Ranks in the top three for at least one question. Most of its claims match the sources they cite. None of its 3 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #3 Local SEO in Atlanta, of 15 · also in 3 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file (small businesses) and the industries on file (home services, small business, restaurants).
- You need proof of Local SEO work in Atlanta: documented cases are in Phoenix (for example Melanie Chandler), not Atlanta.
- You need the setup fee in writing before you commit: it is not published.
Starting price is below the median of ranked agencies for this question.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 3 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Few outside reviews mention Local SEO work specifically.
- Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #2 Persist Marketing62Ranks above on this question#2#3 this oneScore6252Independent00PriceFrom $2,000/monthFrom $450 per month, retainerModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #4 KiLLit OnLine49Ranks below on this question#4#3 this oneScore4952Independent00Pricenot disclosedFrom $450 per month, retainerModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Orbit Digital Studio.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#3 Local SEO in Atlanta: 52/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 12 | 40% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 21.9 | 88% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 15 | 100% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparency | 10 | 5 | 50% |
|
| Reputationweakest | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed3 of 3 on file · 0 of 3 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 3 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 3. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 1 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Small Business 1 · Local SEO 2 · SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget 1 · SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer 1. The full ledger of 3 is on the proof page.
Amber Byrd says Orbit helped her and her co-owner get their website up and running and under management, and worked with them on their budget as small business owners.
Agency's own wordsorbitdigitalstudio.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes work18 July 2025Small BusinessQuote from the source page
Myself and my co-owner are new business owners. We were referred to Josh with Orbit studio to help us get our website up and going and under management. This was the BEST decision we could’ve made. We aren’t super tech savvy, but Josh held our hands the entire way, has been so informative and explained everything in laymen’s terms so we can better understand. He’s reliable and trustworthy and he worked with us on our budget as small business owners. He exceeded our expectations and we will always recommend him for this type of work. 100000000/10.
Matt Nation says Orbit did work on his WordPress site and Google Business Profile.
Agency's own wordsorbitdigitalstudio.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes work8 September 2026Local SEOQuote from the source page
Orbit did a amazing job with our Wordpress and Google Business profile work!
Melanie Chandler says Orbit helped with her local SEO and Google Business Profile management.
Agency's own wordsorbitdigitalstudio.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes work8 September 2026Local SEOSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerQuote from the source page
Orbit digital studio really helped with my local SEO and Google business profile management!”
Positions in every ranking4 rankings
4 positions: 4 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 4 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #3 of 15 | 52 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget · Atlantaon its own published cases | #3 of 6 | 52 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer · Atlantaon its own published cases | #3 of 8 | 52 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| Small Business · Atlantaon its own published cases | #2 of 2 | 45 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Suwanee, GA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Atlanta, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- small_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- Home Services, Small Business, RestaurantsVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Amber Byrd, Matt Nation, Melanie ChandlerIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullFrom $450 per month, retainer
- Model
- retainer
- Minimum monthly budget
- $450 per month
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- 1 month (month to month)
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Agency's own words. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Inside the Local SEO band (up to $6,000/month).
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Local SEO $799 (4 of 15 disclose) · SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget $799 (6 of 6 disclose) · SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer $799 (6 of 8 disclose) · Small Business $1,225 (2 of 2 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: hourly rate, setup fee13/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 1 cases with a named client and a result, 3 work claims7/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 3 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 3 confirmed, 0 partly, of 3 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 3 of 315/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names local SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 3 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Only one external source URL is exposed.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 3 of 3 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (1 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 3 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (1 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.