Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #11 SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer in Phoenix, of 11 · also in 1 more ranking
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
Published on the agency's own site. Each quote carries a badge saying where it comes from.
The reviews are positive, praising professionalism, knowledge, and help with website and content work. One client reports an immediate increase in phone calls after a website launch; no reviews mention criticism. The set is small and consists entirely of testimonials published by the agency.More
- Professionalism and knowledge1
- Learning about the client's products1
- Working within budget1
- Positive website project experience1
“They are very professional and knowledgeable.”
Show 3 more quotesHide quotes
“SEO Phoenix took the time to learn about our medical device products”
“They worked within our budget”
“It was such a pleasure to work with Shawn and his team to create a new website for our business!”
No criticism in the quotes read.
- New website creation1
- Help increasing website traffic1
- Website content development1
- Logo design1
- Medical device business
Show 5 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“It was such a pleasure to work with Shawn and his team to create a new website for our business! From the minute our new website was launched our phones started ringing off the hook.”
“They are very professional and knowledgeable. They worked within our budget in a very competitive industry.”
“Being fairly new to this market we needed a company that would help us increase traffic to our website.”
“SEO Phoenix took the time to learn about our medical device products in order to help us develop great content for our site.”
“I highly recommend Shawn & SEO Phoenix for any type of logo design.”
- Your business looks like the reviewers': medical device business.
- You need what reviewers hired it for: New website creation (1 of 4 mentions); Help increasing website traffic (1).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #9 Widely Interactive42Ranks above on this question#9#11 this oneScore4230Independent00PriceFrom $1,500/monthnot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #10 Internet Marketing Phoenix33Ranks above on this question#10#11 this oneScore3330Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for SEO Phoenix.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#11 SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer in Phoenix: 30/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 6 | 20% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.5 | 62% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 10.6 | 71% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed5 of 5 on file · 0 of 5 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 5 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 5. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 1 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer 5 · SEO for High-Ticket Services 1. The full ledger of 5 is on the proof page.
A client named Debbie Yuhas says SEO Phoenix built a new website for her business and that after launch the phones started ringing.
Agency's own wordsseophoenix.netclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerQuote from the source page
It was such a pleasure to work with Shawn and his team to create a new website for our business! From the minute our new website was launched our phones started ringing off the hook.
A client named Lance H states SEO Phoenix worked within his budget in a very competitive industry and he recommends them highly.
Agency's own wordsseophoenix.netclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerQuote from the source page
They are very professional and knowledgeable. They worked within our budget in a very competitive industry.
A client named Art Lopez says he hired SEO Phoenix after Shawn met with him in person, and that the company has been helping increase traffic to his website with results he is happy with.
Agency's own wordsseophoenix.netclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerQuote from the source page
Being fairly new to this market we needed a company that would help us increase traffic to our website.
A client named Gerry Harder says SEO Phoenix learned about his medical device products to help develop content for his site.
Agency's own wordsseophoenix.netclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workSEO for High-Ticket ServicesSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerQuote from the source page
SEO Phoenix took the time to learn about our medical device products in order to help us develop great content for our site.
A client named Michelle West says Shawn of SEO Phoenix created a logo design for her that matched her vision.
Agency's own wordsseophoenix.netclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerQuote from the source page
I highly recommend Shawn & SEO Phoenix for any type of logo design.
Positions in every ranking2 rankings
2 positions: 2 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 2 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer · Phoenixon its own published cases | #11 of 11 | 30 | 5 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for High-Ticket Services · Phoenixon its own published cases | #28 of 28 | 30 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Phoenix, AZ, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Phoenix, AZ, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- not statedVendar profile field
- Industries
- not statedVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Debbie Yuhas, Art Lopez, Gerry Harder, Michelle WestIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- retainer
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer $1,495 (9 of 11 disclose) · SEO for High-Ticket Services $1,495 (17 of 28 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size12/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types: industries, client types5/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee4/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 5 work claims5/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 5 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 5 confirmed, 0 partly, of 5 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 5 of 515/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names SEO for high-ticket services work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Only one external source URL is exposed.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 5 of 5 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 5 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (1 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 1, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.