Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #10 Ecommerce SEO in Miami, of 10 · also in 8 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file (local businesses, small businesses) and the industries on file (small business, local business).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for an Ecommerce SEO case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #8 KAFURE Consulting Services36Ranks above on this question#8#10 this oneScore3633Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #9 Miami SEO Company35Ranks above on this question#9#10 this oneScore3533Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for AMM Firm.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#10 Ecommerce SEO in Miami: 33/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 8 | 27% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 12.4 | 50% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 10.6 | 71% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 7.2 | 72% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed5 of 5 on file · 0 of 5 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 5 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 5. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 1 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Local SEO 1 · SEO for High-Ticket Services 1 · Ecommerce SEO 1. The full ledger of 5 is on the proof page.
AMM Digital Marketing used a local SEO strategy for two furniture retailers in Miami. Over 24 months, the clients achieved #1 and #2 rankings for their respective searches, Map Pack dominance in their neighborhoods, a 623% increase in combined organic traffic, and $8.7M in attributed revenue.
Agency's own wordsammfirm.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes work24 monthsLocal SEOQuote from the source page
Campaign Duration: 24 months Primary Challenge: Differentiating two similar businesses in overlapping service areas Strategy: Niche specialization, audience segmentation, and complementary keyword targeting Combined Results: Client A: #1 ranking for “luxury contemporary furniture Miami” Client B: #2 ranking for “modern furniture stores Miami” Both clients achieved Map Pack dominance in their respective neighborhoods Combined organic traffic increase: +623% Zero keyword cannibalization between clients Total attributed revenue: $8.7M over 24 months
For Client A, AMM Digital Marketing published 47 articles; 12 ranked in the top 3 for luxury furniture terms, and an article captured a featured snippet.
Agency's own wordsammfirm.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workMonths 6-18SEO for High-Ticket ServicesQuote from the source page
Content Results: 47 published articles Average time on page: 4:32 12 articles ranking in top 3 for luxury furniture terms Featured snippet captured for “how to choose luxury contemporary furniture”
For Client A, AMM Digital Marketing's review-generation work increased reviews from 3 to 47, with an average rating of 4.9 stars.
Agency's own wordsammfirm.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workMonths 4-12Quote from the source page
Results: 3 → 47 reviews (controlled growth) Average rating: 4.9 stars
For Client B, AMM Digital Marketing implemented Shopify e-commerce functionality and created product collection pages by style.
Agency's own wordsammfirm.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workMonths 1-3Ecommerce SEOQuote from the source page
Website Technical SEO: Implemented e-commerce functionality (Shopify integration) Created product collection pages by style
For Client B, AMM Digital Marketing's review-generation work increased reviews from 11 to 128 and the average rating from 3.9 to 4.7 stars.
Agency's own wordsammfirm.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workMonths 4-12Quote from the source page
Results: 11 → 128 reviews (rapid growth) Average rating: 3.9 → 4.7 stars
Positions in every ranking9 rankings
9 positions: 9 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecommerce SEO · Miamion its own published cases | #10 of 10 | 33 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Local SEO · Miamion its own published cases | #22 of 24 | 38 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for High-Ticket Services · Miamion its own published cases | #27 of 28 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #101 of 112 | 28 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Chicagoon its own published cases | #101 of 112 | 28 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
4 more positionsHide the other 4
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecommerce SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #102 of 112 | 28 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #104 of 112 | 28 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #101 of 112 | 28 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #101 of 112 | 28 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Doral, FL, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Miami, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- local_business, small_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- Small Business, Local BusinessVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Client A and Client BIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- 1 month (month to month)
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Ecommerce SEO $3,500 (6 of 10 disclose) · Local SEO $2,000 (11 of 24 disclose) · SEO for High-Ticket Services $2,750 (12 of 28 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2004Agency's own words
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- SpanishVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: team size, logo14/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, setup fee3/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 4 cases with a named client and a result, 5 work claims21/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 5 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 5 confirmed, 0 partly, of 5 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 1 of 120/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 5 of 515/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names ecommerce SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Only one external source URL is exposed.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 5 of 5 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 5 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (team size missing)
- Open: At least three named clients (1 named)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (1 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.