Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 9 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #12 Mobile Backend and API Integration in Chicago, of 15 · also in 1 more ranking
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
Published on the agency's own site. Each quote carries a badge saying where it comes from.
Clients overwhelmingly praise Eight Bit Studios for high-quality design and software development, delivering complex projects on time with no bugs, and being easy, pleasant partners to work with. Reviewers frequently mention deep technical expertise, innovation, and long-term repeat relationships. The only negative review is an isolated complaint about a misleading survey gift card offer unrelated to project work, and it dates back to 2018.More
- Pleasant, easy partnership13
- Design and development expertise6
- On-time, on-budget delivery and reliability5
- Understanding client needs and acting as trusted advisors5
- Technical quality and bug-free delivery4
“Easy to work with, great results.”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“Deep expertise in design and software development that seems all too rare in the age of vibe coding.”
“They delivered with flying colors, on time, on budget and no bugs.”
“They really take the time to understand the business need and always deliver stellar work.”
“delivered a complex product with absolutely zero technical bugs across tens of thousands of downloads”
No criticism in the quotes read.
Show 2 more resultsHide results
- Web and mobile app development3
- Software/product development3
- Website development2
- Product, design and engineering partnership1
- General business/brand owner
- Startup
- Long-term business client
Show 1 named client quoteHide named client quotes
“The team was extremely responsive and able to get the resources assigned and up and running on a tight timeline. Taylor Bloom, CTO & Co-founder @ Foxtrot”
- Your business matches the client types on file (founders) and the industries on file (ecommerce, saas, fintech).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Web and mobile app development (3 of 9 mentions); Software/product development (3).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 9 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #11 TekInvent47Ranks above on this question#11#12 this oneScore4738Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #13 Synergy Labs38Ranks below on this question#13#12 this oneScore3838Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Eight Bit Studios.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#12 Mobile Backend and API Integration in Chicago: 38/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 8 | 27% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.5 | 62% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 9.4 | 63% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 7.2 | 72% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 3 | 60% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed9 of 9 on file · 0 of 9 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 9 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 9. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 5 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Mobile Backend and API Integration 1. The full ledger of 9 is on the proof page.
Eight Bit Studios provides fractional CTO leadership and development for MyCheckUpHealth, a healthcare marketplace connecting patients with transparent pricing.
Agency's own wordseightbitstudios.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
A healthcare marketplace connecting patients with transparent pricing, designed for the working middle class that insurance leaves behind. Eight Bit provides fractional CTO leadership and development.
Eight Bit Studios lists Nielsen as a client for which it built API showcase applications.
Agency's own wordseightbitstudios.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workMobile Backend and API IntegrationQuote from the source page
Nielsen, API showcase applications
Eight Bit built the Health.Vet platform, a free resource helping veterans reach care and helping health systems receive veterans who are already eligible and funded, using Rails 8 and VA data integrations.
Agency's own wordseightbitstudios.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
They built Health.Vet: a free resource helping veterans reach care and helping health systems receive veterans who are already eligible and funded. Eight Bit built the platform on Rails 8 with VA data integrations.
The page lists Vivid Seats, Allstate, Field Museum, and GrowIt! (1M+ users) as notable clients of Eight Bit Studios, without describing the service performed or results for any of them.
Agency's own wordseightbitstudios.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Notable clients: Vivid Seats, Allstate, Field Museum, GrowIt! (1M+ users)
Taylor Bloom, CTO and Co-founder at Foxtrot, said the team was extremely responsive and got resources assigned and running on a tight timeline.
Agency's own wordseightbitstudios.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
The team was extremely responsive and able to get the resources assigned and up and running on a tight timeline. Taylor Bloom, CTO & Co-founder @ Foxtrot
Eight Bit Studios lists Vivid Seats as a Chicago-area client for whom it did mobile app design and development.
Agency's own wordseightbitstudios.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Vivid Seats, Mobile app design and development
Eight Bit Studios lists GrowIt! as a Chicago-area client for which it built a social gardening platform.
Agency's own wordseightbitstudios.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
GrowIt!, Social gardening platform
Eight Bit Studios lists the Field Museum as a Chicago-area client for which it built interactive museum experiences.
Agency's own wordseightbitstudios.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Field Museum, Interactive museum experiences
Eight Bit Studios lists Allstate as a client for which it did mobile UI/UX design.
Agency's own wordseightbitstudios.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Allstate, Mobile UI/UX design
Positions in every ranking2 rankings
2 positions: 2 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 2 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile Backend and API Integration · Chicagoon its own published cases | #12 of 15 | 38 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Mobile Backend and API Integration · Phoenixon its own published cases | #61 of 65 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Chicago, IL, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Chicago, IL, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- founderVendar profile field
- Industries
- Ecommerce, SaaS, Fintech, Healthcare, B2BVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- MyCheckUpHealth, Nielsen, Health.Vet, Allstate, CTO & Co-founder @ Foxtrot, Vivid Seats, GrowIt!, Field MuseumIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- retainer
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Mobile Backend and API Integration $5,500 (2 of 15 disclose) · Mobile Backend and API Integration $5,000 (8 of 65 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: 24 third-party reviews at 4.3. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2009Agency's own words
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- Mobile DevelopmentVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: team size16/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee4/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 9 work claims9/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 9 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 9 confirmed, 0 partly, of 9 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 9 of 915/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 9 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 9 of 9 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 9 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.