Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 11 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #6 Technical SEO in Dallas, of 10 · also in 4 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file (B2B companies, B2C brands, healthcares) and the industries on file (saas, healthcare, education).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 11 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for a Technical SEO case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #5 Connect Media Agency34Ranks above on this question#5#6 this oneScore3434Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #7 Ronkot Design32Ranks below on this question#7#6 this oneScore3234Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Digital Success.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#6 Technical SEO in Dallas: 34/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 8 | 27% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 19 | 76% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 9.1 | 61% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed11 of 11 on file · 0 of 11 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 11 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 11. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 4 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Technical SEO 1 · SEO for Lead Generation 2. The full ledger of 11 is on the proof page.
For one global SaaS employee-engagement platform, Digital Success increased organic traffic by 1,245% in 12 months, from 549 to 7,382 monthly sessions. Top-10 Google keyword rankings grew from 6 to 177 through technical SEO improvements, content optimization, internal linking, and page-level performance analysis; the results reflect this combined work.
Agency's own wordsdigitalsuccess.usclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin 12 monthsTechnical SEOQuote from the source page
For one global SaaS employee-engagement platform, Digital Success increased organic traffic by 1,245% in 12 months , from 549 to 7,382 monthly sessions. The campaign also grew top-10 Google keyword rankings from 6 to 177 through technical SEO improvements, content optimization, internal linking, and page-level performance analysis.
The page lists a 300% increase in blog traffic for eno8 in 90 days.
Agency's own wordsdigitalsuccess.usclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin 90 daysQuote from the source page
eno8 +300% Increased blog traffic in 90 days
The page lists a 178% increase in website traffic for Anything Cloud in three months.
Agency's own wordsdigitalsuccess.usclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin flat 3 monthsQuote from the source page
Anything Cloud 178% increased website traffic in flat 3 months
The page lists a 242% increase in organic traffic for MoldLab.
Agency's own wordsdigitalsuccess.usclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
MoldLab +242% Increase in organic traffic
Britt says Digital Success Agency helped increase traffic to the site and suggested content improvements during its SEO efforts.
Agency's own wordsdigitalsuccess.usclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
We are grateful for the guidance we received from Digital Success Agency with our SEO efforts. Not only did they help increase traffic to our site, they also made suggestions for improvements so that we could enhance our content.
Daniel says clients managed by the vendor grew their traffic, keyword rankings, and leads. The quote does not name those clients or give a result period.
Agency's own wordsdigitalsuccess.usclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workover the last few yearsSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
“You have been by far the best outside resources I've worked with for SEO and it's reflected in the clients you managed - all grew their traffic, keyword rankings, and leads under you. You've been a big help for me over the last few years and I really appreciate it.”
Digital Success ran an SEO and content campaign for ERGOS after its branding and web design changed, aiming to generate more leads for IT outsourcing.
Agency's own wordsdigitalsuccess.usclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
Digital Success ran an SEO and content campaign for ERGOS after the company changed its branding and web design. The documented work covered meta data on all pages with new content, fixes for 404 errors and duplicate content, social bookmarking and directory listings, and guest blogging and link opportunities, all aimed at generating more leads for IT outsourcing.
The page lists a 14% ROI in the first year for EMS Imaging.
Agency's own wordsdigitalsuccess.usclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin the first yearQuote from the source page
EMS Imaging 14% ROI in the first year
Tom describes a November-to-December period when overall traffic was even, while PPC numbers were lower as intended. The quote does not attribute the result to a particular service.
Agency's own wordsdigitalsuccess.usclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workNovember to DecemberQuote from the source page
“Things are looking good. The influence of the top ten looks great and it appears we were even in terms of overall traffic from November to December aside from lower PPC numbers which is what we are attempting to do. Nice work. I am excited to see how things shake out when our busy season starts to really take off. Thanks again to you and the team.”
Chuck says the SEO and PPC partnership had paid off after four years, without specifying the results.
Agency's own wordsdigitalsuccess.usclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workFour years agoQuote from the source page
“The Digital Success Agency team is knowledgeable and hard working; just what we need from a strategic partner as we look to grow our business. I would recommend them for your SEO and PPC needs without hesitation. Four years ago we made that decision and it's paid off nicely!”
The page lists a five-times increase in Twitter followership for Corner Station.
Agency's own wordsdigitalsuccess.usclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Corner Station +5 times increase in Twitter followership
Positions in every ranking5 rankings
5 positions: 5 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO for Lead Generation · Dallason its own published cases | #16 of 18 | 37 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #6 of 10 | 34 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #103 of 115 | 25 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #104 of 115 | 25 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #105 of 116 | 25 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Dallas, TX, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Dallas, TX, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- b2b, b2c, healthcare, franchise, education, legal, saas, small_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- SaaS, Healthcare, Education, Franchise, LawVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- eno8, Anything Cloud, EMS Imaging, MoldLab, Britt, Daniel Thomason, ERGOS, TomIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Technical SEO $1,625 (2 of 10 disclose) · SEO for Lead Generation $750 (6 of 18 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 116 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 4 cases with a named client and a result, 11 work claims26/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 11 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 11 confirmed, 0 partly, of 11 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 5 of 520/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 11 of 1115/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names technical SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 11 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 11 of 11 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (2 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 11 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.