No published ranking admits this vendor on documented work yet; the profile shows what is on file.
Not in any evidence-ranked listing yet: no independent claim documents work for a published need.
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
Published on the agency's own site. Each quote carries a badge saying where it comes from.
The three available testimonials are positive, mentioning transformed marketing and outreach and a brand and company reaching the next level. None criticises the agency, but the testimonials provide little detail, so consistency is difficult to assess.More
- Marketing and local outreach1
- Brand and company growth1
“This firm transformed our marketing and local outreach.”
Show 1 more quoteHide quotes
“They have taken our brand and subsequently our company to the next level.”
No criticism in the quotes read.
- Conference collateral1
- Marketing and local outreach1
- Association
- Law center
- Organic products company
Show 3 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“CLIENT NASCLA - National Association of State Contractors Licensing Agencies PROJECT 59th Annual - Conference Collateral”
“This firm transformed our marketing and local outreach.”
“They have taken our brand and subsequently our company to the next level.”
- Your business looks like the reviewers': association; law center; organic products company.
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Conference collateral (1 of 2 mentions); Marketing and local outreach (1).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
Price not disclosed. Ask for a quote and the minimum term.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 8 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
Not ranked yet, so there are no ranking neighbours to compare with.
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for ReThinc Advertising & PR.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterionNot ranked
No score yet: ReThinc Advertising & PR is not admitted to any evidence-ranked listing. The score appears with the first independent claim that documents work for a published need.
All claims in the feed8 of 8 on file · 0 of 8 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 8 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 8. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 7 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: none tagged to a ranked need. The full ledger of 8 is on the proof page.
ReThinc Advertising & PR's design team created an invitation for the 2025 Excellence in Landscaping Awards Gala for client ALCA (Arizona Landscape Contractors' Association), and the invitation won a Gold ADDY Award.
Agency's own wordsrethincadvertising.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes work2025Quote from the source page
Our design team created a dynamic invitation for the 2025 Gala and are proud to say it won a Gold ADDY Award.
ReThinc Advertising & PR developed a logo rebrand for the Arizona Landscape Contractors' Association (ALCA), an association representing over 420 professional landscape and affiliated companies. The page shows before and after images but states no measurable result.
Agency's own wordsrethincadvertising.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
The Arizona Landscape Contractors' Association (ALCA) represents over 420 professional landscape and affiliated companies.
ReThinc created creative promotional artwork for the Tempe Center for the Arts for their play Detroit ’67. The artwork was inspired by a Motown album design and reflects the story of the play.
Agency's own wordsrethincadvertising.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Tempe Center of the Arts embraces their mission to provide socially impactful programming that speaks to the consciousness of their many patrons. Detroit ’67 is a play that chronicles the actions of a handful of the residents during the explosive riots that rocked the city. Using a Motown album design as inspiration, ReThinc’s artwork reflects the riveting story of a broken era of our country’s history.
ReThinc Advertising & PR's portfolio lists a conference collateral design project for the client NASCLA - National Association of State Contractors Licensing Agencies for its 59th annual conference.
Agency's own wordsrethincadvertising.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
CLIENT NASCLA - National Association of State Contractors Licensing Agencies PROJECT 59th Annual - Conference Collateral
ReThinc Advertising & PR developed a new website for the Arizona Landscape Contractors' Association (ALCA). The page describes the work as website design and development but states no measurable result.
Agency's own wordsrethincadvertising.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
As an established brand, our creative team worked hard to develop a new website that represented their offerings and position in the industry.
A testimonial from Washington Law center states that ReThinc transformed its marketing and local outreach.
Agency's own wordsrethincadvertising.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
This firm transformed our marketing and local outreach.
A testimonial from HIBUDDY ORGANICS states that ReThinc took its brand and company to the next level.
Agency's own wordsrethincadvertising.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
They have taken our brand and subsequently our company to the next level.
The portfolio entry lists website design and development for MichaelPhelpsFoundation.org.
Agency's own wordsrethincadvertising.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Website Design and Development MichaelPhelpsFoundation.org
Positions in every ranking0 rankings
Not admitted to any ranking yet.
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Phoenix, AZ, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Phoenix, AZ, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- not statedVendar profile field
- Industries
- not statedVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- ALCA (Arizona Landscape Contractors' Association), Arizona Landscape Contractors' Association (ALCA), Tempe Center for the Arts, NASCLA - National Association of State Contractors Licensing Agencies, Washington Law center, HIBUDDY ORGANICSIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: reputation is weighted 5 of 100 and discounted when few reviews are on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2008Agency's own words
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- n/a
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: team size16/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types: industries, client types5/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 1 cases with a named client and a result, 8 work claims12/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 8 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 8 confirmed, 0 partly, of 8 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 8 of 815/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 8 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- 8 of 8 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Decision layer complete: score, verdict, reason, best position (not ranked)
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (1 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 8 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (team size missing)
- Open: JSON-LD carries Vendar's rating as a Review and an absolute logo (built from the same view; checked on the live page by QA)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.