Back to the Phoenix AI SEO profile

Phoenix AI SEO: all proof and data on file

Every case, review and source Vendar holds, grouped by need. Filter by need, by work done, or by items checked against their source.

All proof on file

Every proof item on file for Phoenix AI SEO: who said it, where and when.

5 of 5
5
proof items on file
1
from outside sources
4
describe work done
0
include a number
Who is speaking
outside sources 1the agency 4
What it says
work done 4services offered 1
Proof by need
outside / all
  • AI search visibility0/4
  • SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget0/4
  • SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer0/4
  • SEO Agencies with an In-house Team0/4
  • SEO for High-Ticket Services0/2
Sources
2 sites
  • aiseophoenix.com4
  • google.com1

AI search visibility

4
    • A roofing contractor in Chandler, AZ reported that Phoenix AI SEO identified zero-click traffic exposure and that within 90 days they were cited in Google AI Overviews for three of their highest-value service terms across the Phoenix Valley.

      agency's own wordsaiseophoenix.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026
      AI search visibilitySEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerSEO Agencies with an In-house Teamopen source
      show the quote
      “Phoenix AI SEO identified zero-click traffic exposure we didn’t even know we had. Within 90 days we were cited in Google AI Overviews for three of our highest-value service terms across the Phoenix Valley.”
    • A roofing contractor client in Chandler, AZ reports that Phoenix AI SEO identified zero-click traffic exposure and that within 90 days the client was cited in Google AI Overviews for three of its highest-value service terms across the Phoenix Valley. The client is identified only by industry and location, not by name.

      agency's own wordsaiseophoenix.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026
      AI search visibilitySEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerSEO Agencies with an In-house Teamopen source
      show the quote
      Phoenix AI SEO identified zero-click traffic exposure we didn't even know we had. Within 90 days we were cited in Google AI Overviews for three of our highest-value service terms across the Phoenix Valley.
    • A litigation firm in Downtown Phoenix, AZ reported that Phoenix AI SEO rebuilt its entity graph and that within four months Perplexity was citing the firm by name for personal injury attorney Phoenix queries.

      agency's own wordsaiseophoenix.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026
      AI search visibilitySEO for High-Ticket ServicesSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerSEO Agencies with an In-house Teamopen source
      show the quote
      “Our personal injury firm had strong organic rankings but we were invisible in AI search. Phoenix rebuilt our entity graph and within four months Perplexity was citing us by name for personal injury attorney Phoenix queries.”
    • A litigation firm client in Downtown Phoenix, AZ reports that Phoenix AI SEO rebuilt its entity graph and that within four months Perplexity was citing the firm by name for personal injury attorney Phoenix queries. The client is identified only by industry and location, not by name.

      agency's own wordsaiseophoenix.com · seen Nov 2026 · checked Nov 2026
      AI search visibilitySEO for High-Ticket ServicesSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerSEO Agencies with an In-house Teamopen source
      show the quote
      Our personal injury firm had strong organic rankings but we were invisible in AI search. Phoenix rebuilt our entity graph and within four months Perplexity was citing us by name for personal injury attorney Phoenix queries.

Services offered

1

Service pages and pricing: what the agency sells, not what it has done

    • Source reference: google.com

      outside sourcecheckedGoogle

Reviews from platforms that compete with Vendar are counted, but not linked; their sources are kept on file.

About the data

How complete and trustworthy this profile is

What stands behind the numbers, what is not collected yet, the AI feed, and how to correct the page.

How the two profile scores are computed
Data completeness40/100
  • Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served12/20

    founding year, team size

  • Fit: services, industries, client types15/15

    complete

  • Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee9/20

    model, hourly rate, setup fee

  • Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10)4/30

    0 cases with a named client and a result, 4 work claims

  • Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews0/15

    0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews; Google: too few reviews to count

Trust in the data62/100
  • Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%)0/30

    0 of 4 work claims are independent

  • Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed20/25

    4 confirmed, 0 partly, of 5 with a source

  • Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source20/20

    0 of 0

  • Seen within the last 365 days12/15

    4 of 5

  • Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports10/10

    0 not supported by their page

Last verified
n/a
Re-check due
Jan 31, 2027

The large number at the top is the score of the vendor's best position in a ranking: the number that orders it on that list. These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position. Rules: how Vendar ranks.

Not collected yet

The collector adds these as its passes come online. Until then they are gaps, not zeros.

  • Cross-source consistency

    Team size, founding year, address and prices compared across the site, LinkedIn, directories and registries. Arrives with the collector's evidence pass.

  • Change history

    What changed on the profile and how the score moved per question, with the model version. Arrives with the monthly fast pass.

  • Case quality grades

    Client specificity, baseline and result, scale, causality and verifiability graded 0 to 3 with quotes. Arrives with ranking model 2026.11 after calibration.

  • Measurements and buyer reports

    Speed and uptime of delivered sites, visibility of named clients, response time to a quote request, and what buyers report 30 and 90 days after a shortlist.

For AI assistants

The same facts, limits and citations are served as JSON. Readiness: candidate_only_with_caveat.

/ai/vendors/phoenix-ai-seo
Required caveats
  • None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
  • Only one third-party evidence claim is normalized.
Do not infer
  • Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
  • Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
  • Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Corrections and right of reply

Phoenix AI SEO can dispute any claim on this page or add evidence. Submitted evidence is recorded as claimed until Vendar checks it, and the dispute and its resolution stay on the profile. Buyers who spot an error can report it the same way.

Submit a correction or evidence

Paid visibility never changes the content or the order of this page. Where a vendor has an active package it is disclosed below.