Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #11 SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget in Phoenix, of 20 · also in 10 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google5.0/52 reviews as of Nov 2, 2026- 100% written in the last 12 months
- 0% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 100% of Google reviews answered
Clients praise the team and the agency's ability to secure citations in AI search results like Google AI Overviews and Perplexity. No criticisms were mentioned. Reviews are consistent, though two testimonials are duplicated from the same clients.More
- Team quality2
- Zero-click traffic identification2
- Google AI Overview citations2
- Entity graph rebuilding2
- Perplexity citations2
“Mike and Justin have been great!”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“Phoenix AI SEO identified zero-click traffic exposure we didn’t even know we had.”
“Within 90 days we were cited in Google AI Overviews for three of our highest-value service terms across the Phoenix Valley.”
“Phoenix rebuilt our entity graph”
“within four months Perplexity was citing us by name for personal injury attorney Phoenix queries.”
No criticism in the 2 reviews read.
- AI search optimization2
- Entity graph building2
- roofing contractor
- personal injury law firm
Show 4 named client quotesHide named client quotes
““Phoenix AI SEO identified zero-click traffic exposure we didn’t even know we had. Within 90 days we were cited in Google AI Overviews for three of our highest-value service terms across the Phoenix Valley.””
““Our personal injury firm had strong organic rankings but we were invisible in AI search. Phoenix rebuilt our entity graph and within four months Perplexity was citing us by name for personal injury attorney Phoenix queries.””
“Phoenix AI SEO identified zero-click traffic exposure we didn't even know we had. Within 90 days we were cited in Google AI Overviews for three of our highest-value service terms across the Phoenix Valley.”
“Our personal injury firm had strong organic rankings but we were invisible in AI search. Phoenix rebuilt our entity graph and within four months Perplexity was citing us by name for personal injury attorney Phoenix queries.”
- Your business matches the client types on file (small businesses, local businesses) and the industries on file (local services).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: AI search optimization (2 of 4 mentions); Entity graph building (2).
- You need the setup fee in writing before you commit: it is not published.
Starting price is above the median of ranked agencies for this question.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Little outside recognition on file: fewer than two awards, certifications or press mentions with a source.
- Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #10 Mode Effect57Ranks above on this question#10#11 this oneScore5755Independent00PriceProjects from $1,000From $1,500 per monthModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #12 Search Control55Ranks below on this question#12#11 this oneScore5555Independent00PriceFrom $500/monthFrom $1,500 per monthModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Phoenix AI SEO.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#11 SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget in Phoenix: 55/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 14.3 | 48% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 18.4 | 74% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 15 | 100% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparency | 10 | 5 | 50% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 1.2 | 24% |
|
| Market credibilityweakest | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed4 of 5 on file · 0 of 4 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 5 claims on file: independent source 1 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 4. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 2 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: AI search visibility 4 · SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget 4 · SEO for High-Ticket Services 2. The full ledger of 5 is on the proof page.
A roofing contractor in Chandler, AZ reported that Phoenix AI SEO identified zero-click traffic exposure and that within 90 days they were cited in Google AI Overviews for three of their highest-value service terms across the Phoenix Valley.
Agency's own wordsaiseophoenix.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workWithin 90 daysAI search visibilitySEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetQuote from the source page
“Phoenix AI SEO identified zero-click traffic exposure we didn’t even know we had. Within 90 days we were cited in Google AI Overviews for three of our highest-value service terms across the Phoenix Valley.”
A roofing contractor client in Chandler, AZ reports that Phoenix AI SEO identified zero-click traffic exposure and that within 90 days the client was cited in Google AI Overviews for three of its highest-value service terms across the Phoenix Valley. The client is identified only by industry and location, not by name.
Agency's own wordsaiseophoenix.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workwithin 90 daysAI search visibilitySEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetQuote from the source page
Phoenix AI SEO identified zero-click traffic exposure we didn't even know we had. Within 90 days we were cited in Google AI Overviews for three of our highest-value service terms across the Phoenix Valley.
A litigation firm in Downtown Phoenix, AZ reported that Phoenix AI SEO rebuilt its entity graph and that within four months Perplexity was citing the firm by name for personal injury attorney Phoenix queries.
Agency's own wordsaiseophoenix.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workWithin four monthsAI search visibilitySEO for High-Ticket ServicesSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetQuote from the source page
“Our personal injury firm had strong organic rankings but we were invisible in AI search. Phoenix rebuilt our entity graph and within four months Perplexity was citing us by name for personal injury attorney Phoenix queries.”
A litigation firm client in Downtown Phoenix, AZ reports that Phoenix AI SEO rebuilt its entity graph and that within four months Perplexity was citing the firm by name for personal injury attorney Phoenix queries. The client is identified only by industry and location, not by name.
Agency's own wordsaiseophoenix.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workwithin four monthsAI search visibilitySEO for High-Ticket ServicesSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetQuote from the source page
Our personal injury firm had strong organic rankings but we were invisible in AI search. Phoenix rebuilt our entity graph and within four months Perplexity was citing us by name for personal injury attorney Phoenix queries.
Positions in every ranking11 rankings
11 positions: 11 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget · Phoenixon its own published cases | #11 of 20 | 55 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| AI search visibility · Dallason its own published cases | #14 of 51 | 49 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| AI search visibility · Chicagoon its own published cases | #17 of 51 | 49 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| AI search visibility · New Yorkon its own published cases | #17 of 51 | 49 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| AI search visibility · Phoenixon its own published cases | #8 of 51 | 55 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
6 more positionsHide the other 6
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI search visibility · Atlantaon its own published cases | #14 of 51 | 49 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| AI search visibility · Miamion its own published cases | #14 of 51 | 49 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| AI search visibility · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #14 of 51 | 49 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| AI search visibility · Seattleon its own published cases | #14 of 51 | 49 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| AI search visibility · Houstonon its own published cases | #16 of 51 | 49 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| SEO for High-Ticket Services · Phoenixon its own published cases | #11 of 28 | 48 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Scottsdale, AZ, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Phoenix, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- small_business, local_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- Local ServicesVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Roofing Contractor, Litigation FirmIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullFrom $1,500 per month
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- $1,500 per month
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- 1 month (month to month)
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Agency's own words. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Inside the SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget band (up to $6,000/month).
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget $1,498 (20 of 20 disclose) · SEO for High-Ticket Services $1,495 (17 of 28 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose)
Reputation
- Google5 · 2 reviews
How it counts: 2 third-party reviews at 5.0. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size12/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, hourly rate, setup fee9/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 4 work claims4/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews; Google: too few reviews to count0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 4 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 4 confirmed, 0 partly, of 5 with a source20/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 4 of 512/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names AI search visibility work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Never verified against official sources.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Only one third-party evidence claim is normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 4 of 5 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 1 come from an independent source.
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (4 of 5)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 4 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: At least three named clients (2 named)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (2 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.