Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #8 Content-led SEO in Miami, of 11 · also in 19 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
Published on the agency's own site. Each quote carries a badge saying where it comes from.
Clients most often describe improved search visibility, rankings, and customer discovery, alongside website work. None of these reviews mention criticism, though all three are testimonials published by the agency, so the feedback is consistently positive but limited to that source.More
- Improved rankings and traffic1
- Website redesign and cleaner appearance1
- Improved visibility1
- Better Google Maps presence and more calls1
“started getting much better rankings and traffic within a few months”
Show 3 more quotesHide quotes
“The site looks much cleaner now”
“we saw a strong increase in visibility after the launch”
“showing up better on Google Maps and getting more calls”
No criticism in the quotes read.
- Website redesign, SEO, and promotion1
- Local SEO, Google Business Profile, and website work1
- Tattoo numbing spray website or business
- Tattoo shop
Show 3 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“Our tattoo numbing spray website started getting much better rankings and traffic within a few months, especially for tattoo-related search terms that are super competitive.”
“Miami SEO Company helped us redesign the House of Leaves website and handled the SEO and promotion side of things as well. The site looks much cleaner now and we saw a strong increase in visibility after the launch.”
“These guys have been handling our local SEO, Google Business Profile, and website work and it's made a noticeable difference for the shop. We started showing up better on Google Maps and getting more calls from people finding us online.”
- Your business matches the client types on file (bilingual markets) and the industries on file (ecommerce, healthcare, real estate).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Website redesign, SEO, and promotion (1 of 2 mentions); Local SEO, Google Business Profile, and website work (1).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #7 Anderson Collaborative47Ranks above on this question#7#8 this oneScore4742Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #9 Unified Marketing35Ranks below on this question#9#8 this oneScore3542Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Miami SEO Company.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#8 Content-led SEO in Miami: 42/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 9 | 30% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.5 | 62% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 15 | 100% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 7.2 | 72% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed4 of 4 on file · 0 of 4 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 4 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 4. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 1 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Technical SEO 1 · Ecommerce SEO 1 · Content-led SEO 2 · Local SEO 1 · Small Business 1. The full ledger of 4 is on the proof page.
Miami SEO Company worked with Pro Numb, a tattoo numbing spray e-commerce brand, on e-commerce SEO including a foundation audit covering product page indexation, schema, and Core Web Vitals, plus topical authority mapping and content production. The client's review states the website 'started getting much better rankings and traffic within a few months' for competitive tattoo-related search terms.
Agency's own wordsmiamiseocompany.netclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workTechnical SEOEcommerce SEOContent-led SEOQuote from the source page
Our tattoo numbing spray website started getting much better rankings and traffic within a few months, especially for tattoo-related search terms that are super competitive.
Miami SEO Company redesigned the House of Leaves website and handled SEO and promotion for the niche book brand, including a full audit during the redesign and brand-voice content production. The client reports a strong increase in visibility after launch.
Agency's own wordsmiamiseocompany.netclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workContent-led SEOQuote from the source page
Miami SEO Company helped us redesign the House of Leaves website and handled the SEO and promotion side of things as well. The site looks much cleaner now and we saw a strong increase in visibility after the launch.
Miami SEO Company provided SEO for Pro Numb, a tattoo numbing spray e-commerce brand, and reviewer J.T. Zahnter reports the site 'started getting much better rankings and traffic within a few months, especially for tattoo-related search terms that are super competitive.' The review credits both SEO and overall online visibility, so the result is not attributable to one service.
Agency's own wordsmiamiseocompany.netclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workwithin a few monthsQuote from the source page
Our tattoo numbing spray website started getting much better rankings and traffic within a few months, especially for tattoo-related search terms that are super competitive. Communication has been solid the whole time and they've helped us with both SEO and overall online visibility.
Miami SEO Company handled local SEO, Google Business Profile, and website work for Reef Side Tattoo, a single-location tattoo shop in Melbourne, FL. Reviewer Justin Tyme reports the shop 'started showing up better on Google Maps and getting more calls from people finding us online.'
Agency's own wordsmiamiseocompany.netclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workLocal SEOSmall BusinessQuote from the source page
These guys have been handling our local SEO, Google Business Profile, and website work and it's made a noticeable difference for the shop. We started showing up better on Google Maps and getting more calls from people finding us online.
Positions in every ranking20 rankings
20 positions: 20 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content-led SEO · Miamion its own published cases | #8 of 11 | 42 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Chicagoon its own published cases | #63 of 87 | 33 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #63 of 87 | 33 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #64 of 88 | 33 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #65 of 87 | 33 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
15 more positionsHide the other 15
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content-led SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #64 of 87 | 33 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #66 of 87 | 33 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Miamion its own published cases | #9 of 10 | 35 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Miamion its own published cases | #11 of 12 | 37 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Local SEO · Miamion its own published cases | #23 of 24 | 37 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #94 of 115 | 28 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #104 of 112 | 26 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Chicagoon its own published cases | #104 of 112 | 26 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #105 of 112 | 26 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #108 of 112 | 26 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Small Business · Miamion its own published cases | #6 of 7 | 35 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #95 of 115 | 28 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #96 of 116 | 28 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #104 of 112 | 26 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #105 of 112 | 26 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Miami, FL, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Miami, FL, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- bilingual_marketVendar profile field
- Industries
- Ecommerce, Healthcare, Real Estate, Legal, Dental, Hospitality, Financial ServicesVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Pro Numb, House of Leaves, Reef Side TattooIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Content-led SEO $3,000 (5 of 11 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,500 (6 of 10 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (7 of 12 disclose) · Local SEO $2,000 (11 of 24 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 88 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Small Business $2,500 (3 of 7 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 116 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2014Agency's own words
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- SpanishVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: team size16/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 4 work claims4/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 4 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 4 confirmed, 0 partly, of 4 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 4 of 415/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names content-led SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Only one external source URL is exposed.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 4 of 4 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 4 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (team size missing)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (1 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.