How many New York Mobile Development agencies have documented react native development work?

8 of the 44 Mobile Development agencies Vendar tracks in New York have at least one react native development claim on file under the published rubric, and 16 more from other cities join the ranking with documented react native development work; 0 of the 24 ranked have an outside source naming it, and 0 have one that describes the work rather than listing the service. The other 36 New York agencies are listed unranked until evidence is added.

Which New York react native development agency fits my type of business?

By the clients named in their documented react native development work: Dental, medical and wellness: New York App Devs (#2), Frenchy Digital (#7) and Disrupt Labs (#16); Shops, restaurants and retail: iQlance Solutions (#1). This comes from client reviews and case studies on file, not from the agencies' own positioning; the number after each name is its place in the ranking.

What does react native development cost in New York?

Among the ranked agencies that disclose a monthly floor, retainers start at $299/month and the median floor is $299/month. 2 of 24 ranked agencies disclose some pricing signal.

How is this list different from the New York Mobile Development page?

The New York Mobile Development page ranks every Mobile Development agency serving the city. This page keeps only the agencies with react native development evidence on file, scores them on the react native development query with the published model, and cites the claims behind every position. The model, its weights and the rubric are on the How we rank page.

When was this list updated?

Scores are recomputed from the profiles whenever a profile changes; the ranking model is version 2026.11.7.

DevelopmentMobile Development New YorkReact Native Development

New York / React Native Development

Best React Native Development Companies in New York (2026)

24 agencies are ranked on documented react native development work: 8 based in or serving New York and 16 from other cities, marked as such; 0 confirmed by an independent source; payment does not affect the order.

Data as of November 3, 2026 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · How this ranking works ↓

The answer in three lines

Compare top 3

1iQlance Solutions 54 · price not disclosed · clients 4.7/5 (10)4 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
2New York App Devs 49 · price not disclosed · clients 5.0/5 (2)6 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 6 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
3TechnBrains 48 · price not disclosed · clients 4.5/5 (28)3 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site

Budget in New York: disclosed monthly floors run from $299, median $299; 2 of 24 disclose a price.

24 ranked agencies

BudgetSort

ForPays

iQlance Solutions

New York, NY, USA · team 51-200 · since 2010

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.7/5 (10) Agency's own published cases

iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB, taken from idea to launch in 8 months in Dallas… (Agency's own words, iqlance.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

54/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

New York App Devs

New York, NY, USA

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed · clients 5.0/5 (2) Agency's own published cases

Senthora AI: …real-time voice tutoring, built for iOS and Android using React Native, with results of 70-90% lower cost and seconds response time. (Agency's own words, newyorkappdevs.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

49/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

TechnBrains

New York, NY, USA · since 2013

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.5/5 (28) Agency's own published cases

…cloud support for a hybrid iOS and Android app built with React Native on a LEMP stack with Laravel. (Agency's own words, technbrains.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

48/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

JumpGrowth

Dallas, TX, USA · team 51-200 · since 2018

serves New York from Dallas · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.4/5 (5) Agency's own published cases

The vendor's engineers built GunLox, an iOS and Android companion app for a smart firearm lock, using React Native, Node.js, NGINX, Angular and MongoDB.… (Agency's own words, jumpgrowth.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

47/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

BitsWits

Chicago, USA · team 100+ · since 2012

serves New York from Chicago · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.1/5 (20) Agency's own published cases

…and booking features across a technology stack including React Native, Flutter, Swift, and AWS, so the results are not attributable to a single service. (Agency's own words, bitswits.co)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

47/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

Simpalm

Chicago, IL, USA · team 51-200 · since 2009

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.9/5 (10) Agency's own published cases

Simpalm built a React Native cross-platform app for CASSA, an advisory organization, enabling surveys, family communication, and community forums on a… (Agency's own words, simpalm.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

46/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

Frenchy Digital

Los Angeles, CA, USA · since 2016

national coverage · Projects from $20,000 · clients 3.8/5 (2) Agency's own published cases

Frenchy Digital built GoRun, a community-driven React Native running app with live event tracking, social challenges, and gamification, achieving a 65% 30-day retention rate versus a 25% industry average on iOS and Androi… (Agency's own words, frenchydigital.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

46/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

Apptunix

New York, NY, USA · team 700+

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.2/5 (29) Agency's own published cases

Apptunix developed a multi-app ecosystem for Expo City Dubai, including 2 user-facing apps and 3 operational panels, built with native Android and iOS… (Agency's own words, apptunix.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

46/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

TechGropse

New York, USA

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed · clients 5.0/5 (2) Agency's own published cases

TechGropse built an AI-powered health insurance app for Saudi Enaya in Saudi Arabia using React Native, React, AWS, MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and… (Agency's own words, locations.techgropse.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

45/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

TekRevol

New York, USA · team 50+ · since 2018

HQ in New York · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.0/5 (37) Agency's own published cases

…access, and user-friendly reporting features, built in React Native with Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). (Agency's own words, tekrevol.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

45/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

135 more agencies considered without externally confirmed react native development work, 36 of them serving New York

This is an absence of evidence, not a quality rating.

One sourced claim moves an agency into the ranking.

No react native development claim on file yet. (106)

Only Vendar profile tags name react native development; no outside source on file yet. (28)

Sources on file say the vendor offers react native development; no case study or client review documents the work yet. (1)

Bolder Appsprice n/a

Frequently asked questions (6)

How many New York Mobile Development agencies have documented react native development work?: 8 of the 44 Mobile Development agencies Vendar tracks in New York have at least one react native development claim on file under the published rubric, and 16 more from other cities join the ranking with documented react native development work; 0 of the 24 ranked have an outside source naming it, and 0 have one that describes the work rather than listing the service. The other 36 New York agencies are listed unranked until evidence is added.
Which New York react native development agency fits my type of business?: By the clients named in their documented react native development work: Dental, medical and wellness: New York App Devs (#2), Frenchy Digital (#7) and Disrupt Labs (#16); Shops, restaurants and retail: iQlance Solutions (#1). This comes from client reviews and case studies on file, not from the agencies' own positioning; the number after each name is its place in the ranking.
What does react native development cost in New York?: Among the ranked agencies that disclose a monthly floor, retainers start at $299/month and the median floor is $299/month. 2 of 24 ranked agencies disclose some pricing signal.
Which of them are verified?: 0 of 24 ranked agencies are verified. Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.
How is this list different from the New York Mobile Development page?: The New York Mobile Development page ranks every Mobile Development agency serving the city. This page keeps only the agencies with react native development evidence on file, scores them on the react native development query with the published model, and cites the claims behind every position. The model, its weights and the rubric are on the How we rank page.
When was this list updated?: Scores are recomputed from the profiles whenever a profile changes; the ranking model is version 2026.11.7.

Get my shortlist Machine-readable version All details ↓

All detailsThe full table, the rubric, the rules and the limits: the same data the machine feed serves for this ranking.Open ↓

D1Full ranking table24 ranked · click a column to sort

#	Agency	Score	Evid./30	Fit/25	Capab./15	Reliab./10	Transp./10	Reput./5	Cred./5	Pen.	Conf.	Claims	Verified
1	iQlance Solutions	54	15	19	9.6	7.2	2.5	2.4	0	-2	0.8	4/0	Not verified
2	New York App Devs	49	17.5	19	10.5	3	0	1.2	0	-2	0.8	6/0	Not verified
3	TechnBrains	48	14	15.5	8.7	7.2	0	3.3	1.3	-2	0.8	3/0	Not verified
4	JumpGrowth	47	15.9	12.4	10.2	6	2.5	1.7	0	-2	0.8	7/0	Not verified
5	BitsWits	47	12	15.9	8.5	7.2	2.5	2.7	0	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
6	Simpalm	46	15.5	10.3	8.2	7.2	2.5	2.6	1.3	-2	0.8	3/0	Not verified
7	Frenchy Digital	46	13	13.3	8.5	7.2	5	0.9	0	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
8	Apptunix	46	11.2	19	8.9	3	2.5	3.1	0	-2	0.8	4/0	Not verified
9	TechGropse	45	12	19	10	3	0	1.2	1.3	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
10	TekRevol	45	8	19	7.9	6	2.5	3.2	0	-2	0.8	1/0	Not verified
11	Softaims	44	16.5	6.8	12.2	3	2.5	3.4	1.3	-2	0.8	4/0	Not verified
12	Appluex	44	12	16.2	8.6	3	5	0	1.3	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
13	AppMakersLA	43	12	10.3	8.4	7.2	2.5	4.8	0	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
14	Appingine	42	13.5	10.3	8	7.2	2.5	1.3	1.3	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
15	KodersPedia	41	15.8	6.8	14.1	3	0	3.2	0	-2	0.8	6/0	Not verified
16	Disrupt Labs	38	15.5	6.8	15	6	0	0	0	-5	0.8	5/0	Not verified
17	AppVerticals	38	13	10.3	8.4	3	0	4.8	0	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
18	Digipie Technologies	37	8	10.3	8	6.6	2.5	2.7	1.3	-2	0.8	1/0	Not verified
19	Sytepoint	36	8	10.3	8.4	7.2	2.5	0	1.3	-2	0.8	1/0	Not verified
20	Go Tech Solutions	35	14	10.3	8.9	3	0	0.8	0	-2	0.8	3/0	Not verified
21	Vincit	34	12	6.8	8.1	3	0	1.9	3.8	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
22	Software Orca	31	12	6.8	8	3	0	2.8	0	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
23	Marotino	29	8	10.3	8	3	2.5	1.9	0	-5	0.8	1/0	Not verified
24	Los Angeles App Devs	24	8	6.8	11.3	3	0	0	0	-5	0.8	1/0	Not verified

Pool 44 · ranked 24 · unranked 135 (28 with profile tags only) · verified 0 · pricing disclosed 2 · case studies on file 0 · an outside source names the work 0 · an outside document describes it 0

Claims: claims for this need in the feed / of them from a third party. Confidence is the number behind the High, Moderate and Lower labels; it never changes the order.

D1Breakdown per agencyPoints, facts, claims with weights and reviews behind every position

#1 iQlance Solutions54/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 36 claims on file

Evidence for this query	15/30	0.5	4 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB, taken from… (iqlance.com, claimed); iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app; the page lists this project in Dallas, USA with an 8 months… (iqlance.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	19/25	0.76	Headquartered in New York (New York, NY, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth	9.6/15	0.639	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 4 of 36 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	7.2/10	0.72	In business since 2010; Retention not documented
Transparency	2.5/10	0.25	Pricing not disclosed; Team size 51-200; Process not documented
Reputation	2.4/5	0.489	10 third-party reviews at 4.7
Market credibility	0/5	0	No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB, taken from idea to launch in 8 months in Dallas, USA.
Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app; the page lists this project in Dallas, USA with an 8 months idea-to-launch timeline, built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB.
Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026
iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app, for a client in Dallas, USA, built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS and Mongo DB and launched 8 months after the initial idea.
Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026
iQlance Solutions built a restaurant app for a client in Houston, USA, using .Net, SQL Server and React Native, launched 10 weeks after the initial idea.
Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 7 reviews; Trustpilot 4 from 3 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#2 New York App Devs49/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 38 claims on file

Evidence for this query	17.5/30	0.583	6 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 6 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; The page presents a case study for Senthora AI, an EdTech app described as real-time voice tutoring, built for iOS and Android using React… (newyorkappdevs.com, claimed); New York App Devs built Teacher AI, an AI tutor React Native app for iOS and Android, for an EdTech client; the page states it reached… (newyorkappdevs.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	19/25	0.76	Headquartered in New York (New York, NY, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names healthcare clients
Capability depth	10.5/15	0.6970000000000001	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 6 of 38 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	3/10	0.3	Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency	0/10	0	Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation	1.2/5	0.239	2 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility	0/5	0	No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

The page presents a case study for Senthora AI, an EdTech app described as real-time voice tutoring, built for iOS and Android using React Native, with results of 70-90% lower cost and seconds response time.
Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
New York App Devs built Teacher AI, an AI tutor React Native app for iOS and Android, for an EdTech client; the page states it reached 50,000+ users across 30+ countries and $5M+ in client revenue.
Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
New York App Devs documents a React Native app built for Teacher AI, reporting 50,000+ users across 30+ countries and $5M+ in client revenue.
Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026
New York App Devs built Decima, a React Native healthcare app with HIPAA-compliant architecture and 40+ Apple Health biomarkers synced.
Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
The page states the vendor built Decima, a voice AI health coaching app on iOS with React Native, to HIPAA-compliant architecture standards.
Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
New York App Devs says it built Decima, a voice AI health coaching app on iOS with React Native, to HIPAA-compliant architecture standards from day one.
Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 2 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#3 TechnBrains48/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 48 claims on file

Evidence for this query	14/30	0.467	3 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; TechnBrains built the Whitetail Almanac hunting app for Hunter's Edge, providing design and prototyping, development, maintenance, and… (technbrains.com, claimed); The QPON case study lists React Native, React JS, and Node JS as the technology used. (technbrains.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	15.5/25	0.62	Headquartered in New York (New York, NY, USA); Pricing not disclosed
Capability depth	8.7/15	0.578	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 3 of 48 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	7.2/10	0.72	In business since 2013; Retention not documented
Transparency	0/10	0	Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation	3.3/5	0.6579999999999999	28 third-party reviews at 4.5
Market credibility	1.3/5	0.25	1 recognition with a source on file: an award per truefirms.co; Sources: truefirms.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

TechnBrains built the Whitetail Almanac hunting app for Hunter's Edge, providing design and prototyping, development, maintenance, and cloud support for a hybrid iOS and Android app built with React Native on a LEMP stack with Laravel.
Agency's own words · technbrains.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
The QPON case study lists React Native, React JS, and Node JS as the technology used.
Agency's own words · technbrains.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
The BUILT BY DETERMINATION app was built on React, React Native.NET and Azure, with integrations for Agora, Sandgird, Google API and Stripe.
Agency's own words · technbrains.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.7 from 13 reviews; Trustpilot 4.4 from 15 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#4 JumpGrowth47/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · serves the city from Dallas, TX, USA · price not disclosed · 49 claims on file

Evidence for this query	15.9/30	0.529	7 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 7 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; The vendor's engineers built GunLox, an iOS and Android companion app for a smart firearm lock, using React Native, Node.js, NGINX… (jumpgrowth.com, claimed); The vendor built Greenaider, a web carbon footprint calculator that lets individuals and organizations measure, track and reduce their… (jumpgrowth.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	12.4/25	0.495	Lists New York as a service region; headquartered in Dallas, TX, USA; Pricing not disclosed
Capability depth	10.2/15	0.679	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 7 of 49 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	6/10	0.6	In business since 2018; Retention not documented
Transparency	2.5/10	0.25	Pricing not disclosed; Team size 51-200; Process not documented
Reputation	1.7/5	0.342	5 third-party reviews at 4.4
Market credibility	0/5	0	No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

The vendor's engineers built GunLox, an iOS and Android companion app for a smart firearm lock, using React Native, Node.js, NGINX, Angular and MongoDB. The app provides Bluetooth-enabled locking, firearm tracking, usage logs and remote access.
Agency's own words · jumpgrowth.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
The vendor built Greenaider, a web carbon footprint calculator that lets individuals and organizations measure, track and reduce their carbon footprint through goal-setting and green challenges, using React Native, Node.js, Angular, NGINX and MongoDB.
Agency's own words · jumpgrowth.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
The Greenaider build used one React Native codebase for its mobile apps, so every release reaches iOS and Android together.
Agency's own words · jumpgrowth.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
The vendor built Ship It Pro, an iOS and Android B2B load planning app with 3D interactive load diagrams and collaborative communication features, using React Native, Node.js, Angular, NGINX and MongoDB.
Agency's own words · jumpgrowth.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
The vendor built VowTimer, an iOS and Android app that lets wedding guests connect before the ceremony and bet on how long the ceremony will take, using React Native, Node.js, Angular, NGINX and MongoDB.
Agency's own words · jumpgrowth.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
The vendor built Penn.AI, an iOS and Android AI-powered mobile application that transcribes voice meetings into speech-to-text notes in real time, using React Native, Node.js and MongoDB.
Agency's own words · jumpgrowth.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
JumpGrowth staffed a team that built VowTimer, a cross-platform wedding guest app for iOS and Android using React Native, with a Node.js backend, MongoDB, and an Angular admin panel.
Agency's own words · jumpgrowth.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 2 reviews; Trustpilot 4 from 3 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#5 BitsWits47/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · serves the city from Chicago, USA · price not disclosed · 38 claims on file

Evidence for this query	12/30	0.4	2 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; BitsWits describes building VIFTY, a platform connecting service providers with consumers, as a multifaceted mobile app. The work combined… (bitswits.co, claimed); BitsWits built Soul Scribe, a digital diary app combining journaling with social interaction, with features including post management… (bitswits.co, claimed)
Fit to this query	15.9/25	0.635	Lists New York as a service region; headquartered in Chicago, USA; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth	8.5/15	0.5660000000000001	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 38 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	7.2/10	0.72	In business since 2012; Retention not documented
Transparency	2.5/10	0.25	Pricing not disclosed; Team size 100+; Process not documented
Reputation	2.7/5	0.542	20 third-party reviews at 4.1
Market credibility	0/5	0	No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

BitsWits describes building VIFTY, a platform connecting service providers with consumers, as a multifaceted mobile app. The work combined app development with social and booking features across a technology stack including React Native, Flutter, Swift, and AWS, so the results are not attributable to a single service.
Agency's own words · bitswits.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
BitsWits built Soul Scribe, a digital diary app combining journaling with social interaction, with features including post management, in-app messaging, groups management, and privacy controls. The page lists technologies including React Native, Flutter, Swift, and AWS, so the specific platform used for the build is not attributable to one framework.
Agency's own words · bitswits.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 1 reviews; Trustpilot 4 from 19 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#6 Simpalm46/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 76 claims on file

Evidence for this query	15.5/30	0.517	3 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Simpalm built a React Native cross-platform app for CASSA, an advisory organization, enabling surveys, family communication, and community… (simpalm.com, claimed); Simpalm built a cross-platform React Native app for CASSA, an advisory organization, enabling surveys, family communication, and community… (simpalm.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	10.3/25	0.41	Serves New York from Chicago, IL, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth	8.2/15	0.5489999999999999	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 3 of 76 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	7.2/10	0.72	In business since 2009; Retention not documented
Transparency	2.5/10	0.25	Pricing not disclosed; Team size 51-200; Process not documented
Reputation	2.6/5	0.51	10 third-party reviews at 4.9
Market credibility	1.3/5	0.25	1 recognition with a source on file: a press mention per selectedfirms.co; Sources: selectedfirms.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Simpalm built a React Native cross-platform app for CASSA, an advisory organization, enabling surveys, family communication, and community forums on a single platform. 100+ families used the app within the first month of launch, and month-on-month user growth increased by 30%.
Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026
Simpalm built a cross-platform React Native app for CASSA, an advisory organization, enabling surveys, family communication, and community forums on Android and iOS. 100+ families used the app within the first month of launch, and month-on-month user growth increased by 30%.
Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026
Simpalm built Android and iOS apps for Collabri, a marketplace connecting service seekers and providers, using React Native. More than 200K jobs were completed in the MVP launch, and total jobs worth $10 million or more have been completed on the apps.
Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 9 reviews; Trustpilot 3.7 from 1 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#7 Frenchy Digital46/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · Projects from $20,000 · projects from $20,000 · 39 claims on file

Evidence for this query	13/30	0.433	2 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Frenchy Digital built GoRun, a community-driven React Native running app with live event tracking, social challenges, and gamification… (frenchydigital.com, claimed); Frenchy Digital built a React Native app for CGSA Mental Health Clinic, a Los Angeles mental health clinic, with end-to-end encryption… (frenchydigital.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	13.3/25	0.53	Serves New York from Los Angeles, CA, USA; no local office on file; Projects from $20,000; no monthly floor disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth	8.5/15	0.564	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 39 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	7.2/10	0.72	In business since 2016; Retention not documented
Transparency	5/10	0.5	Pricing disclosed (Projects from $20,000); Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation	0.9/5	0.181	2 third-party reviews at 3.8
Market credibility	0/5	0	No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

Frenchy Digital built GoRun, a community-driven React Native running app with live event tracking, social challenges, and gamification, achieving a 65% 30-day retention rate versus a 25% industry average on iOS and Android.
Agency's own words · frenchydigital.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 3, 2026
Frenchy Digital built a React Native app for CGSA Mental Health Clinic, a Los Angeles mental health clinic, with end-to-end encryption, secure messaging, teletherapy integration, and comprehensive patient management features.
Agency's own words · frenchydigital.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 3, 2026

#8 Apptunix46/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 52 claims on file

Evidence for this query	11.2/30	0.375	4 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Apptunix developed a multi-app ecosystem for Expo City Dubai, including 2 user-facing apps and 3 operational panels, built with native… (apptunix.com, claimed); The apps for Expo City Eats were natively built and connected through a robust backend utilizing Node.js and MongoDB. (apptunix.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	19/25	0.76	Headquartered in New York (New York, NY, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names enterprise clients
Capability depth	8.9/15	0.596	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 4 of 52 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	3/10	0.3	Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency	2.5/10	0.25	Pricing not disclosed; Team size 700+; Process not documented
Reputation	3.1/5	0.62	29 third-party reviews at 4.2
Market credibility	0/5	0	No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Apptunix developed a multi-app ecosystem for Expo City Dubai, including 2 user-facing apps and 3 operational panels, built with native Android and iOS capabilities and a real-time delivery flow.
Agency's own words · apptunix.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
The apps for Expo City Eats were natively built and connected through a robust backend utilizing Node.js and MongoDB.
Agency's own words · apptunix.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
The Expo City Eats app achieved an App Rating of 4.5 and surpassed 10K downloads.
Agency's own words · apptunix.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
The platform developed for Expo City Dubai now supports additional zones, vendors, and multiple user categories without structural changes.
Agency's own words · apptunix.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 4 reviews; Trustpilot 4.1 from 25 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#9 TechGropse45/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 15 claims on file

Evidence for this query	12/30	0.4	2 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; TechGropse built an AI-powered health insurance app for Saudi Enaya in Saudi Arabia using React Native, React, AWS, MySQL, PostgreSQL… (locations.techgropse.com, claimed); TechGropse developed an online appointment booking app with secure in-app messaging for King Khalid (Saudi Arabia, healthcare), using… (locations.techgropse.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	19/25	0.76	Headquartered in New York (New York, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth	10/15	0.667	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 15 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	3/10	0.3	Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency	0/10	0	Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation	1.2/5	0.239	2 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility	1.3/5	0.25	1 recognition with a source on file: a press mention per rightfirms.co; Sources: rightfirms.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

TechGropse built an AI-powered health insurance app for Saudi Enaya in Saudi Arabia using React Native, React, AWS, MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and Node.js. The stated results were increased accessibility, faster claims processing, boosted trust in digital services, and improved insurance awareness.
Agency's own words · locations.techgropse.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
TechGropse developed an online appointment booking app with secure in-app messaging for King Khalid (Saudi Arabia, healthcare), using React Native for mobile.NET for backend, SQL Server for database, and Azure for hosting.
Agency's own words · locations.techgropse.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 2 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#10 TekRevol45/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 50 claims on file

Evidence for this query	8/30	0.267	1 react native development claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; TekRevol developed a mobile application for Kinder Morgan that delivered real-time data, enhanced role-based access, and user-friendly… (tekrevol.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	19/25	0.76	Headquartered in New York (New York, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth	7.9/15	0.525	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 1 of 50 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	6/10	0.6	In business since 2018; Retention not documented
Transparency	2.5/10	0.25	Pricing not disclosed; Team size 50+; Process not documented
Reputation	3.2/5	0.632	37 third-party reviews at 4.0
Market credibility	0/5	0	No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

TekRevol developed a mobile application for Kinder Morgan that delivered real-time data, enhanced role-based access, and user-friendly reporting features, built in React Native with Role-Based Access Control (RBAC).
Agency's own words · tekrevol.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.5 from 11 reviews; Trustpilot 3.8 from 26 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Positions 11 to 24: the same breakdown is on each agency's profile, linked from the table above, and in the machine-readable version below.

D2What counts as evidence for this questionRubric 2026.11

A claim counts as React Native evidence when a source on file names an app the company built, rebuilt or maintains in React Native or Expo, ideally with the client and the platforms it shipped on. A technology listed on the company's services page without a project does not count.

Terms that count:: react native, expo
Minimum to be ranked:: 1 claim on file under this rubric, of which 1 from a source outside Vendar.
Budget band:: no budget band for this question

In plain words: a case counts when it names react native development work and where it was published can be checked.

D3Eligibility and orderWho is admitted, how ties break, what payment does

Ranked vendors have at least 1 claim on file that supports react native development under the published rubric, of which at least 1 comes from a source outside Vendar; the rest are listed unranked.

The vendor lists the page's service on its profile.
The vendor serves the page's market: headquarters or a listed service region in the city. When a need page has fewer than ten ranked vendors from the city, agencies from other cities join it only if they are headquartered in the same state or have published work (a case study, a project, a client review) that names the city or its state. A line saying a company serves the whole country is not enough. They are ranked by the same score, geography counts 0.3 for them, and each position says where the agency works from. Mobile development is bought remotely, so its city pages take agencies from anywhere in the United States under the same condition: documented work for the need. The same holds for SEO needs bought remotely: international, enterprise, consulting, recovery, marketplaces, startups, B2B SaaS, ecommerce, AI search visibility, audits, technical and content-led SEO. Local SEO, small business, lead generation and high-ticket services stay with agencies from the city and its state.
A need page that still has fewer than ten ranked agencies after that is filled from the city's own agencies whose sources say they offer the need but document no project for it yet. They always stand below every agency with documented work, are labelled "Offers this service; no documented project on file yet", carry lower confidence, and do not count toward the threshold that opens a page to search engines.
For an intent page, at least one claim on file supports the intent under the page's rubric, and at least one of those claims comes from a source outside Vendar. Our own service listings and profile tags describe the intent but document nothing, so they add weight to a vendor that already has outside evidence and never earn a rank on their own. Vendors without outside evidence appear below the ranking, unranked, never padded into it.
For an intent page, at least one of those claims documents work the vendor has done: a case study, a project or portfolio entry, or a client review. Service pages, price lists, positioning statements and directory listings say what a vendor offers, not what it did; they add weight to a vendor that already has documented work and never earn a documented position. They can only fill a page that is short of ten, below every documented position and labelled as such (see below).
A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site. It is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" until an independent source documents the same kind of work.
Filtered views (an entry price, a pricing model, a team size) are not rankings of their own: they show agencies ranked for at least one need in the city, each with the score of its best need, and keep only those that meet the condition. An agency that does not publish the fact is listed below with the reason.
Draft and needs-data profiles are never listed.
Rank order is the score, highest first. Ties break on evidence points, then on the number of third-party claims, then alphabetically.
There is no hidden ordering: no hand-curated slug lists and no paid boost in the sort on any listing.
If an editor overrides a position, the position is labelled as an editorial placement with a written reason and ordering_basis set to editorial. No such placements exist on evidence-ranked pages today.
Every ranked position explains itself from its score components and cites the claims behind them, with their sources.
Sort: score_out_of_100, highest first; ties break on evidence points, then third-party claim count, then name.
Payment: Paid visibility never changes the order of a listing.
Top-list threshold: An intent page is offered to search engines when its ranked list has at least five evidence-backed vendors (three when the city has fewer than twenty vendors for the service). Only agencies from the city itself (headquarters or a listed service region) with documented work count toward it: agencies filled in from other cities and agencies that only offer the need do not. A page whose list rests mostly on agencies from other cities is titled “agencies serving” the city instead of “best agencies in” it, says how many are local, stays on the city page and in its feed, and is kept out of search engines until enough local agencies document the work; otherwise the same national list would stand behind six city pages. Below the threshold even with outside agencies the page stays published with noindex, keeps its URL, links and feed, and is left out of the city page's list of rankings. A page whose top ten repeats 70% or more of another need's top ten in the same city, or has the same top three, also stays noindex while the stronger of the two is offered; it opens when the lists differ. The same holds across cities: of the pages for one need whose top tens share 70% or more, only the one with the most local agencies is offered to search engines.

Weights: Evidence for this query 30 · Fit to this query 25 · Capability depth 15 · Reliability 10 · Transparency 10 · Reputation 5 · Market credibility 5. Penalties: Profile flagged for review -5 · Evidence not re-checked in 18 months -5 · No independent source on file -3 · Profile below decision-ready status -2.

D4How claims are counted

Paid agency directories that sell placement are not a source. Their reviews are not cited, never support a position and do not count toward reputation; a profile may show how many reviews such directories hold as one unnamed figure, for context only. Ratings come from open review platforms: Google, Trustpilot and BBB.
Provenance is recorded per claim: third_party, first_party, internal (a Vendar profile field) or unknown.
Verification status is recorded per claim: verified, claimed, internal_signal or unverified.
Every record on file has a role: a claim states a fact; a source reference is a link without a statement (an official site, a directory profile); a research note is Vendar's own remark. Only claims count as evidence. A source reference never earns weight, however its title reads, and a research note never reaches a page or a feed.
Every claim with a source URL is checked against that page by an AI reader and the result is recorded: confirmed, partly confirmed, not supported, or page unreachable. A claim the page does not support stops counting toward any position until a later check confirms it; a claim whose page cannot be read still counts and says so.
Third-party claims outweigh first-party claims; profile fields are the weakest signal and are labelled as such.
A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site; such a position is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" on the listing, the profile and the feed (evidence_basis: own_published) until an independent source documents the same kind of work. Its confidence is at most moderate.
In the ranking, who is speaking is decided by the source address: the vendor's own site and platforms where the vendor publishes about itself (platform partner directories and portals, case-study hosting sites, paid release wires) are the vendor's own word, not an independent source, whatever domain they sit on. Client reviews on a partner directory stay third-party.
On the profile and in its feed the rule is stricter: who is speaking is decided by who wrote the text. Every claim falls into one of four classes: independent (a client, the press, a rating written by a third party); linked to the agency (a person who worked at or through it, writing in the first person); a listing the agency writes (the platforms above, or another page retelling what the agency says); and the agency itself. Only the first class counts as independent there (section 18).
A claim counts for an intent only when the rubric's terms appear in the claim or its source. The rubric is published on the page.
Claims that only describe the company's location or history are not intent evidence.
Each claim is marked by whether it documents work (describes_work in the machine feed): case studies, projects, portfolio entries and client reviews do; service pages, pricing, positioning statements, review-platform profiles and employer reviews do not.
Claims from the same source count with diminishing weight: each further claim adds half as much as the one before it. Everything an agency says about itself, on any page, is one source; outside documents are told apart by the site that published them. The number of reviews on one platform, or of pages on an agency's own site, cannot carry a position.
Evidence documented on two or more different independent sites earns a small bonus over the same amount of evidence from one site.
Review platforms that compete with Vendar stay in the machine feed with their source URL, because a claim must be checkable, but pages do not name or link them; where other sources exist, they are listed first.

Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.

D5Dates and versions

Data as of: Nov 3, 2026
Newest evidence check: Nov 3, 2026
Feed generated: Nov 4, 2026
Ranking model: Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
Rubric: React Native Development 2026.11
Update cadence: Fast signals, monthly: licence status, site alive, review rating and count, pricing pages, team page. Evidence, each base cycle: case studies, portfolio, services, client types, press and awards. Full re-verification, yearly: registry, address, ownership, every claim a rank rests on. Event-driven, within days: a vendor update, a buyer report, a dead link, a regulator record, a dispute.
Next evidence pass due by: Feb 1, 2027

Every date shown is a data date. A listing's updated date is the newest verification date among its ranked vendors and the evidence claims their ranks rest on; the same value appears in the page text, the structured data and the machine feed.

D6Known limits of the method

A position reflects documented work for the page's question, not the quality of an agency as such. Without a public case or a visible campaign the result of an agency's work cannot be known from outside. An agency with no public evidence is not worse: there is nothing to confirm it with, so it is listed below the ranking instead of being ranked low.

About 20 of 100 points rest on what the vendor says about itself without an outside check: years in business, team size, retention, prices.
The weights favour older, larger and local vendors: full marks at ten years and around 100 reviews, awards count toward market credibility, a vendor that works remotely gets 0.3 on geography, an undisclosed price gets 0.2.
The weights 30/25/15/10/10/5/5 are set by judgment and are not yet calibrated on client outcomes.
Reviews on directories are often collected by the agency itself.
The ranking decides who is speaking by the source address only: a person who worked at or through the agency writing on their own site, or a third-party page retelling what the agency says, still counts as third-party in a position. The profile and its feed already count them as the agency's word, so a position can show more third-party claims than the profile shows independent ones.
Market credibility counts recognition with a source on file, including recognition the vendor reports about itself.
Claims are checked by AI models, not by people. Code confirms that the quoted words are on the page; it cannot confirm that the page itself tells the truth. A case study on an agency's own site stays the agency's word even when the check confirms it.
Confidence is shown next to the score and does not change the order.

D7Machine-readable version

This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.

/ai/listings/development/mobile-development/new-york/react-native-development

Schema vendar.ai.decision.v1 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · generated Nov 4, 2026 · methodology /scoring

Other New York Mobile Development scenarios

All Mobile Development iOS App Development Android App Development Flutter Development Mobile MVP Development Mobile App Modernization Mobile Backend and API Integration

React Native Development in other cities

Los Angeles Chicago Miami Houston