PEER365
Data as of · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
How Vendar worksAdmitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #4 SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer in Houston, of 5 · also in 2 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
Published on the agency's own site. Each quote carries a badge saying where it comes from.
Clients most often value responsive support, helpful communication, and practical website or advertising work. No criticism appears in these reviews; all five are agency-published testimonials, so the positive feedback is consistent but comes from a limited source type.More
- Responsive and accessible communication3
- Website development and design3
- Ongoing support and maintenance2
- Clear explanation of SEO timelines1
“responsive support”
Show 3 more quotesHide quotes
“an interactive website with before-and-after project images”
“ongoing maintenance”
“straightforward explanation of SEO timelines”
No criticism in the quotes read.
- Google Ads2
- Website development2
- Website management1
- SEO1
- Website maintenance1
- Website redesign1
- Home-remodeling business
- E-commerce business
- Retail business
Show 5 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“The customer described responsive support and a long-running relationship involving website management, SEO and Google Ads. Brad Hall Long-term customer”
“A customer reported that changes to Google Ads reduced wasted spend by about 35% and generated roughly twice as many leads on the same budget.”
“A home-remodeling business praised an interactive website with before-and-after project images, plus accessible communication throughout development.”
“An e-commerce client praised the team's WordPress development, ongoing maintenance, responsiveness and willingness to help when technical issues arose.”
“A retail business owner appreciated the team's straightforward explanation of SEO timelines and the redesign of a website serving its barbecue grill and accessories business.”
- Your business matches the client types on file (local businesses) and the industries on file (local business).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Google Ads (2 of 8 mentions); Website development (2).
- You need the setup fee in writing before you commit: it is not published.
Starting price is below the median of ranked agencies for this question.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Few outside reviews mention SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer work specifically.
- Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for a SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #3 Bear SEO54Ranks above on this question#3#4 this oneScore5444Independent00PriceFrom $1,250/monthFrom $1,000 per month, retainerModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #5 All Day Web Design & Hosting29Ranks below on this question#5#4 this oneScore2944Independent00Pricenot disclosedFrom $1,000 per month, retainerModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for PEER365.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#4 SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer in Houston: 44/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 8 | 27% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 18.4 | 74% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 10.6 | 71% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 7.2 | 72% |
|
| Transparency | 10 | 5 | 50% |
|
| Reputationweakest | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed5 of 5 on file · 0 of 5 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 5 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 5. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 2 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: SEO for Lead Generation 1 · SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget 1 · SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer 1. The full ledger of 5 is on the proof page.
A Google Ads client, John Kottenstette, reported that changes to the ad campaigns reduced wasted spend by about 35% and generated roughly twice as many leads on the same budget. This is a paid advertising result, not an SEO result.
Agency's own wordsseowebdesignhouston.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
A customer reported that changes to Google Ads reduced wasted spend by about 35% and generated roughly twice as many leads on the same budget.
A retail business owner, Mike Arnett, appreciated the team's explanation of SEO timelines and the redesign of the website for his barbecue grill and accessories business.
Agency's own wordsseowebdesignhouston.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerQuote from the source page
A retail business owner appreciated the team's straightforward explanation of SEO timelines and the redesign of a website serving its barbecue grill and accessories business.
A long-term customer named Brad Hall left a five-star review describing responsive support and a long-running relationship involving website management, SEO and Google Ads.
Agency's own wordsseowebdesignhouston.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
The customer described responsive support and a long-running relationship involving website management, SEO and Google Ads. Brad Hall Long-term customer
A home-remodeling client, Chris D, praised an interactive website with before-and-after project images and accessible communication during development.
Agency's own wordsseowebdesignhouston.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
A home-remodeling business praised an interactive website with before-and-after project images, plus accessible communication throughout development.
An e-commerce client, Carrie Ranney, praised the vendor's WordPress development, ongoing maintenance, responsiveness and help with technical issues.
Agency's own wordsseowebdesignhouston.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
An e-commerce client praised the team's WordPress development, ongoing maintenance, responsiveness and willingness to help when technical issues arose.
Positions in every ranking3 rankings
3 positions: 3 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 3 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer · Houstonon its own published cases | #4 of 5 | 44 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget · Houstonon its own published cases | #18 of 18 | 44 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO for Lead Generation · Houstonon its own published cases | #21 of 29 | 44 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Shenandoah, TX, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Houston, TX, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- local_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- Local BusinessVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- John Kottenstette, Mike Arnett, Brad Hall, Carrie RanneyIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullFrom $1,000 per month, retainer
- Model
- retainer
- Minimum monthly budget
- $1,000 per month
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- 1 month (month to month)
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Agency's own words. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer $1,250 (4 of 5 disclose) · SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget $1,000 (18 of 18 disclose) · SEO for Lead Generation $1,000 (16 of 29 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2001Agency's own words
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: team size16/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: hourly rate, setup fee13/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 1 cases with a named client and a result, 5 work claims9/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 5 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 5 confirmed, 0 partly, of 5 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 1 of 120/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 5 of 515/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names SEO for lead generation work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 5 of 5 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 5 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (team size missing)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (2 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 1, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.