No published ranking admits this vendor on documented work yet; the profile shows what is on file.
Not in any evidence-ranked listing yet: no independent claim documents work for a published need.
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google4.7/513 reviews as of Nov 3, 2026- 10% written in the last 12 months
- 10% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 90% of Google reviews answered
Clients most often praise fast service, honest and professional help from Artur, and clear communication. One client criticises a website as poor quality and confusing to navigate, while others report real results after switching agencies. Reviews are mostly short and positive, with the main detailed negative coming from one website project.More
- Fast service and quick setup4
- Professionalism and expertise2
- Honesty and reliability2
- Clear communication and explaining complex issues1
- Real results compared to previous agencies1
“Very fast service at any time of day.”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“The professionalism with which Arthur approaches every task is simply unmatched.”
“Mr. Artur helps me very well and honestly in all matters related to the Internet.”
“Arthur has the ability to explain even the most complicated IT issues in a simple and understan”
“After several months of searching for the right marketing company, I finally found Artur from Media Express – and only now am I seeing real results.”
- Poor website quality and confusing navigation1
“the website he built for me was very poor quality and lacking in quality. My clients also said it was difficult and very confusing to navigate.”
- Internet services and setup4
- Marketing services and website creation1
- IT services1
- Website development1
- Residential internet users
- Small business owner with an offering to present online
- Individual needing IT support
- Business owner whose clients use the website
- Your business matches the client types on file (small businesses, local service businesses, law firms) and the industries on file (education, home services, small business).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Internet services and setup (4 of 7 mentions); Marketing services and website creation (1).
- Read the criticism first: "Poor website quality and confusing navigation" (1 of 10 reviews read).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
Price not disclosed. Ask for a quote and the minimum term.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 3 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
Not ranked yet, so there are no ranking neighbours to compare with.
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Media Express LLC.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterionNot ranked
No score yet: Media Express LLC is not admitted to any evidence-ranked listing. The score appears with the first independent claim that documents work for a published need.
All claims in the feed4 of 4 on file · 0 of 3 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 4 claims on file: independent source 1 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 3. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 2 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: none tagged to a ranked need. The full ledger of 4 is on the proof page.
Media Express LLC performed website and technical infrastructure work for Wiadomosci.com, a Polish-language news portal.
Agency's own wordsmediaexpress.usclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
A Polish-language news portal with website and technical infrastructure work by Media Express.
Media Express LLC did website design, infrastructure and technical operations for Polski.fm, a Polish-American radio brand.
Agency's own wordsmediaexpress.usclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Website design, infrastructure and technical operations for a Polish-American radio brand.
Media Express LLC provided website and technical support for MojBilet.com, an event ticketing platform serving the Polish-American community.
Agency's own wordsmediaexpress.usclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Website and technical support for an event ticketing platform serving the Polish-American community.
Chicago Local Biz, a brand of Media Express LLC, offers human-verified local SEO and business verification for Chicago-area businesses in English and Polish, and states it has been in business since 1995.
Independent sourcechicagolocal.bizverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026Quote from the source page
Human-verified local SEO and business verification for Chicago-area businesses, in English and Polish. A brand of Media Express LLC, in business since 1995.
Positions in every ranking0 rankings
Not admitted to any ranking yet.
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Mount Prospect, IL, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Chicago, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- small_business, local_service_business, legal, healthcare_providerVendar profile field
- Industries
- Education, Home Services, Small Business, Dental, Medical, Restaurants, LawVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Wiadomosci.com, Polski.fm, MojBilet.comIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- project
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- 1 month (month to month)
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: reputation is weighted 5 of 100 and discounted when few reviews are on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 1995Agency's own words
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- English, PolishVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- n/a
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: team size16/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: entry price, hourly rate, setup fee7/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 3 work claims3/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 3 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 4 confirmed, 0 partly, of 4 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 4 of 415/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 3 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Only one third-party evidence claim is normalized.
- 3 of 4 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 1 come from an independent source.
- Open: Decision layer complete: score, verdict, reason, best position (not ranked)
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 3 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (team size missing)
- Open: JSON-LD carries Vendar's rating as a Review and an absolute logo (built from the same view; checked on the live page by QA)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (2 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.