DevelopmentMobile DevelopmentNew YorkMobile Backend and API Integration
New York / Mobile Backend and API Integration

Best Mobile Backend and API Integration Companies in New York (2026)

18 of 44 agencies are ranked on documented mobile backend and API integration work; 0 confirmed by an independent source; payment does not affect the order.

Data as of November 2, 2026 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · How this ranking works ↓

Vendar ranks 18 of 44 Mobile Development agencies serving New York for mobile backend and API integration: the ones with documented mobile backend and API integration work on file. The top three by evidence-weighted score are TekRevol (53/100), DOOR3 (51) and Apptunix (50). 1 of them has documented mobile backend and API integration work for clients in New York itself. No paid placements; every position below cites its sources. 26 New York Mobile Development agencies have no mobile backend and API integration claim on file and are listed unranked.

The answer in three lines

Compare top 3
  1. 1TekRevol 53 · price not disclosed · clients 4.0/5 (37)5 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
  2. 2DOOR3 51 · price not disclosed · clients 4.5/5 (15)3 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
  3. 3Apptunix 50 · price not disclosed · clients 4.2/5 (29)4 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site

Budget in New York: 0 of 18 ranked agencies disclose a price; too few monthly floors to state a range.

18 ranked agencies

BudgetSort
For
1
TekRevol logo

TekRevol

New York, USA · team 50+ · since 2018

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.0/5 (37) Agency's own published cases

In the Kinder Morgan case study, TekRevol reports the app monitors 100+ operational metrics in real-time across multiple teams, with 95% of internal users… (Agency's own words, tekrevol.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

53/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
2
DOOR3 logo

DOOR3

New York, NY, USA · team 250 · since 2002

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.5/5 (15) Agency's own published cases

DOOR3 developed three applications for Leon Market, integrating them into the stock level management within their SAP backend for supermarket operations. (Agency's own words, door3.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

51/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
3A

Apptunix

New York, NY, USA · team 700+

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.2/5 (29) Agency's own published cases

Apptunix built a mobile app and backend rebuild for Namshi, a fashion e-commerce platform, resulting in 2.4X faster checkout completion and a 36% increase… (Agency's own words, apptunix.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

50/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
4T

TechGropse

New York, USA

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed · clients 5.0/5 (2) Agency's own published cases

…Arabia, healthcare), using React Native for mobile.NET for backend, SQL Server for database, and Azure for hosting. (Agency's own words, locations.techgropse.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

50/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
5
iQlance Solutions logo

iQlance Solutions

New York, NY, USA · team 51-200 · since 2010

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.7/5 (10) Agency's own published cases

iQlance Solutions created the Commercial Movers app, a business management platform built with Flutter, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB, delivered from idea to launch in 6 months for a client in New York… (Agency's own words, iqlance.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

50/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
6
Winklix logo

Winklix

New York, NY, USA · team 220+ · since 2014

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed · clients 3.9/5 (3) Agency's own published cases

…including security updates, performance optimization, and API integrations. (Agency's own words, winklix.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

48/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
7
TechnBrains logo

TechnBrains

New York, NY, USA · since 2013

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.5/5 (28) Agency's own published cases

The BUILT BY DETERMINATION app was built on React, React Native.NET and Azure, with integrations for Agora, Sandgird, Google API and Stripe. (Agency's own words, technbrains.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

47/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
8
Trango Tech logo

Trango Tech

New York, NY, USA · team 100+ developers · since 2003

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed Agency's own published cases

…and the app has reached 50k downloads with a stable backend. (Agency's own words, trangotech.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

47/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
9
Hyperlocal Cloud logo

Hyperlocal Cloud

New York, NY, USA · team 50+

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed Agency's own published cases

The case study describes work for the Texas Lottery App, including AI-powered edge barcode scanning and backend microservices. It reports 85% faster… (Agency's own words, hyperlocalcloud.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

46/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
10
Codknox logo

Codknox

New York, NY, USA

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed · clients 5.0/5 (5) Agency's own published cases

ZDelivery: …Web with online order management, inventory management and payment integration. (Agency's own words, codknox.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

46/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
26 more agencies serve New York, but without externally confirmed mobile backend and API integration work
Frequently asked questions (7)
How many New York Mobile Development agencies have documented mobile backend and API integration work?
18 of the 44 Mobile Development agencies Vendar tracks in New York have at least one mobile backend and API integration claim on file under the published rubric; 0 of the 18 ranked have an outside source naming it, and 0 have one that describes the work rather than listing the service. The other 26 New York agencies are listed unranked until evidence is added.
Which of them have worked for clients in New York?
1 of the 18 ranked agencies have documented mobile backend and API integration work for a client in New York: iQlance Solutions (#5, New York). The others are ranked on work for clients elsewhere.
Which New York mobile backend and API integration agency fits my type of business?
By the clients named in their documented mobile backend and API integration work: Dental, medical and wellness: New York App Devs (#14); Shops, restaurants and retail: Zimble Code (#16). This comes from client reviews and case studies on file, not from the agencies' own positioning; the number after each name is its place in the ranking.
What does mobile backend and API integration cost in New York?
Pricing is disclosed by 0 of 18 ranked agencies; not enough monthly floors are on file to state a range.
Which of them are verified?
0 of 18 ranked agencies are verified. Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.
How is this list different from the New York Mobile Development page?
The New York Mobile Development page ranks every Mobile Development agency serving the city. This page keeps only the agencies with mobile backend and API integration evidence on file, scores them on the mobile backend and API integration query with the published model, and cites the claims behind every position. The model, its weights and the rubric are on the How we rank page.
When was this list updated?
Scores are recomputed from the profiles whenever a profile changes; the ranking model is version 2026.11.7.
All detailsThe full table, the rubric, the rules and the limits: the same data the machine feed serves for this ranking.Open ↓
D1Full ranking table18 ranked · click a column to sort
#AgencyScoreEvid./30Fit/25Capab./15Reliab./10Transp./10Reput./5Cred./5Pen.Conf.ClaimsVerified
1TekRevol5315.1199.462.53.20-20.85/0Not verified
2DOOR35112.5198.87.22.52.70-20.83/0Not verified
3Apptunix5015.3198.932.53.10-20.84/0Not verified
4TechGropse5013.61913.8301.21.3-20.85/0Not verified
5iQlance Solutions5011.2199.67.22.52.40-20.84/0Not verified
6Winklix4812198.17.22.51.20-20.82/0Not verified
7TechnBrains4712.515.58.77.203.31.3-20.83/0Not verified
8Trango Tech4711199.27.22.500-20.82/0Not verified
9Hyperlocal Cloud4612199.532.52.10-20.82/0Not verified
10Codknox4611.61911.6301.91.3-20.85/0Not verified
11BitsWits4610.515.997.22.52.70-20.83/0Not verified
12Moon Technolabs46915.98.17.22.54.41.3-20.82/0Not verified
13JumpGrowth4313.312.4962.51.70-20.84/0Not verified
14New York App Devs4312.5199301.20-20.83/0Not verified
15Appicoders436197.97.22.52.70-20.81/0Not verified
16Zimble Code4214.31910.33000-50.84/0Not verified
17Suffescom4161987.22.500-20.81/0Not verified
18Utility356197.9300.60-20.81/0Not verified

Pool 44 · ranked 18 · unranked 26 (17 with profile tags only) · verified 0 · pricing disclosed 0 · case studies on file 0 · an outside source names the work 0 · an outside document describes it 0

Claims: claims for this need in the feed / of them from a third party. Confidence is the number behind the High, Moderate and Lower labels; it never changes the order.

D1Breakdown per agencyPoints, facts, claims with weights and reviews behind every position
#1 TekRevol53/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 50 claims on file

Evidence for this query15.1/300.5045 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; In the Kinder Morgan case study, TekRevol reports the app monitors 100+ operational metrics in real-time across multiple teams, with 95%… (tekrevol.com, claimed); TekRevol engineered Roll App’s community chat platform for real-time communication. The page reports 0s latency, 0% data loss, and 99.9%… (tekrevol.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in New York (New York, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth9.4/150.6251 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 5 of 50 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability6/100.6In business since 2018; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 50+; Process not documented
Reputation3.2/50.63237 third-party reviews at 4.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • In the Kinder Morgan case study, TekRevol reports the app monitors 100+ operational metrics in real-time across multiple teams, with 95% of internal users accessing vital business information via the app.

    Agency's own words · tekrevol.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • TekRevol engineered Roll App’s community chat platform for real-time communication. The page reports 0s latency, 0% data loss, and 99.9% uptime.

    Agency's own words · tekrevol.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • TekRevol describes integrating real-time data features, backend APIs, and role-specific access control during agile development for Kinder Morgan's mobile app.

    Agency's own words · tekrevol.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • TekRevol developed a mobile application for Kinder Morgan that delivered real-time data, enhanced role-based access, and user-friendly reporting features, built in React Native with Role-Based Access Control (RBAC).

    Agency's own words · tekrevol.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The Rise Up Kings engagement covered end-to-end product engineering, delivering a mobile app for members and a web admin portal with multi-pillar habit tracking, real-time chat, tier-based content, and gamification.

    Agency's own words · tekrevol.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.5 from 11 reviews; Trustpilot 3.8 from 26 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#2 DOOR351/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 42 claims on file

Evidence for this query12.5/300.4173 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; DOOR3 developed three applications for Leon Market, integrating them into the stock level management within their SAP backend for… (door3.com, claimed); DOOR3 partnered with Boon.ai to reposition its predictive signals product as an AI-first go-to-market copilot, developing a new… (door3.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in New York (New York, NY, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth8.8/150.5891 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 3 of 42 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2002; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 250; Process not documented
Reputation2.7/50.54215 third-party reviews at 4.5
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • DOOR3 developed three applications for Leon Market, integrating them into the stock level management within their SAP backend for supermarket operations.

    Agency's own words · door3.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • DOOR3 partnered with Boon.ai to reposition its predictive signals product as an AI-first go-to-market copilot, developing a new AI-integrated user experience and application interface.

    Agency's own words · door3.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • DOOR3 partnered with Boon.ai to reinvigorate the user experience of its predictive signals product with AI integrations, building an AI-first application interface.

    Agency's own words · door3.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.5 from 15 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#3 Apptunix50/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 52 claims on file

Evidence for this query15.3/300.5084 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Apptunix built a mobile app and backend rebuild for Namshi, a fashion e-commerce platform, resulting in 2.4X faster checkout completion… (apptunix.com, claimed); The apps for Expo City Eats were natively built and connected through a robust backend utilizing Node.js and MongoDB. (apptunix.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in New York (New York, NY, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names enterprise clients
Capability depth8.9/150.5961 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 4 of 52 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 700+; Process not documented
Reputation3.1/50.6229 third-party reviews at 4.2
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Apptunix built a mobile app and backend rebuild for Namshi, a fashion e-commerce platform, resulting in 2.4X faster checkout completion and a 36% increase in returning customers.

    Agency's own words · apptunix.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The apps for Expo City Eats were natively built and connected through a robust backend utilizing Node.js and MongoDB.

    Agency's own words · apptunix.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Apptunix performed Flutter-based app performance optimization for Amber, including bug fixes, UI enhancements, and app store compliance updates, alongside integration support with loyalty APIs and partner systems.

    Agency's own words · apptunix.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Apptunix developed a multi-app ecosystem for Expo City Dubai, including 2 user-facing apps and 3 operational panels, built with native Android and iOS capabilities and a real-time delivery flow.

    Agency's own words · apptunix.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 4 reviews; Trustpilot 4.1 from 25 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#4 TechGropse50/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 15 claims on file

Evidence for this query13.6/300.4545 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; TechGropse developed an online appointment booking app with secure in-app messaging for King Khalid (Saudi Arabia, healthcare), using… (locations.techgropse.com, claimed); For Zayed University (UAE, education), TechGropse performed a UI/UX transformation, mobile app modernization, and migration to the Flutter… (locations.techgropse.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in New York (New York, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth13.8/150.9171 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 5 of 15 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency0/100Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation1.2/50.2392 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: a press mention per rightfirms.co; Sources: rightfirms.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • TechGropse developed an online appointment booking app with secure in-app messaging for King Khalid (Saudi Arabia, healthcare), using React Native for mobile.NET for backend, SQL Server for database, and Azure for hosting.

    Agency's own words · locations.techgropse.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • For Zayed University (UAE, education), TechGropse performed a UI/UX transformation, mobile app modernization, and migration to the Flutter framework, with third-party integrations. The stated outcomes were successful deployment across iOS and Android and a unified digital ecosystem for university communities.

    Agency's own words · locations.techgropse.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • TechGropse built an AI-powered health insurance app for Saudi Enaya in Saudi Arabia using React Native, React, AWS, MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and Node.js. The stated results were increased accessibility, faster claims processing, boosted trust in digital services, and improved insurance awareness.

    Agency's own words · locations.techgropse.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • TechGropse developed Artera, an AI-powered beauty app with personalized colour recommendations, real-time beauty analysis, and styling suggestions. The page reports 1K+ downloads.

    Agency's own words · locations.techgropse.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • The page describes Verento as a mobile app for documenting property condition and move-out verification, using a mobile app and AI integration. It reports 10k+ downloads.

    Agency's own words · locations.techgropse.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 2 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#5 iQlance Solutions50/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 36 claims on file

Evidence for this query11.2/300.3754 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; iQlance Solutions created the Commercial Movers app, a business management platform built with Flutter, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB… (iqlance.com, claimed); iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB, taken from… (iqlance.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in New York (New York, NY, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth9.6/150.6391 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 4 of 36 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2010; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 51-200; Process not documented
Reputation2.4/50.48910 third-party reviews at 4.7
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • iQlance Solutions created the Commercial Movers app, a business management platform built with Flutter, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB, delivered from idea to launch in 6 months for a client in New York, USA.

    Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB, taken from idea to launch in 8 months in Dallas, USA.

    Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app; the page lists this project in Dallas, USA with an 8 months idea-to-launch timeline, built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB.

    Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app, for a client in Dallas, USA, built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS and Mongo DB and launched 8 months after the initial idea.

    Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 7 reviews; Trustpilot 4 from 3 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#6 Winklix48/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 65 claims on file

Evidence for this query12/300.42 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; The case study states Winklix continues to provide long-term maintenance and support for both MTailor's web platform and mobile… (winklix.com, claimed); Winklix built a scalable cloud-enabled architecture for OnTheMarket with load balancing and optimized backend APIs for large-scale… (winklix.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in New York (New York, NY, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names enterprise clients
Capability depth8.1/150.53799999999999991 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 65 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2014; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 220+; Process not documented
Reputation1.2/50.2353 third-party reviews at 3.9
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • The case study states Winklix continues to provide long-term maintenance and support for both MTailor's web platform and mobile applications, including security updates, performance optimization, and API integrations.

    Agency's own words · winklix.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Winklix built a scalable cloud-enabled architecture for OnTheMarket with load balancing and optimized backend APIs for large-scale traffic, and continues to provide long-term application management including infrastructure monitoring and CI/CD release support.

    Agency's own words · winklix.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Trustpilot 3.9 from 3 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#7 TechnBrains47/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 48 claims on file

Evidence for this query12.5/300.4173 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; The BUILT BY DETERMINATION app was built on React, React Native.NET and Azure, with integrations for Agora, Sandgird, Google API and Stripe. (technbrains.com, claimed); Get Spruce's Operations Lead said TechnBrains rebuilt the platform with mobile access, adaptive pricing, and real-time dashboards, letting… (technbrains.com, claimed)
Fit to this query15.5/250.62Headquartered in New York (New York, NY, USA); Pricing not disclosed
Capability depth8.7/150.5781 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 3 of 48 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2013; Retention not documented
Transparency0/100Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation3.3/50.657999999999999928 third-party reviews at 4.5
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: an award per truefirms.co; Sources: truefirms.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • The BUILT BY DETERMINATION app was built on React, React Native.NET and Azure, with integrations for Agora, Sandgird, Google API and Stripe.

    Agency's own words · technbrains.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Get Spruce's Operations Lead said TechnBrains rebuilt the platform with mobile access, adaptive pricing, and real-time dashboards, letting them serve 685K+ customers faster and more reliably.

    Agency's own words · technbrains.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • TechnBrains built PlateTalk, an app for vehicle management and real-time communication. The page describes vehicle registration, location tracking, and a connected social ecosystem for drivers.

    Agency's own words · technbrains.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.7 from 13 reviews; Trustpilot 4.4 from 15 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#8 Trango Tech47/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 22 claims on file

Evidence for this query11/300.3672 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; A client reviewer identified as Jason Tailor, Accountant, says Trango Tech built an app from a rough wireframe and the app has reached 50k… (trangotech.com, claimed); Trango Tech digitalized MatchBox's matchmaking process by building a dating app for Canadian Muslims with an integrated AI-based matching… (trangotech.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in New York (New York, NY, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names healthcare clients
Capability depth9.2/150.6141 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 22 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2003; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 100+ developers; Process not documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • A client reviewer identified as Jason Tailor, Accountant, says Trango Tech built an app from a rough wireframe and the app has reached 50k downloads with a stable backend.

    Agency's own words · trangotech.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Trango Tech digitalized MatchBox's matchmaking process by building a dating app for Canadian Muslims with an integrated AI-based matching system.

    Agency's own words · trangotech.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

#9 Hyperlocal Cloud46/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 19 claims on file

Evidence for this query12/300.42 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; The case study describes work for the Texas Lottery App, including AI-powered edge barcode scanning and backend microservices. It reports… (hyperlocalcloud.com, claimed); A client named Manuel says the vendor developed his food delivery app with several features and integrations, and that the app works… (hyperlocalcloud.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in New York (New York, NY, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names healthcare clients
Capability depth9.5/150.6321 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 19 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 50+; Process not documented
Reputation2.1/50.4298 third-party reviews at 4.5
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • The case study describes work for the Texas Lottery App, including AI-powered edge barcode scanning and backend microservices. It reports 85% faster barcode scanning, 99.9% app availability, a 15% increase in net revenue, and 60% fewer support tickets.

    Agency's own words · hyperlocalcloud.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • A client named Manuel says the vendor developed his food delivery app with several features and integrations, and that the app works smoothly.

    Agency's own words · hyperlocalcloud.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

#10 Codknox46/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 23 claims on file

Evidence for this query11.6/300.3875 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Codknox lists a case study for ZDelivery, a grocery delivery app it built for iOS, Android and Web with online order management, inventory… (codknox.com, claimed); Codknox built GIGGO, a logistics platform with real-time tracking, instant quotes, and last-mile delivery across multiple countries… (codknox.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in New York (New York, NY, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth11.6/150.7721 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 5 of 23 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency0/100Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation1.9/50.3895 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: a press mention per topdevelopers.co; Sources: topdevelopers.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Codknox lists a case study for ZDelivery, a grocery delivery app it built for iOS, Android and Web with online order management, inventory management and payment integration.

    Agency's own words · codknox.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Codknox built GIGGO, a logistics platform with real-time tracking, instant quotes, and last-mile delivery across multiple countries, delivered on iOS, Android, and Web.

    Agency's own words · codknox.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Codknox built ZDelivery, an iOS, Android, and Web grocery delivery app with online order management, inventory management, and payment integration.

    Agency's own words · codknox.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Codknox lists ZDelivery in its portfolio, describing it as a grocery delivery app with online order management, inventory management, and payment integration.

    Agency's own words · codknox.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Codknox lists ZDelivery, a grocery delivery app with online order management, inventory management and payment integration, as a project it built for iOS, Android and web.

    Agency's own words · codknox.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 5 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Positions 11 to 18: the same breakdown is on each agency's profile, linked from the table above, and in the machine-readable version below.

D2What counts as evidence for this questionRubric 2026.11

A claim counts as backend and API evidence when a source on file names a backend, REST or GraphQL API, cloud setup (Firebase, AWS, Azure) or an integration with another system (payments, CRM, EHR, ERP, hardware) the company built for an app, ideally with the client named.

Terms that count:
api, apis, rest api, graphql, backend, back-end, firebase, aws, azure, microservices, integration, integrations, integrated, stripe, payment integration, real-time, bluetooth
Minimum to be ranked:
1 claim on file under this rubric, of which 1 from a source outside Vendar.
Budget band:
no budget band for this question

In plain words: a case counts when it names mobile backend and API integration work and where it was published can be checked.

D3Eligibility and orderWho is admitted, how ties break, what payment does

Ranked vendors have at least 1 claim on file that supports mobile backend and API integration under the published rubric, of which at least 1 comes from a source outside Vendar; the rest are listed unranked.

  • The vendor lists the page's service on its profile.
  • The vendor serves the page's market: headquarters or a listed service region in the city. When a need page has fewer than ten ranked vendors from the city, agencies from other cities join it only if they are headquartered in the same state or have published work (a case study, a project, a client review) that names the city or its state. A line saying a company serves the whole country is not enough. They are ranked by the same score, geography counts 0.3 for them, and each position says where the agency works from. Mobile development is bought remotely, so its city pages take agencies from anywhere in the United States under the same condition: documented work for the need. The same holds for SEO needs bought remotely: international, enterprise, consulting, recovery, marketplaces, startups, B2B SaaS, ecommerce, AI search visibility, audits, technical and content-led SEO. Local SEO, small business, lead generation and high-ticket services stay with agencies from the city and its state.
  • A need page that still has fewer than ten ranked agencies after that is filled from the city's own agencies whose sources say they offer the need but document no project for it yet. They always stand below every agency with documented work, are labelled "Offers this service; no documented project on file yet", carry lower confidence, and do not count toward the threshold that opens a page to search engines.
  • For an intent page, at least one claim on file supports the intent under the page's rubric, and at least one of those claims comes from a source outside Vendar. Our own service listings and profile tags describe the intent but document nothing, so they add weight to a vendor that already has outside evidence and never earn a rank on their own. Vendors without outside evidence appear below the ranking, unranked, never padded into it.
  • For an intent page, at least one of those claims documents work the vendor has done: a case study, a project or portfolio entry, or a client review. Service pages, price lists, positioning statements and directory listings say what a vendor offers, not what it did; they add weight to a vendor that already has documented work and never earn a documented position. They can only fill a page that is short of ten, below every documented position and labelled as such (see below).
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site. It is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" until an independent source documents the same kind of work.
  • Filtered views (an entry price, a pricing model, a team size) are not rankings of their own: they show agencies ranked for at least one need in the city, each with the score of its best need, and keep only those that meet the condition. An agency that does not publish the fact is listed below with the reason.
  • Draft and needs-data profiles are never listed.
  • Rank order is the score, highest first. Ties break on evidence points, then on the number of third-party claims, then alphabetically.
  • There is no hidden ordering: no hand-curated slug lists and no paid boost in the sort on any listing.
  • If an editor overrides a position, the position is labelled as an editorial placement with a written reason and ordering_basis set to editorial. No such placements exist on evidence-ranked pages today.
  • Every ranked position explains itself from its score components and cites the claims behind them, with their sources.
  • Sort: score_out_of_100, highest first; ties break on evidence points, then third-party claim count, then name.
  • Payment: Paid visibility never changes the order of a listing.
  • Top-list threshold: An intent page is offered to search engines when its ranked list has at least five evidence-backed vendors (three when the city has fewer than twenty vendors for the service). Only agencies from the city itself (headquarters or a listed service region) with documented work count toward it: agencies filled in from other cities and agencies that only offer the need do not. A page whose list rests mostly on agencies from other cities is titled “agencies serving” the city instead of “best agencies in” it, says how many are local, stays on the city page and in its feed, and is kept out of search engines until enough local agencies document the work; otherwise the same national list would stand behind six city pages. Below the threshold even with outside agencies the page stays published with noindex, keeps its URL, links and feed, and is left out of the city page's list of rankings. A page whose top ten repeats 70% or more of another need's top ten in the same city, or has the same top three, also stays noindex while the stronger of the two is offered; it opens when the lists differ. The same holds across cities: of the pages for one need whose top tens share 70% or more, only the one with the most local agencies is offered to search engines.

Weights: Evidence for this query 30 · Fit to this query 25 · Capability depth 15 · Reliability 10 · Transparency 10 · Reputation 5 · Market credibility 5. Penalties: Profile flagged for review -5 · Evidence not re-checked in 18 months -5 · No independent source on file -3 · Profile below decision-ready status -2.

D4How claims are counted
  • Paid agency directories that sell placement are not a source. Their reviews are not cited, never support a position and do not count toward reputation; a profile may show how many reviews such directories hold as one unnamed figure, for context only. Ratings come from open review platforms: Google, Trustpilot and BBB.
  • Provenance is recorded per claim: third_party, first_party, internal (a Vendar profile field) or unknown.
  • Verification status is recorded per claim: verified, claimed, internal_signal or unverified.
  • Every record on file has a role: a claim states a fact; a source reference is a link without a statement (an official site, a directory profile); a research note is Vendar's own remark. Only claims count as evidence. A source reference never earns weight, however its title reads, and a research note never reaches a page or a feed.
  • Every claim with a source URL is checked against that page by an AI reader and the result is recorded: confirmed, partly confirmed, not supported, or page unreachable. A claim the page does not support stops counting toward any position until a later check confirms it; a claim whose page cannot be read still counts and says so.
  • Third-party claims outweigh first-party claims; profile fields are the weakest signal and are labelled as such.
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site; such a position is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" on the listing, the profile and the feed (evidence_basis: own_published) until an independent source documents the same kind of work. Its confidence is at most moderate.
  • In the ranking, who is speaking is decided by the source address: the vendor's own site and platforms where the vendor publishes about itself (platform partner directories and portals, case-study hosting sites, paid release wires) are the vendor's own word, not an independent source, whatever domain they sit on. Client reviews on a partner directory stay third-party.
  • On the profile and in its feed the rule is stricter: who is speaking is decided by who wrote the text. Every claim falls into one of four classes: independent (a client, the press, a rating written by a third party); linked to the agency (a person who worked at or through it, writing in the first person); a listing the agency writes (the platforms above, or another page retelling what the agency says); and the agency itself. Only the first class counts as independent there (section 18).
  • A claim counts for an intent only when the rubric's terms appear in the claim or its source. The rubric is published on the page.
  • Claims that only describe the company's location or history are not intent evidence.
  • Each claim is marked by whether it documents work (describes_work in the machine feed): case studies, projects, portfolio entries and client reviews do; service pages, pricing, positioning statements, review-platform profiles and employer reviews do not.
  • Claims from the same source count with diminishing weight: each further claim adds half as much as the one before it. Everything an agency says about itself, on any page, is one source; outside documents are told apart by the site that published them. The number of reviews on one platform, or of pages on an agency's own site, cannot carry a position.
  • Evidence documented on two or more different independent sites earns a small bonus over the same amount of evidence from one site.
  • Review platforms that compete with Vendar stay in the machine feed with their source URL, because a claim must be checkable, but pages do not name or link them; where other sources exist, they are listed first.

Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.

D5Dates and versions
Data as of
Nov 2, 2026
Newest evidence check
Nov 2, 2026
Feed generated
Nov 4, 2026
Ranking model
Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
Rubric
Mobile Backend and API Integration 2026.11
Update cadence
Fast signals, monthly: licence status, site alive, review rating and count, pricing pages, team page. Evidence, each base cycle: case studies, portfolio, services, client types, press and awards. Full re-verification, yearly: registry, address, ownership, every claim a rank rests on. Event-driven, within days: a vendor update, a buyer report, a dead link, a regulator record, a dispute.
Next evidence pass due by
Jan 31, 2027

Every date shown is a data date. A listing's updated date is the newest verification date among its ranked vendors and the evidence claims their ranks rest on; the same value appears in the page text, the structured data and the machine feed.

D6Known limits of the method

A position reflects documented work for the page's question, not the quality of an agency as such. Without a public case or a visible campaign the result of an agency's work cannot be known from outside. An agency with no public evidence is not worse: there is nothing to confirm it with, so it is listed below the ranking instead of being ranked low.

  • About 20 of 100 points rest on what the vendor says about itself without an outside check: years in business, team size, retention, prices.
  • The weights favour older, larger and local vendors: full marks at ten years and around 100 reviews, awards count toward market credibility, a vendor that works remotely gets 0.3 on geography, an undisclosed price gets 0.2.
  • The weights 30/25/15/10/10/5/5 are set by judgment and are not yet calibrated on client outcomes.
  • Reviews on directories are often collected by the agency itself.
  • The ranking decides who is speaking by the source address only: a person who worked at or through the agency writing on their own site, or a third-party page retelling what the agency says, still counts as third-party in a position. The profile and its feed already count them as the agency's word, so a position can show more third-party claims than the profile shows independent ones.
  • Market credibility counts recognition with a source on file, including recognition the vendor reports about itself.
  • Claims are checked by AI models, not by people. Code confirms that the quoted words are on the page; it cannot confirm that the page itself tells the truth. A case study on an agency's own site stays the agency's word even when the check confirms it.
  • Confidence is shown next to the score and does not change the order.
D7Machine-readable version

This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.

/ai/listings/development/mobile-development/new-york/mobile-backend-api-integration

Schema vendar.ai.decision.v1 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · generated Nov 4, 2026 · methodology /scoring