Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #15 Local SEO in Chicago, of 23 · also in 9 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google5.0/511 reviews as of Nov 3, 2026- 10% written in the last 12 months
- 0% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 100% of Google reviews answered
Clients most often value Kyle’s SEO knowledge, clear and helpful communication, and reported improvements in rankings, traffic, and customers. The supplied reviews are consistently positive, with no criticism stated, though some reviews are brief or truncated.More
- SEO expertise and ability to improve rankings6
- Clear, professional communication and keeping clients informed4
- Responsive and efficient help4
- Professionalism3
- Listening and a consultative approach1
“A legit SEO expert at ranking businesses on Google Search and Google Maps.”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“You always know the status of your SEO success with Kyle”
“He was so quick and efficient”
“He was quick to act and kept his word while delivering a great website.”
“He took the time to really listen to my needs”
No criticism in the 10 reviews read.
Show 2 more resultsHide results
- SEO2
- Business profile management1
- Website development1
- Website bug fixing1
- Laser engraving business
- Small business
- Artist
- Pharmaceutical companies and healthcare startups
- Your business matches the client types on file (law firms, healthcares) and the industries on file (healthcare, legal).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: SEO (2 of 5 mentions); Business profile management (1).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for a Local SEO case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #14 Proceed Innovative51Ranks above on this question#14#15 this oneScore5150Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #16 Chicago SEO Consultant47Ranks below on this question#16#15 this oneScore4750Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Kyle Eggleston SEO Consultant.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#15 Local SEO in Chicago: 50/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 13 | 43% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.5 | 62% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 13.8 | 92% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 7.2 | 72% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 2.7 | 54% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed4 of 5 on file · 0 of 4 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 5 claims on file: independent source 1 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 4. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 4 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: AI search visibility 2 · Local SEO 2. The full ledger of 5 is on the proof page.
A name-withheld site built and written entirely with AI tools earned 1,978 clicks and 127,262 impressions from April 27 to September 13, 2026, with Domain Rating 0 and zero dofollow backlinks; the page states these are organic Google Search results, not evidence of AI Overview citations.
Agency's own wordskyleeggleston.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workApril 27 to September 13, 2026AI search visibilityQuote from the source page
A real, name-withheld site built and written 100% with AI tools earned 1,978 clicks and 127,262 impressions from April 27 to September 13, 2026, with Domain Rating 0 and zero dofollow backlinks.
For an industrial client's Chicago branch, a Local Falcon 9 by 9 grid scan on September 14, 2026 for "air compressor repair" measured a 100% share of local voice in Google Maps, 71.6% AI visibility in Google AI Mode, 44.4% in ChatGPT and 33.3% in Gemini.
Agency's own wordskyleeggleston.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workSeptember 14, 2026Local SEOAI search visibilityQuote from the source page
For one industrial client's Chicago branch, I scanned "air compressor repair" on four engines on September 14, 2026 (Local Falcon, 9 by 9 grid): the branch held a 100% share of local voice in Google Maps, a 71.6% share of AI visibility in Google AI Mode, 44.4% in ChatGPT and 33.3% in Gemini.
After an industrial client's 2026 site relaunch, weekly Google impressions went from about 12,700 in July to about 31,800 in August, 2.5 times as many in the first month, and its five branches held Google Maps top 3 positions at 394 of 405 grid points for "air compressor repair".
Agency's own wordskyleeggleston.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes work2026Local SEOQuote from the source page
The same client's website was rebuilt in 2026. Weekly Google impressions went from about 12,700 in July to about 31,800 in August, 2.5 times as many in the first month after relaunch, and its five branches held Google Maps top 3 positions at 394 of 405 grid points for that keyword.
An anonymized site built and written 100% with AI tools earned 1,978 clicks and 127,262 impressions from April 27 to September 13, 2026, with Domain Rating 0 and zero dofollow backlinks. The page describes this as one site's result.
Agency's own wordskyleeggleston.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workApril 27 to September 13, 2026Quote from the source page
A real, name-withheld site built and written 100% with AI tools earned 1,978 clicks and 127,262 impressions from April 27 to September 13, 2026, with Domain Rating 0 and zero dofollow backlinks. It grew through the May 2026 core update and the June and August 2026 spam updates with zero ranking setbacks. This is one site's result, not a promise that AI-written pages will rank.
Positions in every ranking10 rankings
10 positions: 10 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local SEO · Chicagoon its own published cases | #15 of 23 | 50 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Chicagoon its own published cases | #20 of 51 | 48 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Dallason its own published cases | #30 of 51 | 40 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · New Yorkon its own published cases | #30 of 51 | 40 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Atlantaon its own published cases | #28 of 51 | 40 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
5 more positionsHide the other 5
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI search visibility · Houstonon its own published cases | #28 of 51 | 40 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Miamion its own published cases | #28 of 51 | 40 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Phoenixon its own published cases | #28 of 51 | 40 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Seattleon its own published cases | #28 of 51 | 40 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #29 of 51 | 40 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Chicago, IL, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Chicago, IL, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- legal, healthcareVendar profile field
- Industries
- Healthcare, LegalVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- none namedIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
The Local SEO band tops out at $6,000/month; this vendor does not publish a monthly floor.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Local SEO $1,000 (14 of 23 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose)
Reputation
- Google5 · 11 reviews
How it counts: 11 third-party reviews at 5.0. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2004Agency's own words
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: team size16/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 4 work claims4/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 1 platform with a rating and 10 or more reviews8/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 4 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 4 confirmed, 0 partly, of 5 with a source20/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 2 of 220/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 4 of 512/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names local SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Only one third-party evidence claim is normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 4 of 5 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 1 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (1 of 3)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (4 of 5)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 4 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (team size missing)
- Open: At least three named clients (0 named)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.