Stellar SEO
Data as of · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
How Vendar worksNo published ranking admits this vendor on documented work yet; the profile shows what is on file.
Not in any evidence-ranked listing yet: no independent claim documents work for a published need.
Why: Capped: the evidence on file is thin, so confidence cannot be higher than lower confidence.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Buyers who only need lightweight local mentions or city-specific authority support.
- Less of a local-geo specialist than LA-native SEO agencies in the same shortlist.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- National specialist fit is stronger than hyperlocal positioning.
- Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- Can Stellar share sample reports with live placement URLs and quality metrics?
- Which industries are excluded or require custom outreach rather than pay-per-link ordering?
Not ranked yet, so there are no ranking neighbours to compare with.
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Stellar SEO.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterionNot ranked
No score yet: Stellar SEO is not admitted to any evidence-ranked listing. The score appears with the first independent claim that documents work for a published need.
All claims in the feed11 of 13 on file · 0 of 4 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 13 claims on file: independent source 2 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 11. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 3 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: none tagged to a ranked need. The full ledger of 13 is on the proof page.
Financial services case study describes a DSCR lending authority strategy and link-building approach designed to help search engines understand category authority.
Agency's own wordsstellarseo.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote uncheckeddescribes workPortfolio or case-study URL
Agency's own wordsstellarseo.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote uncheckeddescribes workPortfolio or case-study URL
Agency's own wordsstellarseo.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote uncheckeddescribes workStellar SEO is named a recipient of Inc. 5000, per stellarseo.com.
Agency's own wordsstellarseo.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 4, 2026Quote from the source page
Stellar SEO is a recognized SEO link-building company proudly ranked on the Inc. 5000 list of fastest-growing companies. Our expert team has helped hundreds of brands, agencies, and enterprises significantly grow organic traffic throug
Official site positions Stellar SEO as a link-building agency offering custom outreach, white-label link building, guest posting, blogger outreach, pay-per-link options, and AI visibility support.
Agency's own wordsstellarseo.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote uncheckedAbout page says Stellar SEO was founded in 2012 by Travis Bliffen, focuses on authority-driven link building for legal, finance, healthcare, SaaS, ecommerce, and enterprise markets, and has built more than 25,000 verified contextual links.
Portfolio or case-study URL
Agency's own wordsstellarseo.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote uncheckeddescribes workverified client reviews profile
Independent sourcesource kept on fileclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote uncheckedA review platform review profile
Independent sourcesource kept on fileclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote uncheckedOfficial case study and about page
Agency's own wordssource kept on fileclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote uncheckedOfficial claims around Inc. 5000 recognition
Agency's own wordssource kept on fileclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote unchecked
Positions in every ranking0 rankings
Not admitted to any ranking yet.
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- USAVerified by Vendar
- Service regions
- USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- b2b, saas, affiliate, ecommerceVendar profile field
- Industries
- B2B, SaaS, Ecommerce, AffiliateVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- none namedIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullFrom $3,500 per month, hourly
- Model
- hourly
- Minimum monthly budget
- $3,500 per month
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- $3,500 to $8,500 (period not stated)
- Minimum term
- 3 months
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- retainer, project
Source: Agency's own words, sources checked Apr 27, 2026. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: reputation is weighted 5 of 100 and discounted when few reviews are on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- Stellar SEO is named a recipient of Inc. 5000, per stellarseo.com.
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2012Verified by Vendar
- Team size
- 10-49Agency's own words
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- Link Building, Guest Posting, Niche Edits, Outreach, HARO, High DR, Authority Links, AI Search Visibility, Answer Engine Optimization, Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), SEO, LLM Visibility AuditVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- Backlink profile and authority baseline, Prospecting, asset planning, and placement strategy, Outreach or PR execution, Link-quality review and monthly reportingAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- Discovery and backlink baseline, Priority-page alignment, Prospecting and publisher criteria, First campaign sprintAgency's own words
- Reporting
- monthlyAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Capped: the evidence on file is thin, so confidence cannot be higher than lower confidence.
- Best position confidence
- n/a
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served20/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: hourly rate, setup fee13/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 4 work claims4/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 4 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 1 confirmed, 0 partly, of 9 with a source3/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 13 of 1315/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- National specialist fit is stronger than hyperlocal positioning.
- 11 of 13 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 2 come from an independent source.
- Open: Decision layer complete: score, verdict, reason, best position (not ranked)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 4 work claims)
- Open: At least three named clients (0 named)
- Open: JSON-LD carries Vendar's rating as a Review and an absolute logo (built from the same view; checked on the live page by QA)
- Open: Re-check date ahead and data younger than 180 days (data 1 days old)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 4, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Verified
- Sources checked
- Apr 27, 2026
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.
Public status, verification, and approved visibility
These badges explain the public relationship with Vendar. Paid visibility is disclosed here and only applies to approved surfaces; the audit score remains based on fit, proof, completeness, and risk signals.
No connected participation status is currently shown.
Trust review or verified profile status is visible to buyers.
No active package