Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. 3 of its 6 documented work claims come from an independent source.
Best position #14 SEO for Lead Generation in Phoenix, of 27 · also in 1 more ranking
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google4.8/523 reviews as of Nov 2, 2026Trustpilot3.2/51 review- 25% written in the last 12 months
- 8% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 48% of Google reviews answered
Clients consistently praise the agency's quality work, clear communication, and effective marketing strategies, with many reporting increased leads and visibility. One client strongly criticized a website project for poor usability and a significant drop in sales. Overall, reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a single negative outlier.More
- Communication and responsiveness4
- Quality of work and design4
- Marketing results and lead generation4
“communication was outstanding”
Show 2 more quotesHide quotes
“I absolutely love my Website!”
“We’ve seen a steady stream of new leads coming in every month.”
- Website usability and sales impact2
“The website he delivered was harder to use than the original.”
- Website design and development4
- Digital marketing and SEO4
- Branding and identity2
- Nonprofit
- Realtor
- Restaurant
Show 4 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“they've helped us grow our online presence, refine our brand, and continuously improve our website, SEO, and social media efforts. Their expertise and strategic guidance have led to increased visibility and greater awareness of our nonprofit's mission.”
“They provided exceptional guidance on how to approach our marketing strategies and delivered outstanding results. Thanks to their expertise, we've seen a significant increase in leads, which has truly made a positive impact on our business.”
“It was a pleasure working with Ruby and Anthony on my Website design. I absolutely love my Website! They went above and beyond to make sure they delivered exactly what my vision was for my website and I couldn't be more happy with the end result, they definitely exceed my expectations.”
“The owner has worked with AMEX, PayPal, U-Haul, and Apple on digital marketing projects.”
- Your business matches the client types on file (startups, enterprises) and the industries on file (healthcare, legal, professional services).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Website design and development (4 of 10 mentions); Digital marketing and SEO (4).
- Read the criticism first: "Website usability and sales impact" (2 of 24 reviews read).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for a SEO for Lead Generation case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask who will do the work day to day and whether any of it is outsourced.
- #13 Soderman SEO52Ranks above on this question#13#14 this oneScore5247Independent01PriceProjects from $1,000not disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #15 Nvent Marketing47Ranks below on this question#15#14 this oneScore4747Independent01Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Anthony's Agency.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#14 SEO for Lead Generation in Phoenix: 47/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 18 | 60% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.5 | 62% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 11.7 | 78% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0.5 | 10% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed6 of 8 on file · 3 of 6 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 8 claims on file: independent source 5 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 3. Independent share of work claims: 50%. 6 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: SEO for Lead Generation 2 · Local SEO 1. The full ledger of 8 is on the proof page.
The page presents an unnamed client's results, stating a screenshot shows the client's results in one year and that the client gets over 3300+ website leads every month. The client is not named, and the result is not attributed to a single service.
Agency's own wordsanthonysagency.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workin one yearSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
Below is a screenshot of our client's results in one year. Is your company getting over 3300+ website leads every month? Our client is getting customers every day from our partnership.
Client Sydney Henry of Trellis says Anthony's Agency helped the organization grow its online presence and improve its website, SEO, and social media efforts, leading to increased visibility and awareness of its nonprofit mission.
Independent sourcereportgarden.comverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
they've helped us grow our online presence, refine our brand, and continuously improve our website, SEO, and social media efforts. Their expertise and strategic guidance have led to increased visibility and greater awareness of our nonprofit's mission.
Client Nicholas Spaich says the agency's guidance on marketing strategy led to a significant increase in leads that had a positive impact on his business.
Independent sourcereportgarden.comverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
They provided exceptional guidance on how to approach our marketing strategies and delivered outstanding results. Thanks to their expertise, we've seen a significant increase in leads, which has truly made a positive impact on our business.
The agency's owner has worked with AMEX, PayPal, U-Haul, and Apple on digital marketing projects, and the agency specializes in local SEO.
Agency's own wordsanthonysagency.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workLocal SEOQuote from the source page
The owner has worked with AMEX, PayPal, U-Haul, and Apple on digital marketing projects. He has trained his team on best practices to maximize clients' ROI. Our agency specializes in local SEO.
The page states that the owner of Anthony's Agency has worked with AMEX, PayPal, U-Haul, and Apple on digital marketing projects. No results or time period are given for this work.
Agency's own wordsanthonysagency.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
The owner has worked with AMEX, PayPal, U-Haul, and Apple on digital marketing projects.
Client Ana Rivas says Anthony's Agency designed her website to match her vision and delivered a result that exceeded her expectations.
Independent sourcereportgarden.comverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
It was a pleasure working with Ruby and Anthony on my Website design. I absolutely love my Website! They went above and beyond to make sure they delivered exactly what my vision was for my website and I couldn't be more happy with the end result, they definitely exceed my expectations.
Positions in every ranking2 rankings
2 positions: 2 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 2 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO for Lead Generation · Phoenix | #14 of 27 | 47 | 2 (1 independent) | Confidence not rated yet | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Local SEO · Phoenixon its own published cases | #25 of 26 | 35 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Phoenix, AZ, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Phoenix, AZ, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- startup, enterpriseVendar profile field
- Industries
- Healthcare, Legal, Professional Services, Technology, Public SectorVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Sydney Henry, Nicholas Spaich, Ana Rivas, AMEXIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: SEO for Lead Generation $1,495 (11 of 27 disclose) · Local SEO $1,495 (12 of 26 disclose)
Reputation
- Google4.8 · 23 reviews
- Trustpilot3.2 · 1 reviews
How it counts: 1 third-party review at 3.2. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedModerate confidence
- Confidence
- Moderate confidence, 78 of 100
- Evidence posture
- adequate: Usable as shortlist context: 3 of 6 documented work claims come from independent sources; check the sources before outreach.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Confidence not rated yet
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is High confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size12/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 6 work claims6/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 1 platform with a rating and 10 or more reviews; Trustpilot: too few reviews to count8/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 3 of 6 work claims are independent30/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 6 confirmed, 0 partly, of 8 with a source19/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 1 of 120/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 6 of 811/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Independent proof of work is present (3 of 6 work claims); still check the sources for buyer fit.
- Best position rests on: Confirmed by an independent source.
- 3 of 8 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 5 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (6 of 8)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Cite with the source context
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.