No published ranking admits this vendor on documented work yet; the profile shows what is on file.
Not in any evidence-ranked listing yet: no independent claim documents work for a published need.
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google4.9/528 reviews as of Nov 2, 2026- 4% written in the last 12 months
- 0% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 64% of Google reviews answered
Clients consistently praise 222 Digital Marketing for responsiveness, expertise, and personal attention. They report strong results like top Google rankings, increased traffic, and new clients. No criticisms appear in any review.More
- Responsiveness7
- Knowledge and expertise5
- Personalized attention5
- Communication and transparency3
- Creativity2
“Brian is quick to respond to phone calls, emails and any needs I might have.”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“Brian is incredibly knowledgeable in digital marketing.”
“When you hire him you get his undivided attention.”
“They keep a tight watch on how your website is driving business for you, and inform you on the progress.”
“Love his creativity and artistic talent.”
No criticism in the 25 reviews read.
Show 2 more resultsHide results
- Website design and development4
- SEO and traffic generation3
- Social media marketing1
- Online brand building1
- General digital marketing1
Show 5 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“I have been working with 222 Digital marketing for over a year now”
“I recently launched my own career coaching site and needed to understand the world of SEO and how to begin marketing my new business.”
“I have been working with 222 Digital marketing for over a year now, and I can not say enough good things! They are so responsive to any questions, concerns, or changes to my website. They keep a tight watch on how your website is driving business for you, and inform you on the progress.”
“222 Digital Marketing has helped my business gain greater exposure in the market place. They have helped me with my social media so I don't have to worry about that getting done throughout the month - it's done!”
“Brian had helped me optimize my website and increase user views and inter”
- Your business matches the client types on file (small businesses) and the industries on file (smb).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Website design and development (4 of 10 mentions); SEO and traffic generation (3).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
Price not disclosed. Ask for a quote and the minimum term.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
Not ranked yet, so there are no ranking neighbours to compare with.
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for 222 Digital Marketing.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterionNot ranked
No score yet: 222 Digital Marketing is not admitted to any evidence-ranked listing. The score appears with the first independent claim that documents work for a published need.
All claims in the feed5 of 6 on file · 0 of 5 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 6 claims on file: independent source 1 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 5. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 4 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: none tagged to a ranked need. The full ledger of 6 is on the proof page.
Client Lauren Schultz states she has worked with 222 Digital Marketing for over a year, describing ongoing website support and monitoring of how the website drives business.
Agency's own words222digitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workover a yearQuote from the source page
I have been working with 222 Digital marketing for over a year now, and I can not say enough good things! They are so responsive to any questions, concerns, or changes to my website. They keep a tight watch on how your website is driving business for you, and inform you on the progress.
A testimonial from Robin Carretta describes her launch of a career coaching site and her need to understand SEO and begin marketing the new business.
Agency's own words222digitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
I recently launched my own career coaching site and needed to understand the world of SEO and how to begin marketing my new business.
Client Lauren Schultz states she has worked with 222 Digital Marketing for over a year, describing responsive communication and monitoring of how her website drives business; the testimonial does not name a specific service or measurable result.
Agency's own words222digitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
I have been working with 222 Digital marketing for over a year now
Client Sharon Lynch states that 222 Digital Marketing managed her social media on a monthly basis and helped her business gain greater exposure.
Agency's own words222digitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
222 Digital Marketing has helped my business gain greater exposure in the market place. They have helped me with my social media so I don't have to worry about that getting done throughout the month - it's done!
A client named Nicole Marie says in a testimonial that Brian helped her optimize her website and increase user views.
Agency's own words222digitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Brian had helped me optimize my website and increase user views and inter
Positions in every ranking0 rankings
Not admitted to any ranking yet.
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Chicago, IL, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Chicago, IL, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- smbVendar profile field
- Industries
- SMBVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Lauren Schultz, Robin Carretta, Sharon Lynch, Nicole MarieIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Reputation
- Google4.9 · 28 reviews
How it counts: reputation is weighted 5 of 100 and discounted when few reviews are on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2008Agency's own words
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- n/a
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: team size16/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 1 cases with a named client and a result, 5 work claims9/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 1 platform with a rating and 10 or more reviews8/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 5 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 5 confirmed, 0 partly, of 6 with a source21/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 5 of 613/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Only one third-party evidence claim is normalized.
- 5 of 6 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 1 come from an independent source.
- Open: Decision layer complete: score, verdict, reason, best position (not ranked)
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (1 of 3)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (5 of 6)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 5 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (team size missing)
- Open: JSON-LD carries Vendar's rating as a Review and an absolute logo (built from the same view; checked on the live page by QA)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.