer
  • Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
  • Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
  • Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Corrections and right of reply

MGMT Reputation can dispute any claim on this page or add evidence. Submitted evidence is recorded as claimed until Vendar checks it, and the dispute and its resolution stay on the profile. Buyers who spot an error can report it the same way.

Submit a correction or evidence

Paid visibility never changes the content or the order of this page. Where a vendor has an active package it is disclosed below.