No published ranking admits this vendor on documented work yet; the profile shows what is on file.
Not in any evidence-ranked listing yet: no independent claim documents work for a published need.
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file (B2B companies, B2C brands, nonprofits) and the industries on file (corporate).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
Price not disclosed. Ask for a quote and the minimum term.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- Ask who will do the work day to day and whether any of it is outsourced.
Not ranked yet, so there are no ranking neighbours to compare with.
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Zen Den Web Design.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterionNot ranked
No score yet: Zen Den Web Design is not admitted to any evidence-ranked listing. The score appears with the first independent claim that documents work for a published need.
All claims in the feed3 of 3 on file · 3 of 3 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 3 claims on file: independent source 3 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 0. Independent share of work claims: 100%. 1 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: none tagged to a ranked need. The full ledger of 3 is on the proof page.
Zen Den Design designed the reviewer’s book and launched two websites, and helped integrate social media and SEO.
Independent sourcelocal.yahoo.comverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes work01/23/11Quote from the source page
Zen Den Design designed my book and launched two web sites for me, they helped integrate social media and SEO.
Zen Den Web Design updated text and photos on the website www.bestflowerleis.com. The reviewer said they were extremely pleased with the service.
Independent sourcelocal.yahoo.comverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes work01/13/11Quote from the source page
We are extremely pleased with the service we received from Chad at Zen Den Web Design on updates and changes to our website www.bestflowerleis.com
Zen Den Web Design provided web design, and the reviewer said Chad got them up and running in a week.
Independent sourcelocal.yahoo.comverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes work02/25/09Quote from the source page
I highly recommend Chad for web design. He got me up and running in a week.
Positions in every ranking0 rankings
Not admitted to any ranking yet.
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, CA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- San Francisco, CA, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- b2b, b2c, nonprofit, corporateVendar profile field
- Industries
- CorporateVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- www.bestflowerleis.comIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: reputation is weighted 5 of 100 and discounted when few reviews are on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: Few sources on file; treat it as a candidate and check the sources.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- n/a
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 3 work claims3/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 3 of 3 work claims are independent30/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 3 confirmed, 0 partly, of 3 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 3 of 315/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- Independent proof of work is present (3 of 3 work claims); still check the sources for buyer fit.
- Only one external source URL is exposed.
- 0 of 3 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 3 come from an independent source.
- Open: Decision layer complete: score, verdict, reason, best position (not ranked)
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: At least three named clients (1 named)
- Open: JSON-LD carries Vendar's rating as a Review and an absolute logo (built from the same view; checked on the live page by QA)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (1 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.