No published ranking admits this vendor on documented work yet; the profile shows what is on file.
Not in any evidence-ranked listing yet: no independent claim documents work for a published need.
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google4.9/534 reviews as of Nov 3, 2026Trustpilot3.5/513 reviews- 6% written in the last 12 months
- 9% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 0% of Google reviews answered
Clients most often value the agency’s SEO work, reported improvements in traffic or rankings, and responsive, helpful communication. Two reviewers criticize slow or disappointing work, including one who reports paying extra without seeing an SEO change; most other reviews are positive, though the reviews are not uniformly so.More
- Improved SEO visibility, traffic, rankings, or business inquiries16
- Responsive communication and support14
- Professional, knowledgeable, and attentive service12
- Fair prices or value5
- Website design, redesign, or related work clients liked3
“we have seen a significant increase in web traffic and conversions since working with them.”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“They were professional, creative and responded to every request within 24 hours.”
“Their team demonstrated expertise in SEO strategies”
“the services are affordable for small companies.”
“Mark Alexander provided me with a quality website and a presentation that I am extremely pleased with.”
- Poor website quality or incomplete work2
- Slow delivery or changes1
- Additional costs and SEO work that did not produce a change1
“The site was never 100% correct”
Show 2 more quotesHide quotes
“They were extremely slow in doing this. Changes were requested on multiple occasions and were very slow to be done.”
“Nothing. No change in my SEO. Just a ton of money down the drain”
Show 2 more resultsHide results
- SEO services or SEO campaigns20
- Website building, redesign, or optimization4
- Social media marketing or help2
- Google Business Profile setup and management1
- Small businesses and local businesses
- Healthcare or physiotherapy businesses
- General contractor
- Ecommerce store
- Startup
Show 6 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“I am beyond thrilled with the results that SEOBerg has brought to our website. Ellen, Chris, and their team have truly worked wonders with our SEO and we have seen a significant increase in web traffic and conversions since working with them.”
“Seoberg is the best experience I've had so far with seo campaigns. Mark has greatly improved my businesses seo and I started getting results not long after having begun our campaign.”
“they have been doing SEO for my web for past 1.5 years results are good.”
“I have had SEOberg servicing my SEO for about 9 months and They have enhanced the traffic into my business.”
“Their team demonstrated expertise in SEO strategies, resulting in a noticeable boost in our online presence.”
“Their on-page and off-page optimization strategies were a game-changer for our newly launched eCommerce store. I want to recommend SEO Berg to every startup.”
- Your business matches the client types on file (startups, enterprises, small businesses) and the industries on file (enterprise, startup, smb).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: SEO services or SEO campaigns (20 of 27 mentions); Website building, redesign, or optimization (4).
- Read the criticism first: "Poor website quality or incomplete work" (2 of 47 reviews read).
- Read the criticism first: "Slow delivery or changes" (1 of 47 reviews read).
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 6 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Ask for the hourly rate: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
Not ranked yet, so there are no ranking neighbours to compare with.
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for SEOBERG.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterionNot ranked
No score yet: SEOBERG is not admitted to any evidence-ranked listing. The score appears with the first independent claim that documents work for a published need.
All claims in the feed6 of 8 on file · 0 of 6 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 8 claims on file: independent source 2 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 6. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 4 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: none tagged to a ranked need. The full ledger of 8 is on the proof page.
Canada-based client MIPFY TRADING states that SEOBERG has been doing SEO for his website for the past 1.5 years with good results.
Agency's own wordsseoberg.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workpast 1.5 yearsQuote from the source page
they have been doing SEO for my web for past 1.5 years results are good.
Client Dr. Arman Ghods states that SEOBERG has serviced his SEO for about 9 months and has enhanced the traffic into his business.
Agency's own wordsseoberg.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workabout 9 monthsQuote from the source page
I have had SEOberg servicing my SEO for about 9 months and They have enhanced the traffic into my business.
Client Max Kutz reports that SEOBERG's SEO work produced a significant increase in web traffic and conversions on his website.
Agency's own wordsseoberg.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
I am beyond thrilled with the results that SEOBerg has brought to our website. Ellen, Chris, and their team have truly worked wonders with our SEO and we have seen a significant increase in web traffic and conversions since working with them.
Client Furkan states that SEOBERG improved his business's SEO through an SEO campaign and that he began getting results not long after the campaign started.
Agency's own wordsseoberg.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Seoberg is the best experience I've had so far with seo campaigns. Mark has greatly improved my businesses seo and I started getting results not long after having begun our campaign.
Client Art Ingleston reports that SEOBERG's SEO strategies produced a noticeable boost in his business's online presence.
Agency's own wordsseoberg.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Their team demonstrated expertise in SEO strategies, resulting in a noticeable boost in our online presence.
A client named Lois Manley states that SEOBERG's on-page and off-page optimization strategies benefited her newly launched eCommerce store.
Agency's own wordsseoberg.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Their on-page and off-page optimization strategies were a game-changer for our newly launched eCommerce store. I want to recommend SEO Berg to every startup.
Positions in every ranking0 rankings
Not admitted to any ranking yet.
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Los Angeles, CA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Los Angeles, CA, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- startup, enterprise, small_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- Enterprise, Startup, SMBVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- MIPFY TRADING, Dr. Arman Ghods, Max Kutz, Furkan, Art Ingleston, Lois ManleyIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullFrom $200 per month
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- $200 per month
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- 3 months
- Setup fee
- $300
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Agency's own words. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Reputation
- Google4.9 · 34 reviews
- Trustpilot3.5 · 13 reviews
How it counts: reputation is weighted 5 of 100 and discounted when few reviews are on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- n/a
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size12/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, hourly rate12/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 2 cases with a named client and a result, 6 work claims14/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 2 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews15/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 6 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 6 confirmed, 0 partly, of 8 with a source19/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 6 of 811/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 6 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- 6 of 8 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 2 come from an independent source.
- Open: Decision layer complete: score, verdict, reason, best position (not ranked)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (2 of 3)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (6 of 8)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 6 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: JSON-LD carries Vendar's rating as a Review and an absolute logo (built from the same view; checked on the live page by QA)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.