Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. 1 of its 41 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #5 Mobile MVP Development in New York, of 11 · also in 13 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- 73% written in the last 12 months
- 0% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 30% of Google reviews answered
Clients most often value Appicoders’ professionalism, communication, responsiveness, and app quality. Reviews also describe organized work and delivery on schedule; one client says the agency was not the most price competitive. Feedback is consistently positive, though several testimonials were published by the agency.More
- Professionalism and reliable project handling12
- Meeting schedules and deadlines7
- Quality and attention to detail6
- Taking feedback and change requests on board2
“The service was professional and efficient at all times.”
Show 3 more quotesHide quotes
“The app was user-friendly, well-optimized, and delivered within the agreed timeframe.”
“Their team was responsive, knowledgeable, and committed to delivering quality results.”
“Changes were implemented quickly, and the app improved with each update.”
- Price competitiveness1
“Appicoders isn't the most price competitive among the offers I've received”
Show 2 more resultsHide results
- Mobile app development5
- Web version or extension of software2
- IoT device integration and automation1
- E-learning mobile app development1
- Business clients
- Healthcare organization or clinic
- Construction company
- Energy technology company
- Sports technology business
- Payments or financial technology company
Show 6 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“Appicoders successfully created a functioning app for both platforms. They had a solid project management system, and they worked within the deadline given to them.”
“Every part of the process went according to the agreed schedule and the finished prototype was met and in many cases exceeded my expectations. While Appicoders isn't the most price competitive among the offers I've received, the quality of their work, professionalism, and products makes the extra cost worth it.”
“I can't say enough about how great Appicoders has been as a partner over the past year. They always push the project forward and guarantee quality checks every step of the way”
“The Appicoders team is great for the job. Every part of the process went according to the agreed schedule and the finished prototype was met and in many cases exceeded my expectations.”
“Appicoders has put a lot of effort into delivering ProSport Connect, an exceptional mobile application demonstrated with strong technical expertise, clear communication and a commitment to quality throughout the development process.”
“The integration of IoT devices and automation features has significantly improved our operational efficiency and user experience. Their team was professional and we are extremely satisfied with the final outcome.”
- Your business matches the client types on file (startups, enterprises, small businesses) and the industries on file (ecommerce, healthcare, real estate).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Mobile app development (5 of 9 mentions); Web version or extension of software (2).
- Read the criticism first: "Price competitiveness" (1 of 11 reviews read).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
- Little outside recognition on file: fewer than two awards, certifications or press mentions with a source.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: only 1 independent account of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #4 iQlance Solutions50Ranks above on this question#4#5 this oneScore5047Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #6 Suffescom44Ranks below on this question#6#5 this oneScore4447Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Appicoders.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#5 Mobile MVP Development in New York: 47/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 9 | 30% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 19 | 76% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 8.4 | 56% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 7.2 | 72% |
|
| Transparency | 10 | 2.5 | 25% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 2.7 | 54% |
|
| Market credibilityweakest | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed20 of 43 on file · 1 of 41 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 43 claims on file: independent source 3 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 40. Independent share of work claims: 2.4%. 17 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Mobile MVP Development 2 · Mobile Backend and API Integration 1 · Mobile App Modernization 1. The full ledger of 43 is on the proof page.
Appicoders created a functioning app for both platforms for Elevance Health and worked within the given deadline.
Independent sourcetopdevelopers.coverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Appicoders successfully created a functioning app for both platforms. They had a solid project management system, and they worked within the deadline given to them.
Kevin Martin, a customer, states that the app development process went according to the agreed schedule and that the finished prototype met or exceeded his expectations.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workMobile MVP DevelopmentQuote from the source page
The Appicoders team is great for the job. Every part of the process went according to the agreed schedule and the finished prototype was met and in many cases exceeded my expectations.
Sarah Mitchell, Head of Operations of EnergyTech Solutions Inc., left a five-star testimonial stating that Appicoders' IoT integration and automation features significantly improved their operational efficiency and user experience.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workMobile Backend and API IntegrationQuote from the source page
The integration of IoT devices and automation features has significantly improved our operational efficiency and user experience. Their team was professional and we are extremely satisfied with the final outcome.
A client named Kevin Martin says the project followed the agreed schedule and the finished prototype met or exceeded his expectations, while noting Appicoders was not the most price competitive among offers received.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Every part of the process went according to the agreed schedule and the finished prototype was met and in many cases exceeded my expectations. While Appicoders isn't the most price competitive among the offers I've received, the quality of their work, professionalism, and products makes the extra cost worth it.
A client named Jessica Brown says Appicoders' team was receptive to corrections and change requests and that the project manager was professional.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Their team is very receptive to corrections and improvements and had no problems with change requests. The project manager they have is very professional and always has great solutions to offer.
Appicoders states it has created top-ranked apps for Fortune 500 companies MGM and Rite Aid.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
We've created top-ranked apps for Fortune 500 companies MGM and Rite Aid.
Appicoders lists a Rubberworx mobile app in its work showcase, described as using augmented reality and artificial intelligence to help users explore rubber flooring options.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
The Rubberworx Mobile App is a groundbreaking solution that blends the magic of augmented truth and synthetic intelligence to redefine the way you discover rubber flooring alternatives.
Sarah Rose recommended Appicoders, stating that they have been a great partner over the past year and always push the project forward while guaranteeing quality checks.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workover the past yearQuote from the source page
I can't say enough about how great Appicoders has been as a partner over the past year. They always push the project forward and guarantee quality checks every step of the way, even the parts of my app that I have to pick up before sending it to development. I will definitely recommend Appicoders to all my clients and place them at the top of my list of partners to work with.
Kevin Martin recommended Appicoders' service, noting that the finished prototype was met and in many cases exceeded expectations.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workMobile MVP DevelopmentMobile App ModernizationQuote from the source page
The Appicoders team is great for the job. Every part of the process went according to the agreed schedule and the finished prototype was met and in many cases exceeded my expectations. While Appicoders isn't the most price competitive among the offers I've received, the quality of their work, professionalism, and products makes the extra cost worth it. I highly recommend their service and will continue to use it for future projects.
A client states that Appicoders delivered a finished prototype on the agreed schedule that met or exceeded expectations, and that Appicoders was not the most price competitive among offers received but the quality made the extra cost worth it.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Every part of the process went according to the agreed schedule and the finished prototype was met and in many cases exceeded my expectations. While Appicoders isn't the most price competitive among the offers I've received, the quality of their work, professionalism, and products makes the extra cost worth it.
A client states that Appicoders has been a partner over the past year, pushing the project forward and conducting quality checks at every step.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workthe past yearQuote from the source page
I can't say enough about how great Appicoders has been as a partner over the past year. They always push the project forward and guarantee quality checks every step of the way
A client named Kevin Martin states the project followed the agreed schedule and that the finished prototype met or exceeded his expectations, though he notes Appicoders was not the most price-competitive option.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Every part of the process went according to the agreed schedule and the finished prototype was met and in many cases exceeded my expectations.
A client named Sarah Rose describes Appicoders as a partner over the past year, saying they pushed the project forward and performed quality checks at every step.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workthe past yearQuote from the source page
I can't say enough about how great Appicoders has been as a partner over the past year.
A client named kevin martin states that Appicoders delivered a finished prototype on the agreed schedule that met and in many cases exceeded his expectations, and that Appicoders was not the most price competitive among the offers he received.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Every part of the process went according to the agreed schedule and the finished prototype was met and in many cases exceeded my expectations. While Appicoders isn't the most price competitive among the offers I've received, the quality of their work, professionalism, and products makes the extra cost worth it.
A client named sarah rose states that Appicoders has been a partner over the past year on app development work, pushing the project forward and carrying out quality checks, including on parts of the app the client handles before sending to development.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workover the past yearQuote from the source page
I can't say enough about how great Appicoders has been as a partner over the past year. They always push the project forward and guarantee quality checks every step of the way, even the parts of my app that I have to pick up before sending it to development.
Appicoders lists NetFusionary as a project in its Work Showcase, described as a platform for event creation, user account management, and connecting businesses.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Explore how the NetFusionary platform revolutionizes efficient event creation, user account management, connecting businesses, and creating profitable relationships with ease.
A customer named Kevin Martin states the Appicoders team delivered a finished prototype on the agreed schedule, that the prototype met or exceeded his expectations, and that while Appicoders was not the most price competitive among offers received, the quality justified the cost.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Every part of the process went according to the agreed schedule and the finished prototype was met and in many cases exceeded my expectations. While Appicoders isn't the most price competitive among the offers I've received, the quality of their work, professionalism, and products makes the extra cost worth it.
A customer named Kevin Martin says Appicoders delivered a prototype on the agreed schedule that met or exceeded his expectations, and that Appicoders was not the most price competitive but the quality and professionalism justified the cost.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Every part of the process went according to the agreed schedule and the finished prototype was met and in many cases exceeded my expectations. While Appicoders isn't the most price competitive among the offers I've received, the quality of their work, professionalism, and products makes the extra cost worth it.
A customer named Sarah Rose says she has worked with Appicoders as a partner over the past year, that they push the project forward and conduct quality checks at every step, and she will recommend them to her clients.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
I can't say enough about how great Appicoders has been as a partner over the past year. They always push the project forward and guarantee quality checks every step of the way
Appicoders lists ProQuestor as a project: a mobile application that helps professionals aged 20 to 55 find career paths and recommended apps based on their skills and passions.
Agency's own wordsappicoders.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Discover your dream career with the ProQuestor App! This consumer-pleasant cellular application empowers experts elderly 20 to 55 to discover tailored professional paths and encouraged apps based on their abilities and passions.
Positions in every ranking14 rankings
14 positions: 14 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile MVP Development · New Yorkon its own published cases | #5 of 11 | 47 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile MVP Development · Chicagoon its own published cases | #12 of 25 | 38 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile MVP Development · Houstonon its own published cases | #13 of 25 | 38 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile MVP Development · Phoenixon its own published cases | #10 of 25 | 38 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile MVP Development · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #12 of 25 | 38 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
9 more positionsHide the other 9
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile MVP Development · Miamion its own published cases | #12 of 25 | 38 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile App Modernization · New Yorkon its own published cases | #5 of 11 | 45 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile App Modernization · Miamion its own published cases | #12 of 23 | 37 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile Backend and API Integration · New Yorkon its own published cases | #15 of 18 | 43 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile Backend and API Integration · Phoenixon its own published cases | #46 of 65 | 35 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile App Modernization · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #10 of 23 | 37 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile App Modernization · Phoenixon its own published cases | #11 of 23 | 37 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile App Modernization · Houstonon its own published cases | #12 of 23 | 37 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile App Modernization · Chicagoon its own published cases | #13 of 23 | 37 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- New York, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- New York, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- startup, enterprise, small_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- Ecommerce, Healthcare, Real Estate, Education, Restaurants, Fitness, SportsVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Elevance Health, Kevin Martin, Sarah Mitchell, Jessica Brown, MGM and Rite Aid, Rubberworx, Sarah Rose, NetFusionaryIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (1 of 11 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $5,500 (2 of 11 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (2 of 25 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $6,000 (5 of 23 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (2 of 25 disclose) · Mobile Backend and API Integration n/a (0 of 18 disclose) · Mobile Backend and API Integration $5,000 (8 of 65 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (2 of 25 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $6,000 (5 of 23 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $6,000 (5 of 23 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (2 of 25 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (2 of 25 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $6,000 (5 of 23 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $6,000 (5 of 23 disclose)
Reputation
- Google5 · 11 reviews
- Trustpilot3.7 · 1 reviews
How it counts: 12 third-party reviews at 4.9. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2014Agency's own words
- Team size
- 100+Agency's own words
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- Mobile DevelopmentVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedModerate confidence
- Confidence
- Moderate confidence, 78 of 100
- Evidence posture
- adequate: Usable as shortlist context: 1 of 41 documented work claims come from independent sources; check the sources before outreach.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is High confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: logo18/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 41 work claims10/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 1 platform with a rating and 10 or more reviews; Trustpilot: too few reviews to count8/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 1 of 41 work claims are independent2/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 41 confirmed, 0 partly, of 43 with a source24/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 41 of 4314/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names mobile MVP development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Usable as shortlist context with a caveat: 1 of 41 documented work claims come from independent sources; the rest are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- 1 of 41 documented work claims come from independent sources; the rest are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 40 of 43 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 3 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (41 of 43)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (1 of 41 work claims)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Cite with the source context
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.