No published ranking admits this vendor on documented work yet; the profile shows what is on file.
Not in any evidence-ranked listing yet: no independent claim documents work for a published need.
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
Published on the agency's own site. Each quote carries a badge saying where it comes from.
Clients consistently praise the agency for building custom software that fits their specific business processes, with high team adoption and strong ROI. No criticisms were found in any of the reviews. The reviews are consistent in their positive assessment of bespoke development over off-the-shelf tools.More
- Custom software tailored to business needs3
- Understanding of client processes2
- Team adoption and usability1
- ROI and value1
- Attention to detail1
“they built exactly what our business needed”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“The attention to detail and understanding of our processes was remarkable”
“Our team adoption was instant because it felt like it was made for us”
“The ROI exceeded our projections by 3x”
“The attention to detail”
No criticism in the quotes read.
- Bespoke/custom software development3
- Technology company
- Logistics company
- Healthcare organization
Show 3 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“They didn't just build software - they built exactly what our business needed. The attention to detail and understanding of our processes was remarkable.”
“Finally, software that works the way we work, not the other way around. Our team adoption was instant because it felt like it was made for us - because it was.”
“The ROI exceeded our projections by 3x. Bespoke development seemed expensive until we calculated the cost of forcing our processes into off-the-shelf tools.”
- Your business matches the client types on file (enterprises) and the industries on file (healthcare, retail).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Bespoke/custom software development (3 of 3 mentions).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
Price not disclosed. Ask for a quote and the minimum term.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 7 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- 3 of 3 results with a number do not say what year they were measured.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask who will do the work day to day and whether any of it is outsourced.
Not ranked yet, so there are no ranking neighbours to compare with.
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for withnocode.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterionNot ranked
No score yet: withnocode is not admitted to any evidence-ranked listing. The score appears with the first independent claim that documents work for a published need.
All claims in the feed7 of 7 on file · 0 of 7 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 7 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 7. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 3 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: none tagged to a ranked need. The full ledger of 7 is on the proof page.
A testimonial attributed to Sarah Mitchell, CTO of a FinTech Scale-up, says withnocode transformed a legacy system into a modern platform in 6 weeks.
Agency's own wordswithnocode.ioclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workin just 6 weeksQuote from the source page
"withnocode transformed our legacy system into a modern platform in just 6 weeks. The speed and quality exceeded all expectations."
A two-sided marketplace for a Boston accelerator-backed startup was launched in 10 weeks, achieving $500K GMV in 6 months and securing $1.5M Series A.
Agency's own wordswithnocode.ioclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Marketplace B2B Services Platform Two-sided marketplace for a Boston accelerator-backed startup. 10 weeks to launch $500K GMV in 6 months $1.5M Series A
A HIPAA-compliant telehealth MVP was developed for a California-based healthcare startup, taking 8 weeks to launch and achieving 10,000+ consultations.
Agency's own wordswithnocode.ioclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Healthcare Telehealth App MVP HIPAA-compliant telehealth MVP for a California-based healthcare startup. 8 weeks to launch HIPAA compliant 10,000+ consultations
A client identified as Jennifer Rodriguez, VP Technology at Miami Health Partners in Miami, Florida, states that the return on investment of the bespoke development exceeded projections by 3x.
Agency's own wordswithnocode.ioclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
The ROI exceeded our projections by 3x. Bespoke development seemed expensive until we calculated the cost of forcing our processes into off-the-shelf tools.
An HR SaaS MVP was validated with 50 US companies before full build, achieving 50 pilot customers and 90% retention within 5 weeks.
Agency's own wordswithnocode.ioclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
SaaS HR Management Tool HR SaaS MVP validated with 50 US companies before full build. 5 weeks to launch 50 pilot customers 90% retention
A client identified as Sarah Mitchell, COO of TechCorp Industries in New York, says withnocode built software that matched the company's business needs and processes.
Agency's own wordswithnocode.ioclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
They didn't just build software - they built exactly what our business needed. The attention to detail and understanding of our processes was remarkable.
A client identified as Marcus Weber, Director of Operations at EuroLogistics in Munich, Germany, reports that custom software built by withnocode saw instant team adoption.
Agency's own wordswithnocode.ioclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Finally, software that works the way we work, not the other way around. Our team adoption was instant because it felt like it was made for us - because it was.
Positions in every ranking0 rankings
Not admitted to any ranking yet.
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Miami, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Miami, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- enterpriseVendar profile field
- Industries
- Healthcare, RetailVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Boston accelerator-backed startup, California-based healthcare startup, Miami Health Partners, 50 US companies, TechCorp Industries, EuroLogisticsIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: reputation is weighted 5 of 100 and discounted when few reviews are on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2019Agency's own words
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- Mobile DevelopmentVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- n/a
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: team size16/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 3 cases with a named client and a result, 7 work claims19/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 7 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 7 confirmed, 0 partly, of 7 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 3 of 320/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 7 of 715/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 7 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- 7 of 7 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Decision layer complete: score, verdict, reason, best position (not ranked)
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 7 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (team size missing)
- Open: JSON-LD carries Vendar's rating as a Review and an absolute logo (built from the same view; checked on the live page by QA)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.