uSERP logo

uSERP

Verified · sources checked Apr 27, 2026USAagency10-49 peopleFrom $10,000/month, published by the agencyuserp.io

Data as of · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7

How Vendar works

No published ranking admits this vendor on documented work yet; the profile shows what is on file.

Not in any evidence-ranked listing yet: no independent claim documents work for a published need.

Why: Usable as shortlist context: 3 of 10 documented work claims come from independent sources; check the sources before outreach.

Don't take our word for it. Discuss uSERP with your AI assistant:

Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.

What clients say
Average5.0/51 independent review
on Google5.0/5as of Nov 3, 2026
  • 19 paid-directory reviews averaging 4.9, not counted
Collected Nov 3, 2026, quotes word for word.Googleindependent platformagency's sitethe agency's own site
Good fit when
SaaS link buildingHigh DRAuthority links
Look elsewhere if
  • Very small local businesses that only need lightweight local link support.
  • Less naturally suited to purely local-business citation or map-pack style briefs.
Watch out for
Independent proof of work3 of 10documented work claims come from an independent source; the rest are the agency's own words.
  • Commercial fit narrows if the buyer wants a very low-budget or broad generalist SEO retainer.
Ask before you sign
  1. Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
  2. Can uSERP share sample placement reports with traffic, relevance, and nofollow/sponsored status?
  3. How does the team now handle AI Overview and LLM-citation tracking alongside classic SEO links?
Next in the ranking

Not ranked yet, so there are no ranking neighbours to compare with.

All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for uSERP.Open ↓
Score by criterionNot ranked

No score yet: uSERP is not admitted to any evidence-ranked listing. The score appears with the first independent claim that documents work for a published need.

All claims in the feed16 of 18 on file · 3 of 10 work claims from an independent source

Who says it, across all 18 claims on file: independent source 10 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 8. Independent share of work claims: 30%. 4 distinct source pages.

Claims per need in this feed: none tagged to a ranked need. The full ledger of 18 is on the proof page.

  • Respona case study describes uSERP using outreach systems to build 300-350 links per month, with 8,100+ websites contacted and a 97% email delivery rate.

    Independent sourcerespona.comverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote uncheckeddescribes work
  • Respona outreach operations case

    Independent sourcerespona.comverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote uncheckeddescribes work
  • Portfolio or case-study URL

    Independent sourcelinkedin.comverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote uncheckeddescribes work
  • Official homepage lists case studies for Monday, Nav, Preply, Remote, Hightouch, Glassbox, OnBoard, and an internal communications SaaS platform with traffic, rankings, DR, backlink, and revenue-related outcomes.

    Agency's own wordsuserp.ioclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote uncheckeddescribes work
  • Monday organic traffic case

    Agency's own wordsuserp.ioclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote uncheckeddescribes work
  • Remote organic growth case

    Agency's own wordsuserp.ioclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote uncheckeddescribes work
  • LinkedIn describes uSERP as an SEO agency for high-growth and enterprise brands focused on strategic SEO and authoritative link building.

    Independent sourcelinkedin.comverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote unchecked
  • Official site positions uSERP as a link-building, digital PR, SEO, and AI/LLM visibility agency focused on high-authority backlinks, brand mentions, and measurable ROI.

    Agency's own wordsuserp.ioclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote unchecked
  • Nav revenue-linked ranking case

    Agency's own wordsuserp.ioclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote uncheckeddescribes work
  • Portfolio or case-study URL

    Agency's own wordsuserp.ioclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote uncheckeddescribes work
  • Portfolio or case-study URL

    Source unclearrespona.comunverified: status on filequote uncheckeddescribes work
  • Portfolio or case-study URL

    Source unclearbacklinkoo.comunverified: status on filequote uncheckeddescribes work
  • verified client reviews profile

    Independent sourcesource kept on fileclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote unchecked
  • Respona third-party case study

    Independent sourcesource kept on fileclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote unchecked
  • LinkedIn company profile

    Independent sourcesource kept on fileclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote unchecked
  • Backlinko third-party review

    Independent sourcesource kept on fileclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote unchecked
Positions in every ranking0 rankings

Not admitted to any ranking yet.

Fit and geography
Headquarters
USAVerified by Vendar
Service regions
USAVendar profile field
Client types
saas, b2b, mid_marketVendar profile field
Industries
SaaS, B2B, TechnologyVendar profile field
Named clients in confirmed proof
Monday, monday.com, Nav, Preply, Remote, Hightouch, Glassbox, OnBoardIndependent source or agency, see the claims list

Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.

Pricing in fullFrom $10,000 per month, retainer
Model
retainer
Minimum monthly budget
$10,000 per month
Project minimum
$15,000 per project
Hourly rate
not disclosed
Typical range
$5,000 to $11,000 per month
Minimum term
3 months
Setup fee
not disclosed
Engagement models
retainer, project

Source: Agency's own words, sources checked Apr 27, 2026. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.

Reputation

No review platforms on file.

How it counts: reputation is weighted 5 of 100 and discounted when few reviews are on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.

Awards
none on file
Certifications
none on file
Company and process
Founded
not disclosedNot disclosed
Team size
10-49Agency's own words
Languages
not statedVendar profile field
Services
Link Building, Digital PR, SaaS, Authority Links, High DR, Traffic-based, HARO, AI Search Visibility, Answer Engine Optimization, Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), SEO, LLM Visibility AuditVendar profile field
Technologies
not statedVendar profile field
Workflow
Backlink profile and authority baseline, Prospecting, asset planning, and placement strategy, Outreach or PR execution, Link-quality review and monthly reportingAgency's own words
Onboarding
Discovery and backlink baseline, Priority-page alignment, Prospecting and publisher criteria, First campaign sprintAgency's own words
Reporting
monthlyAgency's own words

Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.

How confidence is computedHigh confidence
Confidence
High confidence, 78 of 100
Evidence posture
adequate: Usable as shortlist context: 3 of 10 documented work claims come from independent sources; check the sources before outreach.
Capped by
nothing: no cap applied
Best position confidence
n/a

It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. It is already at the top level. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.

Data completeness54/100
  • Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year16/20
  • Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
  • Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: hourly rate, setup fee13/20
  • Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 10 work claims10/30
  • Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
Trust in the data48/100
  • Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 3 of 10 work claims are independent22/30
  • Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 0 confirmed, 0 partly, of 14 with a source0/25
  • Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 10/20
  • Seen within the last 365 days: 18 of 1815/15
  • Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10

These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.

Limits and how to correct them
  • Independent proof of work is present (3 of 10 work claims); still check the sources for buyer fit.
  • 3 of 10 documented work claims come from independent sources; the rest are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
  • Commercial fit narrows if the buyer wants a very low-budget or broad generalist SEO retainer.
  • 8 of 18 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 10 come from an independent source.
  • Open: Decision layer complete: score, verdict, reason, best position (not ranked)
  • Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
  • Open: Every claim with a number carries a verbatim quote (0 of 1)
  • Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (3 of 10 work claims)
  • Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing)
  • Open: JSON-LD carries Vendar's rating as a Review and an absolute logo (built from the same view; checked on the live page by QA)
  • Open: Re-check date ahead and data younger than 180 days (data 3 days old)
  • Open: Claims with numbers carry a verbatim quote (0 of 1)
Machine-readable version

This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.

Schema
vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
Model
Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
Data as of
Nov 2, 2026
Generated
Verification
Verified
Sources checked
Apr 27, 2026
Citation readiness
Cite with the source context
  • Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
  • Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
  • Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Talk to uSERP

Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.

Participation disclosure

Public status, verification, and approved visibility

These badges explain the public relationship with Vendar. Paid visibility is disclosed here and only applies to approved surfaces; the audit score remains based on fit, proof, completeness, and risk signals.

Verified
Connect

No connected participation status is currently shown.

Verify

Trust review or verified profile status is visible to buyers.

Quarter package

No active package