Ranks in the top three, and most of its claims match the sources they cite, but the record lacks one thing a decision needs; the agency can add it through the claim form, and the verdict updates with the data. 4 of its 39 documented work claims come from an independent source.
Missing: a published price with a unit (monthly floor, project minimum or hourly rate). Correct the data about this company
Best position #1 iOS App Development in Los Angeles, of 31 · also in 27 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google5.0/580 reviews as of Nov 3, 2026Trustpilot4.4/511 reviews- 23% written in the last 12 months
- 2% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 98% of Google reviews answered
Clients most often value attentive communication, collaborative planning and design, and useful technical research, with many describing timely delivery. One Google reviewer reports serious problems with charges, app-store approval, slow responses, and code handover; otherwise, the reviews are overwhelmingly positive, though several describe planning rather than a finished product.More
- Collaborative discovery, research, and tailored guidance27
- Clear, responsive communication and attentive support12
- Timely delivery and reliable project management11
- Quality of design, software, and functional deliverables9
- Reasonable cost and budget-aware recommendations5
“They asked all the right questions and helped us understand what was possible.”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“their communication was clear, consistent, and timely”
“every milestone met on time”
“a professional, functional, and visually stunning website”
“App Makers LA was BY FAR the most reasonable in cost.”
- Unwanted charges and limited approval1
- Slow responses and code handover1
“Charged for work we specifically told them not to do”
Show 1 more quoteHide quotes
“Extremely slow responses. Took weeks to get then to turn over our code”
Show 2 more resultsHide results
- R&D, feasibility, and technical planning17
- App development, fixing, and resubmission11
- Custom software, portals, CRM, and automation11
- Wireframing, design, and product strategy6
- Website design and development4
- Businesses and professional services
- Technology, software, and AI organizations
- Specialized firms and service providers
- Education and student organizations
- Events, marketplaces, and consumer apps
- Healthcare and social services
Show 6 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“Revamped iPermit's portal and built CRM capabilities to improve customer communication and operational efficiency. The client described the platform as scalable and praised the project team's ability to identify essential requirements and keep the project moving.”
“AppMakers USA transformed an existing intimacy-app concept into a launch-ready mobile product. The client reported successful App Store and Google Play acceptance, a smooth launch and close communication with the engineering team throughout development.”
“App Makers LA is easy to work with and keeps everyone aligned throughout the project. They offer valuable suggestions and improvements without being pushy or requiring unnecessary changes. Test users have responded positively to the app, praising its appealing design, smooth functionality, and overall user experience.”
“Benny's Educational Toys, based in New Jersey, partnered with AppMakersLA to develop a cutting-edge marketplace app for our Jewish educational toys. Since the launch of the app, we've seen a significant 250% increase in user engagement, leading to a substantial boost in sales and revenue.”
“Not only did they bring our vision to life, but they also helped us achieve a 150% increase in user engagement within the first three months of launch.”
“AppMakers USA’s work helped the client improve their platform’s functionality and design. The team delivered detailed wireframes, a product roadmap, and technical recommendations. AppMakers USA delivered work on time and adjusted their recommendations based on the client’s feedback.”
- Your business matches the client types on file (enterprises, ecommerce brands, SaaS companies) and the industries on file (fintech, healthcare, education).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: R&D, feasibility, and technical planning (17 of 49 mentions); App development, fixing, and resubmission (11).
- Read the criticism first: "Unwanted charges and limited approval" (1 of 56 reviews read).
- Read the criticism first: "Slow responses and code handover" (1 of 56 reviews read).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
- Little outside recognition on file: fewer than two awards, certifications or press mentions with a source.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for an iOS App Development case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask who will do the work day to day and whether any of it is outsourced.
AppMakersLA leads this ranking. The next two places:
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for AppMakersLA.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#1 iOS App Development in Los Angeles: 64/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 23.5 | 78% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 19 | 76% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 9.3 | 62% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 7.2 | 72% |
|
| Transparency | 10 | 2.5 | 25% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 4.8 | 96% |
|
| Market credibilityweakest | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed20 of 41 on file · 4 of 39 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 41 claims on file: independent source 6 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 35. Independent share of work claims: 10.3%. 12 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: iOS App Development 4 · Android App Development 3 · Mobile MVP Development 4 · Mobile App Modernization 2 · React Native Development 2 · Mobile Backend and API Integration 1. The full ledger of 41 is on the proof page.
AppMakers USA transformed an existing intimacy-app concept into a launch-ready mobile product for Moon Me Lover. The client reported successful App Store and Google Play acceptance and a smooth launch.
Independent sourceselectedfirms.coverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes work13-08-2026iOS App DevelopmentAndroid App DevelopmentQuote from the source page
AppMakers USA transformed an existing intimacy-app concept into a launch-ready mobile product. The client reported successful App Store and Google Play acceptance, a smooth launch and close communication with the engineering team throughout development.
Larson Packaging Company says AppMakersLA built its dating app targeting rugby players and that the app achieved a 150% increase in user engagement within the first three months of launch.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workwithin the first three months of launchQuote from the source page
Not only did they bring our vision to life, but they also helped us achieve a 150% increase in user engagement within the first three months of launch.
The ASL Flurry engagement is listed as a build plus a partnership of more than two years, with the app available on iOS, Android, and web.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes work2+ years, ongoingQuote from the source page
Engagement Build + 2+ year partnership
AppMakers shipped Number Hive as native iOS and Android apps alongside a web build; the product later consolidated onto its web platform, which serves 700,000+ students with no install required.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workiOS App DevelopmentAndroid App DevelopmentQuote from the source page
AppMakers shipped Number Hive as native iOS and Android apps alongside the web build. As classroom adoption grew, where shared browsers and Chromebooks dominate, the product consolidated onto its web platform, now live and free at play.numberhive.org for 700,000+ students, with no install required.
AppMakers shipped Number Hive as native iOS and Android apps alongside a web build.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workiOS App DevelopmentAndroid App DevelopmentQuote from the source page
AppMakers shipped Number Hive as native iOS and Android apps alongside the web build.
AppMakers USA built an offline-first medical iPad app for Cybionex and added SQLCipher encryption at the native adapter layer by forking WatermelonDB. The fork was open-sourced.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workiOS App DevelopmentQuote from the source page
We built this offline-first using WatermelonDB for the on-device SQL layer. WatermelonDB has no encryption support, and a medical app needs at-rest encryption on device. Rather than swap libraries and lose the sync engine, we forked WatermelonDB and patched in SQLCipher at the native adapter layer. The fork is open-sourced.
App Makers USA's product analysis helped a client refine their app concept and implement improvements, with the team adhering to deadlines and maintaining open communication.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workMobile MVP DevelopmentQuote from the source page
Thanks to App Makers USA’s product analysis, the client managed to refine their app concept and implement improvements. The team managed the project very well, they adhered to deadlines, maintained open communication, and promptly responded to queries and concerns.
App Makers USA delivered a comprehensive roadmap for Casa Tamarindo, adhering to deadlines and responding to feedback throughout the project.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workMobile MVP DevelopmentQuote from the source page
App Makers USA delivered a comprehensive roadmap that helped the client stay ahead in a competitive market. The team adhered to deadlines, responded to feedback, and exhibited flexibility throughout the project.
App Makers USA provided UI streamlining suggestions, feature prioritization, and a comprehensive roadmap with clear milestones for a site rebuild for Quantum Metric.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workMobile MVP DevelopmentMobile App ModernizationQuote from the source page
App Makers USA offered insightful suggestions for streamlining the site's UI, helped prioritize key features for the rebuild, and delivered a comprehensive roadmap with clear milestones.
App Makers USA delivered a clear plan for building a portal for a healthcare provider, delivering on time with strong project management.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workMobile MVP DevelopmentQuote from the source page
App Makers USA delivered a clear plan for building the portal and provided valuable insights. The team's project management was great; they delivered on time, were incredibly attentive, and knew how to prioritize.
Benny's Educational Toys says AppMakersLA developed a marketplace app for its Jewish educational toys, and that since launch it has seen a 250% increase in user engagement along with a boost in sales and revenue.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Benny's Educational Toys, based in New Jersey, partnered with AppMakersLA to develop a cutting-edge marketplace app for our Jewish educational toys. Since the launch of the app, we've seen a significant 250% increase in user engagement, leading to a substantial boost in sales and revenue.
AppMakers USA started ShiftPass as an MVP engagement, and it grew into a marketplace connecting gig workers with businesses that need staff.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
ShiftPass started as an MVP engagement and grew into a marketplace connecting gig workers with businesses that need staff.
AppMakers USA built the ASL Flurry American Sign Language learning app for iOS, Android, and web from a single React Native Web codebase, with shared UI and business logic and thin native adapters per platform.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workReact Native DevelopmentQuote from the source page
We chose React Native Web because it lets us write components once and target iOS, Android, and the browser from a single repo.
AppMakers USA built ASL Flurry as a React Native app running on iOS, Android, and web from one codebase, with live multiplayer.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workReact Native DevelopmentQuote from the source page
ASL Flurry runs on iOS, Android, and web from one React Native codebase, with live multiplayer.
AppMakers USA offered suggestions for streamlining a site's UI, helped prioritize key features for a rebuild, and delivered a roadmap with clear milestones for Quantum Metric, with timely delivery.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workMobile App ModernizationQuote from the source page
App Makers USA offered insightful suggestions for streamlining the site's UI, helped prioritize key features for the rebuild, and delivered a comprehensive roadmap with clear milestones. The team's attention to detail, transparent communication, and timely delivery made them a reliable partner.
AppMakers USA built a live head-to-head multiplayer mode (ASL Match) for ASL Flurry using Pusher, including a custom reconnection and state-recovery layer with a server-authoritative score ledger so reconnecting players do not lose their scores.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
ASL Match lets two students compete live on sign recognition. Pusher handles the channel plumbing, but when one player is on LTE and another on spotty campus Wi-Fi, naive timestamps produce different winners. We built a custom reconnection and state-recovery layer that re-syncs game state on rejoin without losing either player's score.
AppMakersLA worked on an app to automatically generate cybersecurity tools based on client specifications, delivering a technical analysis and a roadmap for AI-driven tool selection, automated customization, and integration, on time and within budget.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workMobile Backend and API IntegrationQuote from the source page
The project with AppMakersLA focused on developing an app to automatically generate cybersecurity tools based on client specifications. They conducted a technical analysis and delivered a roadmap for AI-driven tool selection, automated customization, and integration with existing systems. The outcome was a clear development plan for a scalable solution that enhances security workflows through automation while maintaining compliance. AppMakersLA managed the project efficiently, staying on time and within budget, and provided valuable insights that combined technical depth with business practicality.
AppMakersLA rebuilt iPermit's platform; the page states the resulting platform powered exponential growth (3X in 2 years).
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes work2 yearsQuote from the source page
The result is an amazing, and continuously growing platform that has powered exponential growth (3X in 2 years) for iPermit.
AppMakersLA analyzed and rebuilt iPermit's website and internal process into a platform with an external client interface. The page reports 3X growth in 2 years.
Agency's own wordsappmakersla.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workin 2 yearsQuote from the source page
They came to us with a website that was 20 years old and asked us to analyze their entire process, break it down piece by piece, and rebuild it with 21st centry software to make their internal flow more efficient, and provide an external interface that is more beautiful and robust for their clients. The result is an amazing, and continuously growing platform that has powered exponential growth (3X in 2 years) for iPermit.
AppMakers USA revamped iPermit's portal and built CRM capabilities to improve customer communication and operational efficiency. The client described the platform as scalable and praised the team's ability to identify essential requirements and keep the project moving.
Independent sourceselectedfirms.coverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes work13-08-2026Quote from the source page
Revamped iPermit's portal and built CRM capabilities to improve customer communication and operational efficiency. The client described the platform as scalable and praised the project team's ability to identify essential requirements and keep the project moving.
Positions in every ranking28 rankings
28 positions: 28 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Development · Los Angeles | #1 of 31 | 64 | 4 (1 independent) | Confidence not rated yet | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| iOS App Development · Houston | #3 of 31 | 56 | 4 (1 independent) | Confidence not rated yet | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| iOS App Development · Miami | #3 of 31 | 56 | 4 (1 independent) | Confidence not rated yet | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| iOS App Development · Phoenix | #3 of 31 | 56 | 4 (1 independent) | Confidence not rated yet | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| iOS App Development · Chicago | #4 of 31 | 56 | 4 (1 independent) | Confidence not rated yet | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
23 more positionsHide the other 23
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Android App Development · Los Angeles | #3 of 30 | 59 | 3 (1 independent) | Confidence not rated yet | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Android App Development · Chicago | #3 of 30 | 51 | 3 (1 independent) | Confidence not rated yet | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Android App Development · Houston | #3 of 30 | 51 | 3 (1 independent) | Confidence not rated yet | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Android App Development · Miami | #4 of 30 | 51 | 3 (1 independent) | Confidence not rated yet | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Android App Development · Phoenix | #4 of 30 | 51 | 3 (1 independent) | Confidence not rated yet | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile MVP Development · Houstonon its own published cases | #4 of 25 | 47 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile MVP Development · Chicagoon its own published cases | #6 of 25 | 47 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile MVP Development · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #2 of 25 | 56 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile MVP Development · Miamion its own published cases | #4 of 25 | 47 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile MVP Development · Phoenixon its own published cases | #4 of 25 | 47 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| React Native Development · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #2 of 24 | 52 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| React Native Development · Houstonon its own published cases | #8 of 24 | 43 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| React Native Development · Chicagoon its own published cases | #10 of 24 | 43 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile App Modernization · Miamion its own published cases | #10 of 23 | 40 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| React Native Development · New Yorkon its own published cases | #13 of 24 | 43 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile App Modernization · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #6 of 23 | 49 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| React Native Development · Miamion its own published cases | #7 of 24 | 43 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| React Native Development · Phoenixon its own published cases | #7 of 24 | 43 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile App Modernization · Phoenixon its own published cases | #8 of 23 | 40 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile App Modernization · Chicagoon its own published cases | #9 of 23 | 40 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile App Modernization · Houstonon its own published cases | #9 of 23 | 40 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile Backend and API Integration · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #7 of 12 | 45 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
| Mobile Backend and API Integration · Phoenixon its own published cases | #41 of 65 | 37 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Market credibility 0 of 5 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Los Angeles, CA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Los Angeles, CA, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- enterprise, ecommerce, saas, educationVendar profile field
- Industries
- Fintech, Healthcare, Education, EnterpriseVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Anonymous, Executive at Moon Me Lover, Elisa Hoffman, ASL Flurry, iPermit, Customer Success Manager at iPermit, Social Media Manager at LA Sitters, StickSports, CFO at Bennys Educational ToysIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: iOS App Development $3,150 (5 of 31 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · Android App Development $2,650 (5 of 30 disclose) · iOS App Development $3,150 (5 of 31 disclose) · iOS App Development $3,150 (5 of 31 disclose) · iOS App Development $3,150 (5 of 31 disclose) · Android App Development $2,650 (5 of 30 disclose) · Android App Development $2,650 (5 of 30 disclose) · Android App Development $2,650 (5 of 30 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (2 of 25 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (2 of 25 disclose) · Mobile Backend and API Integration $8,500 (2 of 12 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $6,000 (5 of 23 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · Mobile Backend and API Integration $5,000 (8 of 65 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (2 of 25 disclose) · iOS App Development $3,150 (5 of 31 disclose) · Android App Development $2,650 (5 of 30 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (2 of 25 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (2 of 25 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $6,000 (5 of 23 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $6,000 (5 of 23 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $6,000 (5 of 23 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $6,000 (5 of 23 disclose)
Reputation
- Google5 · 80 reviews
- Trustpilot4.4 · 11 reviews
How it counts: 91 third-party reviews at 4.9. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2014Agency's own words
- Team size
- 60Agency's own words
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- Mobile DevelopmentVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedModerate confidence
- Confidence
- Moderate confidence, 78 of 100
- Evidence posture
- adequate: Usable as shortlist context: 4 of 39 documented work claims come from independent sources; check the sources before outreach.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Confidence not rated yet
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is High confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served20/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 6 cases with a named client and a result, 39 work claims30/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 2 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews15/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 4 of 39 work claims are independent8/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 39 confirmed, 0 partly, of 41 with a source24/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 5 of 520/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 39 of 4114/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Usable as shortlist context with a caveat: 4 of 39 documented work claims come from independent sources; the rest are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- 4 of 39 documented work claims come from independent sources; the rest are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Best position rests on: Confirmed by an independent source.
- 35 of 41 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 6 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (1 of 3)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (39 of 41)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (4 of 39 work claims)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Cite with the source context
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.