Ranks in the top three for at least one question. Most of its claims match the sources they cite. None of its 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #1 Local SEO in Dallas, of 14 · also in 6 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file (small businesses, local businesses) and the industries on file (healthcare, legal, home services).
- You need the setup fee in writing before you commit: it is not published.
Starting price is at the median of ranked agencies for this question.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Few outside reviews mention Local SEO work specifically.
- Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for a Local SEO case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
Dallas SEO Agency leads this ranking. The next two places:
- #2 DFW Website SEO47Ranks below on this question#2#1 this oneScore4748Independent00Pricenot disclosedFrom $750 per monthModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #3 Mantas Auk47Ranks below on this question#3#1 this oneScore4748Independent00PriceFrom $500/monthFrom $750 per monthModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Dallas SEO Agency.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#1 Local SEO in Dallas: 48/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 9 | 30% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 25 | 100% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 10.6 | 71% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparency | 10 | 5 | 50% |
|
| Reputationweakest | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed5 of 5 on file · 0 of 5 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 5 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 5. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 3 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Local SEO 1 · Technical SEO 1 · SEO for Lead Generation 1 · SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget 4. The full ledger of 5 is on the proof page.
The agency rebuilt a plumbing company's Google Business Profile, fixed site speed, and targeted urgent mobile searches. The company went from 10 website calls a month to around 90+ calls a month within 4 months; its Google rating climbed from 36 to 81 stars.
Agency's own wordsseoagencycity.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workwithin 4 monthsLocal SEOQuote from the source page
Before: 10 calls a month from the website. As a Dallas local SEO company, we rebuilt their Google Business Profile, fixed site speed, and targeted urgent, mobile “near me” searches. Result: around 90+ calls a month within 4 months, with a Google rating climbing from 36 to 81 stars.
The agency performed a technical SEO rebuild and local citation work for an HVAC contractor serving Plano and Frisco. The contractor achieved first-page rankings for its top 10 keywords within 6 months and a documented 170% increase in revenue tied directly to organic leads.
Agency's own wordsseoagencycity.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workwithin 6 monthsTechnical SEOSEO for Lead GenerationSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetQuote from the source page
Before: buried past page two for their core service terms. Full technical SEO Dallas TX rebuild, plus local citation work across both suburbs. Result: first-page rankings for their top 10 keywords within 6 months, and a documented 170% increase in revenue tied directly to organic leads.
The portfolio reports 381K clicks, 2.01M impressions, and an average position of 5.2 over 3 months for an unnamed website. The page does not identify the client or specify the SEO work performed.
Agency's own wordsseoagencycity.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes work3 monthsSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetQuote from the source page
381K clicks · 2.01M impressions · avg. position 5.2 · 3 months
An online deals store project is listed with a mobile speed score increase from 32 to 93.
Agency's own wordsseoagencycity.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetQuote from the source page
Online deals store Mobile speed score 32 → 93. See what we fixed.
A martial arts gym project is listed with a mobile speed score increase from 5 to 70.
Agency's own wordsseoagencycity.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetQuote from the source page
Martial arts gym Mobile speed score 5 → 70. See what we fixed.
Positions in every ranking7 rankings
7 positions: 7 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget · Dallason its own published cases | #3 of 5 | 48 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| Local SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #1 of 14 | 48 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| Technical SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #2 of 10 | 43 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO for Lead Generation · Dallason its own published cases | #8 of 18 | 43 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| Technical SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #80 of 115 | 34 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
2 more positionsHide the other 2
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #79 of 116 | 34 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| Technical SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #79 of 115 | 34 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Dallas, TX, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Dallas, TX, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- small_business, local_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- Healthcare, Legal, Home Services, AccountingVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Online deals store, Martial arts gymIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullFrom $750 per month
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- $750 per month
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- 1 month (month to month)
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Agency's own words. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Inside the Local SEO band (up to $6,000/month).
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Local SEO $750 (3 of 14 disclose) · Technical SEO $1,625 (2 of 10 disclose) · SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget $750 (5 of 5 disclose) · SEO for Lead Generation $750 (6 of 18 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 116 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, hourly rate, setup fee9/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 5 work claims5/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 5 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 5 confirmed, 0 partly, of 5 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 2 of 220/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 5 of 515/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names local SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 5 of 5 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 5 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: At least three named clients (2 named)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.