No published ranking admits this vendor on documented work yet; the profile shows what is on file.
Not in any evidence-ranked listing yet: no independent claim documents work for a published need.
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
Published on the agency's own site. Each quote carries a badge saying where it comes from.
Clients describe positive experiences with SEO rankings, marketing strategy and profitable advertising, with one also reporting YouTube as a major traffic source. All reviews are positive, though two repeat the same SEO testimonial, and none mention criticisms.More
- SEO rankings and staying power2
- Clear strategy and delivery1
- Profitable PPC1
- Understanding the client's business1
“Rankings have held since.”
Show 3 more quotesHide quotes
“He laid out exactly how it would work before we signed — then delivered exactly what he promised.”
“turned our Adwords spend into a consistently profitable channel.”
“He knew my business before we started.”
No criticism in the quotes read.
- SEO2
- SMO1
- PPC1
- Video marketing1
- E-commerce business
- SaaS company
- Local services business
- B2B services business
Show 5 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“Chris took my business to the top on 10 high-traffic keywords in less than six months. Rankings have held since. That is not a coincidence — that is a system.”
“His SMO strategy was better than anything an agency had pitched me. He laid out exactly how it would work before we signed — then delivered exactly what he promised.”
“PPC was the only hope I had for fast revenue. Chris's team turned our Adwords spend into a consistently profitable channel. We've been together a year now.”
“Video marketing is different from traditional SEO — Chris understood that immediately. He knew my business before we started. YouTube is now one of our top three traffic sources.”
“Chris took my business to the top on 10 high-traffic keywords in less than six months. Rankings have held since.”
- Your business matches the client types on file (ecommerce brands, SaaS companies, local service businesses) and the industries on file (ecommerce, saas, local services).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: SEO (2 of 5 mentions); SMO (1).
- You need the setup fee in writing before you commit: it is not published.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask who will do the work day to day and whether any of it is outsourced.
Not ranked yet, so there are no ranking neighbours to compare with.
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Chris Brown SEO.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterionNot ranked
No score yet: Chris Brown SEO is not admitted to any evidence-ranked listing. The score appears with the first independent claim that documents work for a published need.
All claims in the feed5 of 5 on file · 0 of 5 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 5 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 5. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 1 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: none tagged to a ranked need. The full ledger of 5 is on the proof page.
A client identified as Scott Jackson, E-Commerce, Miami, FL, states that Chris Brown SEO took his business to the top on 10 high-traffic keywords in less than six months and that rankings have held since.
Agency's own wordschrisbrownseoservices.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Chris took my business to the top on 10 high-traffic keywords in less than six months. Rankings have held since. That is not a coincidence, that is a system.
Scott Jackson, an e-commerce client in Miami, FL, states the vendor took his business to the top on 10 high-traffic keywords in less than six months and that rankings have held since.
Agency's own wordschrisbrownseoservices.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Chris took my business to the top on 10 high-traffic keywords in less than six months. Rankings have held since.
A client identified as Brett Scottly, SaaS Founder, California, states that Chris Brown SEO delivered an SMO (social media optimization) strategy that he says was better than anything an agency had pitched him.
Agency's own wordschrisbrownseoservices.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
His SMO strategy was better than anything an agency had pitched me. He laid out exactly how it would work before we signed, then delivered exactly what he promised.
A client identified as Peter, B2B Services, California, states that after working with Chris Brown SEO on video marketing, YouTube is now one of his top three traffic sources.
Agency's own wordschrisbrownseoservices.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Video marketing is different from traditional SEO, Chris understood that immediately. He knew my business before we started. YouTube is now one of our top three traffic sources.
A client identified as Marry, Local Services, Miami, FL, states that Chris Brown SEO's PPC team turned her Adwords spend into a consistently profitable channel, and that the relationship has lasted a year.
Agency's own wordschrisbrownseoservices.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workWe've been together a year nowQuote from the source page
PPC was the only hope I had for fast revenue. Chris's team turned our Adwords spend into a consistently profitable channel. We've been together a year now.
Positions in every ranking0 rankings
Not admitted to any ranking yet.
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Miami, FL, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Miami, FL, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- ecommerce, saas, local_service_business, b2bVendar profile field
- Industries
- Ecommerce, SaaS, Local Services, B2BVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Scott Jackson, SaaS Founder * California, Peter, B2B Services * California, MarryIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullFrom $499 per month, retainer
- Model
- retainer
- Minimum monthly budget
- $499 per month
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- 1 month (month to month)
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Agency's own words. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: reputation is weighted 5 of 100 and discounted when few reviews are on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- n/a
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: hourly rate, setup fee13/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 2 cases with a named client and a result, 5 work claims13/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 5 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 5 confirmed, 0 partly, of 5 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 2 of 220/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 5 of 515/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Only one external source URL is exposed.
- 5 of 5 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Decision layer complete: score, verdict, reason, best position (not ranked)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 5 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: JSON-LD carries Vendar's rating as a Review and an absolute logo (built from the same view; checked on the live page by QA)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (1 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.