Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 3 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #26 Local SEO in New York, of 27 · also in 10 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
Published on the agency's own site. Each quote carries a badge saying where it comes from.
Only three short testimonials are available, all published by the agency itself, so no independent review data exists. Clients praise improved visibility, credibility, site speed and security, and a Google Business Profile and Yext integration. The reviews are uniformly positive but brief and not verifiable from independent platforms.More
- Improved online visibility and credibility2
- Google Business Profile work1
- Website management, speed and security1
“my business gained credibility and visibility”
Show 2 more quotesHide quotes
“Exceptional Google Business Profile service!”
“My site's speed and security improved significantly”
No criticism in the quotes read.
- Google Business Profile service1
- Yext integration1
- Web hosting and website management1
- small business owners (unspecified industries)
Show 3 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“Thanks to their expertise, my business saw a significant increase in visibility and customer engagement. Exceptional Google Business Profile service!”
“Yext integration transformed my online presence. Thanks to their service, my business gained credibility and visibility. Highly recommend!”
“Exceptional web hosting service! My site's speed and security improved significantly. Kudos to their top-notch website management.”
- Your business matches the client types on file (small businesses) and the industries on file (home services, professional services, small business).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Google Business Profile service (1 of 3 mentions); Yext integration (1).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 3 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #25 Growthopedia34Ranks above on this question#25#26 this oneScore3434Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #27 Juggernaut Digital31Ranks below on this question#27#26 this oneScore3134Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for USA SEO Consultant.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#26 Local SEO in New York: 34/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 8 | 27% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.9 | 64% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 12.2 | 81% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed3 of 3 on file · 0 of 3 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 3 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 3. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 1 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Local SEO 1 · SEO Consulting 2. The full ledger of 3 is on the proof page.
Alan Ginsburg, identified as a mover, reported that USA SEO Consultant's Google Business Profile service led to a significant increase in visibility and customer engagement for his business.
Agency's own wordsusaseoconsultant.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workLocal SEOSEO ConsultingQuote from the source page
Thanks to their expertise, my business saw a significant increase in visibility and customer engagement. Exceptional Google Business Profile service!
Bill Mingo, identified as working in car repair, reported that his site's speed and security improved significantly through USA SEO Consultant's web hosting and website management service.
Agency's own wordsusaseoconsultant.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workSEO ConsultingQuote from the source page
Exceptional web hosting service! My site's speed and security improved significantly. Kudos to their top-notch website management.
Kate Bucher, identified as working in tree care, reported that Yext integration transformed her online presence and that the service helped her business gain credibility and visibility.
Agency's own wordsusaseoconsultant.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Yext integration transformed my online presence. Thanks to their service, my business gained credibility and visibility. Highly recommend!
Positions in every ranking11 rankings
11 positions: 11 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO Consulting · New Yorkon its own published cases | #9 of 15 | 37 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Atlantaon its own published cases | #11 of 15 | 32 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Chicagoon its own published cases | #11 of 15 | 32 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Dallason its own published cases | #11 of 15 | 32 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #11 of 15 | 32 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
6 more positionsHide the other 6
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO Consulting · Phoenixon its own published cases | #11 of 15 | 32 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #11 of 15 | 32 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Houstonon its own published cases | #12 of 15 | 32 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Miamion its own published cases | #12 of 15 | 32 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Seattleon its own published cases | #12 of 15 | 32 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Local SEO · New Yorkon its own published cases | #26 of 27 | 34 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Albany, NY, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- New York, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- small_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- Home Services, Professional Services, Small BusinessVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Alan Ginsburg, Bill Mingo, Kate BucherIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
The Local SEO band tops out at $6,000/month; this vendor does not publish a monthly floor.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Local SEO $2,500 (11 of 27 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 3 work claims3/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 3 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 3 confirmed, 0 partly, of 3 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 3 of 315/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names local SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 3 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Only one external source URL is exposed.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 3 of 3 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 3 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (1 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 1, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.