Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 10 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #10 Ecommerce SEO in Phoenix, of 10 · also in 17 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google5.0/510 reviews as of Nov 2, 2026- 90% written in the last 12 months
- 0% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 0% of Google reviews answered
70% of the reviews read arrived within 30 days from 2026-02-11. A burst like this can be a review drive; read them with that in mind.
Clients consistently praise Rook Digital for knowledgeable, clear presentations and practical, tailored SEO help. No review criticises the agency. The Google reviews mostly come from seminar attendees, while the named testimonials describe longer-term SEO, conversion, and paid media engagements.More
- Informative and knowledgeable presentations9
- Helpful and practical takeaway5
- Clear and easy-to-understand communication3
- Tailored, not cookie-cutter approach1
- Strategic transformation1
“extremely informative and helpful”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“They even took the time to help me out after.”
“Clear, concise, relatable.”
“It's not cookie cutter SEO. They tailor the campaign to the needs and strengths of your business.”
“Their strategic approach has completely transformed how we attract and retain members.”
No criticism in the 10 reviews read.
- SEO (consultation, training, implementation, fulfillment, l5
- Conversion rate optimization (training, consulting)4
- Paid ads / Google Ads2
- Web design and development1
- Organic search1
- Food brand
- Tourism / destination marketing organization
- Ecommerce brand
- eLearning / leadership training company
- Children's theatre
Show 6 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“Kodiak Cakes ... Services provided: SEO consultation, training, and implementation.”
“Visit Savannah ... Services provided: SEO training, conversion rate optimization training, and SEO fulfillment.”
“Lime Lush ... Services provided: Ecommerce SEO training, conversion rate optimization consulting, and implementation.”
“Rook Digital helped us refine every stage of our online presence, from organic search to paid ads and conversion optimization. Their strategic approach has completely transformed how we attract and retain members.”
“During the audit, we found WordPress’s “discourage search engines” setting enabled. A basic configuration issue was undermining the site’s ability to appear in Google. After the setting was corrected in March 2026, the site began ranking in Google within a week.”
“Blue Ox Services provided: Local SEO, conversion rate optimization, web design and development, and Google Ads.”
- Your business matches the client types on file: enterprises, small businesses, local businesses.
- You need what reviewers hired it for: SEO (consultation, training, implementation, fulfillment, l (5 of 13 mentions); Conversion rate optimization (training, consulting) (4).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 10 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for an Ecommerce SEO case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #8 PrimeView41Ranks above on this question#8#10 this oneScore4131Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #9 Widely Interactive36Ranks above on this question#9#10 this oneScore3631Independent00PriceFrom $1,500/monthnot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Rook Digital.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#10 Ecommerce SEO in Phoenix: 31/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 8 | 27% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.5 | 62% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 9.2 | 61% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed10 of 10 on file · 0 of 10 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 10 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 10. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 3 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: SEO Consulting 3 · Ecommerce SEO 1 · Local SEO 1. The full ledger of 10 is on the proof page.
Rook Digital's SEO strategy for Echelon Front grew monthly organic sessions from 182 in March 2022 to 5,787 in March 2023, and first-page rankings from 6 in January 2023 to 107 in January 2024.
Agency's own wordsrookdigital.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workMarch 2022 to January 2024Quote from the source page
Monthly organic sessions increased from 182 in March 2022 to 5,787 in March 2023. First-page rankings then grew from 6 in January 2023 to 107 in January 2024.
Rook Digital's SEO work for Echelon Front produced 3,080% organic session growth from March 2022 to March 2023, measured in Universal Analytics.
Agency's own wordsrookdigital.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workMarch 2022 to March 2023Quote from the source page
3,080% Organic session growth March 2022, March 2023 Source: Universal Analytics
For Genesis Children’s Theatre, an audit found WordPress’s “discourage search engines” setting enabled; after it was corrected in March 2026, the site began ranking in Google within a week.
Agency's own wordsrookdigital.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workMarch 2026Quote from the source page
During the audit, we found WordPress’s “discourage search engines” setting enabled. A basic configuration issue was undermining the site’s ability to appear in Google. After the setting was corrected in March 2026, the site began ranking in Google within a week.
Rook Digital provided SEO consultation, training, and implementation for Kodiak Cakes, according to the case study listing.
Agency's own wordsrookdigital.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Kodiak Cakes ... Services provided: SEO consultation, training, and implementation.
Rook Digital provided SEO training, conversion rate optimization training, and SEO fulfillment for Visit Savannah.
Agency's own wordsrookdigital.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workSEO ConsultingQuote from the source page
Visit Savannah ... Services provided: SEO training, conversion rate optimization training, and SEO fulfillment.
Rook Digital provided ecommerce SEO training, conversion rate optimization consulting, and implementation for Lime Lush.
Agency's own wordsrookdigital.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workEcommerce SEOSEO ConsultingQuote from the source page
Lime Lush ... Services provided: Ecommerce SEO training, conversion rate optimization consulting, and implementation.
Corey Mize, Director of eLearning at Echelon Front, credited Rook Digital with refining the online presence from organic search to paid ads and conversion optimization.
Agency's own wordsrookdigital.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Rook Digital helped us refine every stage of our online presence, from organic search to paid ads and conversion optimization. Their strategic approach has completely transformed how we attract and retain members.
Rook Digital's consulting engagement with Echelon Front began in February 2022, covering internal marketing operations and overall digital strategy.
Agency's own wordsrookdigital.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workFebruary 2022SEO ConsultingQuote from the source page
February 2022 / Consulting engagement begins Consulting on internal marketing operations and overall digital strategy.
Rook Digital lists a case study for Blue Ox with services provided including local SEO, conversion rate optimization, web design and development, and Google Ads.
Agency's own wordsrookdigital.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workLocal SEOQuote from the source page
Blue Ox Services provided: Local SEO, conversion rate optimization, web design and development, and Google Ads.
Rook Digital built and managed Meta and Google Ads campaigns for Echelon Front to drive free memberships and sales, alongside SEO and sales funnel work, so the traffic and revenue results are not attributable to one service.
Agency's own wordsrookdigital.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Rook built and managed Meta and Google Ads campaigns to drive free memberships and sales.
Positions in every ranking18 rankings
18 positions: 18 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO Consulting · Phoenixon its own published cases | #5 of 15 | 43 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Atlantaon its own published cases | #10 of 15 | 34 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Chicagoon its own published cases | #10 of 15 | 34 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Dallason its own published cases | #10 of 15 | 34 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #10 of 15 | 34 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
13 more positionsHide the other 13
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO Consulting · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #10 of 15 | 34 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Houstonon its own published cases | #11 of 15 | 34 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Miamion its own published cases | #11 of 15 | 34 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · New Yorkon its own published cases | #11 of 15 | 34 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Seattleon its own published cases | #11 of 15 | 34 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Phoenixon its own published cases | #10 of 10 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Local SEO · Phoenixon its own published cases | #26 of 26 | 34 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #110 of 112 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Chicagoon its own published cases | #110 of 112 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #110 of 112 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #111 of 112 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #110 of 112 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #111 of 112 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Phoenix, AZ, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Phoenix, AZ, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- enterprise, small_business, local_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- not statedVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Echelon Front, Genesis Children’s Theatre, Kodiak Cakes, Visit Savannah, Lime Lush, Blue OxIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Ecommerce SEO $1,500 (5 of 10 disclose) · Local SEO $1,495 (12 of 26 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size12/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types: industries10/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 3 cases with a named client and a result, 10 work claims22/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 10 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 10 confirmed, 0 partly, of 10 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 2 of 220/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 10 of 1015/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names ecommerce SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 10 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 10 of 10 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 10 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.