No published ranking admits this vendor on documented work yet; the profile shows what is on file.
Not in any evidence-ranked listing yet: no independent claim documents work for a published need.
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google4.6/5386 reviews as of Nov 3, 2026Trustpilot1.9/538 reviews- 97% written in the last 12 months
- 36% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 91% of Google reviews answered
97% of the 66 reviews read were written in the last 12 months, on a base of 424 reviews. A pattern like this can be a review drive; read them with that in mind.
Clients most often praise helpful, patient staff and clear explanations during sales, onboarding, and website setup. Some report promises not fulfilled, little or no work delivered, or difficulty communicating, cancelling, or getting a refund. The reviews are mixed: many positive interactions, alongside several serious complaints about service after signing up.More
- Helpful, patient customer service22
- Clear explanations and thorough guidance9
- Professionalism and knowledge7
- Website setup and onboarding assistance6
- Responsive follow-up2
“Jordan was an absolute joy to speak with today. Very knowledgeable, courteous and helpful in assisting me with my webpage.”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“William Kerr he knows his stuff I didn't have a lot of questions because he was very thorough and answered most of my questions before I could ask.”
“Jennifer was professional, helpful, and great to work with.”
“Jordan was very helpfull setting up my site and showing me how to access.”
“Jennifer answered all my questions and responded quickly.”
- Promises not fulfilled or little work delivered4
- Poor communication or difficulty reaching the company3
- Difficulty cancelling or obtaining a refund2
- Delay resolving a domain transfer request1
“Several months with them and nothing.”
Show 3 more quotesHide quotes
“I've made multiple phone calls and sent approximately 10 emailstrying to get this resolved.”
“I've been trying to cancel for 2 months and they say I can't cancel.”
“yet it has now been over two weeks.”
- Website or webpage setup and building5
- Marketing services1
- Locksmith
- Business serving parents and children
- Fine art restoration company
- Forestry business
Show 2 named client quotesHide named client quotes
““ Outstanding service and support...answered all of our questions with sincerity, honesty, and patience. We are grateful. ” Steven W.”
“Very helpful and provided good ideas to increase my presence for my company. I have enjoyed working with Staylsited.”
- Your business matches the client types on file (small businesses, local businesses) and the industries on file (real estate, local services).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Website or webpage setup and building (5 of 6 mentions); Marketing services (1).
- You need month-to-month terms: reviews report continued charges after a cancellation request (2 of 66 read).
- Read the criticism first: "Promises not fulfilled or little work delivered" (4 of 66 reviews read).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
Price not disclosed. Ask for a quote and the minimum term.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 2 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
Not ranked yet, so there are no ranking neighbours to compare with.
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Staylisted.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterionNot ranked
No score yet: Staylisted is not admitted to any evidence-ranked listing. The score appears with the first independent claim that documents work for a published need.
All claims in the feed2 of 4 on file · 0 of 2 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 4 claims on file: independent source 2 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 2. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 4 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: none tagged to a ranked need. The full ledger of 4 is on the proof page.
Steven W. provided feedback that the service and support were outstanding, noting that the team answered all of their questions with sincerity, honesty, and patience.
Agency's own wordsstaylisted.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
“ Outstanding service and support...answered all of our questions with sincerity, honesty, and patience. We are grateful. ” Steven W.
A client named Justin L., a landscape designer at Outdoor Designs, credited Staylisted's social media service with helpful ideas to increase his company's presence; the review states no specific numbers or timeframe.
Agency's own wordsstaylisted.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Very helpful and provided good ideas to increase my presence for my company. I have enjoyed working with Staylsited.
Positions in every ranking0 rankings
Not admitted to any ranking yet.
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Phoenix, AZ, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Phoenix, AZ, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- small_business, local_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- Real Estate, Local ServicesVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- none namedIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Reputation
- Google4.6 · 386 reviews
- Trustpilot1.9 · 38 reviews
How it counts: reputation is weighted 5 of 100 and discounted when few reviews are on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2013Agency's own words
- Team size
- 50Agency's own words
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- n/a
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served20/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 2 work claims2/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 2 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews15/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 2 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 2 confirmed, 0 partly, of 4 with a source13/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 2 of 48/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 2 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- 2 of 4 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 2 come from an independent source.
- Open: Decision layer complete: score, verdict, reason, best position (not ranked)
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (2 of 4)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 2 work claims)
- Open: At least three named clients (0 named)
- Open: JSON-LD carries Vendar's rating as a Review and an absolute logo (built from the same view; checked on the live page by QA)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.