DevelopmentMobile DevelopmentChicagoReact Native Development
Chicago / React Native Development

Best React Native Development Companies in Chicago (2026)

24 agencies are ranked on documented react native development work: 8 based in or serving Chicago and 16 from other cities, marked as such; 0 confirmed by an independent source; payment does not affect the order.

Data as of November 3, 2026 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · How this ranking works ↓

Vendar ranks 24 Mobile Development agencies for react native development in Chicago, 8 of them local: the ones with documented react native development work on file. The top three by evidence-weighted score are Simpalm (54/100), Softaims (52) and Appingine (51). No paid placements; every position below cites its sources. 25 Chicago Mobile Development agencies have no react native development claim on file and are listed unranked.

The answer in three lines

Compare top 3
  1. 1Simpalm 54 · price not disclosed · clients 4.9/5 (10)3 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
  2. 2Softaims 52 · price not disclosed4 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
  3. 3Appingine 51 · price not disclosed · clients 3.8/5 (4)2 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site

Budget in Chicago: disclosed monthly floors run from $299, median $299; 2 of 24 disclose a price.

24 ranked agencies

BudgetSort
ForPays
1S

Simpalm

Chicago, IL, USA · team 51-200 · since 2009

HQ in Chicago · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.9/5 (10) Agency's own published cases

Simpalm built a React Native cross-platform app for CASSA, an advisory organization, enabling surveys, family communication, and community forums on a… (Agency's own words, simpalm.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

54/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
2
Softaims logo

Softaims

Chicago, USA · team 500+

HQ in Chicago · pricing not disclosed Agency's own published cases

…sync, adaptive payloads, and Hermes-optimized parsing with React Native, Hermes engine, SQLite, and Redux. Sync latency was reduced from 12 seconds to 180 milliseconds (-98.5% faster)… (Agency's own words, softaims.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

52/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
3
Appingine logo

Appingine

Chicago, USA · team 200+ · since 2005

HQ in Chicago · pricing not disclosed · clients 3.8/5 (4) Agency's own published cases

Appingine built Fitvate, a personalized workout and training app using React Native and Google Fit API, with 3.5M+ downloads globally, a 60% increase in… (Agency's own words, appingine.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

51/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
4
KodersPedia logo

KodersPedia

Chicago, IL, USA

HQ in Chicago · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.0/5 (40) Agency's own published cases

The portfolio lists a project named Wedstimate built with React Native and React. No outcome or result is stated for the project. (Agency's own words, koderspedia.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

50/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
5
BitsWits logo

BitsWits

Chicago, USA · team 100+ · since 2012

HQ in Chicago · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.1/5 (20) Agency's own published cases

…and booking features across a technology stack including React Native, Flutter, Swift, and AWS, so the results are not attributable to a single service. (Agency's own words, bitswits.co)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

50/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
6
Frenchy Digital logo

Frenchy Digital

Los Angeles, CA, USA · since 2016

national coverage · Projects from $20,000 · clients 3.8/5 (2) Agency's own published cases

Frenchy Digital built GoRun, a community-driven React Native running app with live event tracking, social challenges, and gamification, achieving a 65% 30-day retention rate versus a 25% industry average on iOS and Androi… (Agency's own words, frenchydigital.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

46/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
7
Digipie Technologies logo

Digipie Technologies

Chicago, IL, USA · team 20+ · since 2017

HQ in Chicago · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.8/5 (12) Agency's own published cases

Digipie's services page lists a HealthConnect telehealth app project with seamless video integration, built with React Native and WebRTC over 1.5 years. (Agency's own words, digipie.net)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

46/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
8
iQlance Solutions logo

iQlance Solutions

New York, NY, USA · team 51-200 · since 2010

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.7/5 (10) Agency's own published cases

iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB, taken from idea to launch in 8 months in Dallas… (Agency's own words, iqlance.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

45/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
9
Appluex logo

Appluex

Miami, USA

national coverage · From $299/month Agency's own published cases

Appluex built the Glitz mobile app as a React Native app with one codebase for iOS and Android, and a Node.js backend on AWS with MongoDB. (Agency's own words, appluex.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

44/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
10
AppMakersLA logo

AppMakersLA

Los Angeles, CA, USA · team 60 · since 2014

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.9/5 (91) Agency's own published cases

AppMakers USA built the ASL Flurry American Sign Language learning app for iOS, Android, and web from a single React Native Web codebase, with shared UI… (Agency's own words, appmakersla.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

43/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
133 more agencies considered without externally confirmed react native development work, 25 of them serving Chicago

This is an absence of evidence, not a quality rating.

One sourced claim moves an agency into the ranking.

No react native development claim on file yet. (104)

Sources on file say the vendor offers react native development; no case study or client review documents the work yet. (1)

Frequently asked questions (6)
How many Chicago Mobile Development agencies have documented react native development work?
8 of the 33 Mobile Development agencies Vendar tracks in Chicago have at least one react native development claim on file under the published rubric, and 16 more from other cities join the ranking with documented react native development work; 0 of the 24 ranked have an outside source naming it, and 0 have one that describes the work rather than listing the service. The other 25 Chicago agencies are listed unranked until evidence is added.
Which Chicago react native development agency fits my type of business?
By the clients named in their documented react native development work: Dental, medical and wellness: Frenchy Digital (#6), New York App Devs (#12) and Disrupt Labs (#16); Shops, restaurants and retail: iQlance Solutions (#8). This comes from client reviews and case studies on file, not from the agencies' own positioning; the number after each name is its place in the ranking.
What does react native development cost in Chicago?
Among the ranked agencies that disclose a monthly floor, retainers start at $299/month and the median floor is $299/month. 2 of 24 ranked agencies disclose some pricing signal.
Which of them are verified?
0 of 24 ranked agencies are verified. Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.
How is this list different from the Chicago Mobile Development page?
The Chicago Mobile Development page ranks every Mobile Development agency serving the city. This page keeps only the agencies with react native development evidence on file, scores them on the react native development query with the published model, and cites the claims behind every position. The model, its weights and the rubric are on the How we rank page.
When was this list updated?
Scores are recomputed from the profiles whenever a profile changes; the ranking model is version 2026.11.7.
All detailsThe full table, the rubric, the rules and the limits: the same data the machine feed serves for this ranking.Open ↓
D1Full ranking table24 ranked · click a column to sort
#AgencyScoreEvid./30Fit/25Capab./15Reliab./10Transp./10Reput./5Cred./5Pen.Conf.ClaimsVerified
1Simpalm5415.5198.27.22.52.61.3-20.83/0Not verified
2Softaims5216.515.512.232.53.41.3-20.84/0Not verified
3Appingine5113.51987.22.51.31.3-20.82/0Not verified
4KodersPedia5015.815.514.1303.20-20.86/0Not verified
5BitsWits5012198.57.22.52.70-20.82/0Not verified
6Frenchy Digital461313.38.57.250.90-20.82/0Not verified
7Digipie Technologies4681986.62.52.71.3-20.81/0Not verified
8iQlance Solutions451510.39.67.22.52.40-20.84/0Not verified
9Appluex441216.28.63501.3-20.82/0Not verified
10AppMakersLA431210.38.47.22.54.80-20.82/0Not verified
11TekRevol42815.97.962.53.20-20.81/0Not verified
12New York App Devs4117.510.310.5301.20-20.86/0Not verified
13JumpGrowth4115.96.810.262.51.70-20.87/0Not verified
14TechGropse411215.910301.21.3-20.82/0Not verified
15TechnBrains39146.88.77.203.31.3-20.83/0Not verified
16Disrupt Labs3815.56.8156000-50.85/0Not verified
17AppVerticals381310.38.4304.80-20.82/0Not verified
18Apptunix3711.210.38.932.53.10-20.84/0Not verified
19Sytepoint36810.38.47.22.501.3-20.81/0Not verified
20Go Tech Solutions351410.38.9300.80-20.83/0Not verified
21Vincit34126.88.1301.93.8-20.82/0Not verified
22Software Orca31126.88302.80-20.82/0Not verified
23Marotino29810.3832.51.90-50.81/0Not verified
24Los Angeles App Devs2486.811.33000-50.81/0Not verified

Pool 33 · ranked 24 · unranked 133 (28 with profile tags only) · verified 0 · pricing disclosed 2 · case studies on file 0 · an outside source names the work 0 · an outside document describes it 0

Claims: claims for this need in the feed / of them from a third party. Confidence is the number behind the High, Moderate and Lower labels; it never changes the order.

D1Breakdown per agencyPoints, facts, claims with weights and reviews behind every position
#1 Simpalm54/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 76 claims on file

Evidence for this query15.5/300.5173 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Simpalm built a React Native cross-platform app for CASSA, an advisory organization, enabling surveys, family communication, and community… (simpalm.com, claimed); Simpalm built a cross-platform React Native app for CASSA, an advisory organization, enabling surveys, family communication, and community… (simpalm.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in Chicago (Chicago, IL, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth8.2/150.54899999999999991 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 3 of 76 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2009; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 51-200; Process not documented
Reputation2.6/50.5110 third-party reviews at 4.9
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: a press mention per selectedfirms.co; Sources: selectedfirms.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Simpalm built a React Native cross-platform app for CASSA, an advisory organization, enabling surveys, family communication, and community forums on a single platform. 100+ families used the app within the first month of launch, and month-on-month user growth increased by 30%.

    Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Simpalm built a cross-platform React Native app for CASSA, an advisory organization, enabling surveys, family communication, and community forums on Android and iOS. 100+ families used the app within the first month of launch, and month-on-month user growth increased by 30%.

    Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Simpalm built Android and iOS apps for Collabri, a marketplace connecting service seekers and providers, using React Native. More than 200K jobs were completed in the MVP launch, and total jobs worth $10 million or more have been completed on the apps.

    Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 9 reviews; Trustpilot 3.7 from 1 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#2 Softaims52/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 16 claims on file

Evidence for this query16.5/300.554 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Softaims built a 16-week offline-first mobile architecture for Trucker Path, using delta sync, adaptive payloads, and Hermes-optimized… (softaims.com, claimed); Softaims engineered a 16-week offline-first mobile architecture for Trucker Path, using React Native, the Hermes engine, SQLite, Redux… (softaims.com, claimed)
Fit to this query15.5/250.62Headquartered in Chicago (Chicago, USA); Pricing not disclosed
Capability depth12.2/150.8131 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 4 of 16 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 500+; Process not documented
Reputation3.4/50.680999999999999922 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: an award per techreviewer.co; Sources: techreviewer.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Softaims built a 16-week offline-first mobile architecture for Trucker Path, using delta sync, adaptive payloads, and Hermes-optimized parsing with React Native, Hermes engine, SQLite, and Redux. Sync latency was reduced from 12 seconds to 180 milliseconds (-98.5% faster), with sub-200ms screen transitions.

    Agency's own words · softaims.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Softaims engineered a 16-week offline-first mobile architecture for Trucker Path, using React Native, the Hermes engine, SQLite, Redux, delta sync, and batch API gateways, delivering sub-200ms screen transitions on low-end Android devices. Sync latency was reduced from 12 seconds to 180 milliseconds (-98.5% faster).

    Agency's own words · softaims.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Softaims delivered a React Native branded checkout flow with Apple Pay/Google Pay integration, an AWS serverless backend, and privacy-first controls for Owner.com in a 16-week rollout. Checkout latency was reduced from 10 seconds to 800ms (-92 percent).

    Agency's own words · softaims.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Softaims delivered a React Native branded checkout flow for Owner.com, integrated Apple Pay and Google Pay, and implemented an AWS serverless backend. Checkout latency decreased from 10 seconds to 800ms (-92 percent).

    Agency's own words · softaims.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

#3 Appingine51/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 78 claims on file

Evidence for this query13.5/300.452 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Appingine built Fitvate, a personalized workout and training app using React Native and Google Fit API, with 3.5M+ downloads globally, a… (appingine.com, claimed); Appingine built the ALDI USA grocery app using React Native, Node.js and AWS, with 10M+ monthly active users on digital platforms, a 45%… (appingine.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in Chicago (Chicago, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names ecommerce clients
Capability depth8/150.5321 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 78 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2005; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 200+; Process not documented
Reputation1.3/50.2664 third-party reviews at 3.8
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: a press mention per selectedfirms.co; Sources: selectedfirms.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Appingine built Fitvate, a personalized workout and training app using React Native and Google Fit API, with 3.5M+ downloads globally, a 60% increase in daily active users, and a 4X boost in user engagement through gamification.

    Agency's own words · appingine.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Appingine built the ALDI USA grocery app using React Native, Node.js and AWS, with 10M+ monthly active users on digital platforms, a 45% increase in online orders, and a 30% faster checkout experience.

    Agency's own words · appingine.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 1 reviews; Trustpilot 3.4 from 3 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#4 KodersPedia50/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 17 claims on file

Evidence for this query15.8/300.5256 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 6 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; The portfolio lists a project named Wedstimate built with React Native and React. No outcome or result is stated for the project. (koderspedia.com, claimed); The portfolio lists a project named Vote America built with React and React Native. No outcome or result is stated for the project. (koderspedia.com, claimed)
Fit to this query15.5/250.62Headquartered in Chicago (Chicago, IL, USA); Pricing not disclosed
Capability depth14.1/150.9411 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 6 of 17 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency0/100Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation3.2/50.64540 third-party reviews at 4.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • The portfolio lists a project named Wedstimate built with React Native and React. No outcome or result is stated for the project.

    Agency's own words · koderspedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The portfolio lists a project named Vote America built with React and React Native. No outcome or result is stated for the project.

    Agency's own words · koderspedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The portfolio lists a project named Calm Now described as a mobile app built with React Native and React. No outcome or result is stated for the project.

    Agency's own words · koderspedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The page lists a portfolio entry for a client named Calm Now, labeled as a Mobile APP built with React Native and React. No outcome or result is stated for the project.

    Agency's own words · koderspedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • The page lists a portfolio entry for a client named Organic Produce Finder, labeled as a React Native project. No outcome or result is stated for the project.

    Agency's own words · koderspedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • The portfolio lists a mobile app named Calm Now built with React Native and React, but the page provides no client details or results for it.

    Agency's own words · koderspedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 4 reviews; Trustpilot 4 from 40 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#5 BitsWits50/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 38 claims on file

Evidence for this query12/300.42 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; BitsWits describes building VIFTY, a platform connecting service providers with consumers, as a multifaceted mobile app. The work combined… (bitswits.co, claimed); BitsWits built Soul Scribe, a digital diary app combining journaling with social interaction, with features including post management… (bitswits.co, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in Chicago (Chicago, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth8.5/150.56600000000000011 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 38 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2012; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 100+; Process not documented
Reputation2.7/50.54220 third-party reviews at 4.1
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • BitsWits describes building VIFTY, a platform connecting service providers with consumers, as a multifaceted mobile app. The work combined app development with social and booking features across a technology stack including React Native, Flutter, Swift, and AWS, so the results are not attributable to a single service.

    Agency's own words · bitswits.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • BitsWits built Soul Scribe, a digital diary app combining journaling with social interaction, with features including post management, in-app messaging, groups management, and privacy controls. The page lists technologies including React Native, Flutter, Swift, and AWS, so the specific platform used for the build is not attributable to one framework.

    Agency's own words · bitswits.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 1 reviews; Trustpilot 4 from 19 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#6 Frenchy Digital46/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · Projects from $20,000 · projects from $20,000 · 39 claims on file

Evidence for this query13/300.4332 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Frenchy Digital built GoRun, a community-driven React Native running app with live event tracking, social challenges, and gamification… (frenchydigital.com, claimed); Frenchy Digital built a React Native app for CGSA Mental Health Clinic, a Los Angeles mental health clinic, with end-to-end encryption… (frenchydigital.com, claimed)
Fit to this query13.3/250.53Serves Chicago from Los Angeles, CA, USA; no local office on file; Projects from $20,000; no monthly floor disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth8.5/150.5641 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 39 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2016; Retention not documented
Transparency5/100.5Pricing disclosed (Projects from $20,000); Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation0.9/50.1812 third-party reviews at 3.8
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Frenchy Digital built GoRun, a community-driven React Native running app with live event tracking, social challenges, and gamification, achieving a 65% 30-day retention rate versus a 25% industry average on iOS and Android.

    Agency's own words · frenchydigital.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 3, 2026

  • Frenchy Digital built a React Native app for CGSA Mental Health Clinic, a Los Angeles mental health clinic, with end-to-end encryption, secure messaging, teletherapy integration, and comprehensive patient management features.

    Agency's own words · frenchydigital.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 3, 2026

#7 Digipie Technologies46/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 37 claims on file

Evidence for this query8/300.2671 react native development claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Digipie's services page lists a HealthConnect telehealth app project with seamless video integration, built with React Native and WebRTC… (digipie.net, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in Chicago (Chicago, IL, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth8/150.5341 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 1 of 37 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability6.6/100.66In business since 2017; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 20+; Process not documented
Reputation2.7/50.53512 third-party reviews at 4.8
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: a certification per applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk; Sources: applytosupply.digitalmarketplace.service.gov.uk, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Digipie's services page lists a HealthConnect telehealth app project with seamless video integration, built with React Native and WebRTC over 1.5 years.

    Agency's own words · digipie.net · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 9 reviews; Trustpilot 4 from 3 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#8 iQlance Solutions45/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 36 claims on file

Evidence for this query15/300.54 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB, taken from… (iqlance.com, claimed); iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app; the page lists this project in Dallas, USA with an 8 months… (iqlance.com, claimed)
Fit to this query10.3/250.41Serves Chicago from New York, NY, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth9.6/150.6391 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 4 of 36 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2010; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 51-200; Process not documented
Reputation2.4/50.48910 third-party reviews at 4.7
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB, taken from idea to launch in 8 months in Dallas, USA.

    Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app; the page lists this project in Dallas, USA with an 8 months idea-to-launch timeline, built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB.

    Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app, for a client in Dallas, USA, built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS and Mongo DB and launched 8 months after the initial idea.

    Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • iQlance Solutions built a restaurant app for a client in Houston, USA, using .Net, SQL Server and React Native, launched 10 weeks after the initial idea.

    Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 7 reviews; Trustpilot 4 from 3 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#9 Appluex44/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $299/month · hourly $150 an hour · 34 claims on file

Evidence for this query12/300.42 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Appluex built the Glitz mobile app as a React Native app with one codebase for iOS and Android, and a Node.js backend on AWS with MongoDB. (appluex.com, claimed); Appluex built the Glitz mobile app in React Native, using one codebase for both iOS and Android. (appluex.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Chicago from Miami, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $299/month, inside the react native development band; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth8.6/150.5741 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 34 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency5/100.5Pricing disclosed (From $299/month); Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: an award per techreviewer.co; Sources: techreviewer.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Appluex built the Glitz mobile app as a React Native app with one codebase for iOS and Android, and a Node.js backend on AWS with MongoDB.

    Agency's own words · appluex.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Appluex built the Glitz mobile app in React Native, using one codebase for both iOS and Android.

    Agency's own words · appluex.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

#10 AppMakersLA43/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 42 claims on file

Evidence for this query12/300.42 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; AppMakers USA built the ASL Flurry American Sign Language learning app for iOS, Android, and web from a single React Native Web codebase… (appmakersla.com, claimed); AppMakers USA built ASL Flurry as a React Native app running on iOS, Android, and web from one codebase, with live multiplayer. (appmakersla.com, claimed)
Fit to this query10.3/250.41Serves Chicago from Los Angeles, CA, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names enterprise clients
Capability depth8.4/150.561 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 42 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2014; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 60; Process not documented
Reputation4.8/50.962000000000000191 third-party reviews at 4.9
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • AppMakers USA built the ASL Flurry American Sign Language learning app for iOS, Android, and web from a single React Native Web codebase, with shared UI and business logic and thin native adapters per platform.

    Agency's own words · appmakersla.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • AppMakers USA built ASL Flurry as a React Native app running on iOS, Android, and web from one codebase, with live multiplayer.

    Agency's own words · appmakersla.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 80 reviews; Trustpilot 4.4 from 11 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Positions 11 to 24: the same breakdown is on each agency's profile, linked from the table above, and in the machine-readable version below.

D2What counts as evidence for this questionRubric 2026.11

A claim counts as React Native evidence when a source on file names an app the company built, rebuilt or maintains in React Native or Expo, ideally with the client and the platforms it shipped on. A technology listed on the company's services page without a project does not count.

Terms that count:
react native, expo
Minimum to be ranked:
1 claim on file under this rubric, of which 1 from a source outside Vendar.
Budget band:
no budget band for this question

In plain words: a case counts when it names react native development work and where it was published can be checked.

D3Eligibility and orderWho is admitted, how ties break, what payment does

Ranked vendors have at least 1 claim on file that supports react native development under the published rubric, of which at least 1 comes from a source outside Vendar; the rest are listed unranked.

  • The vendor lists the page's service on its profile.
  • The vendor serves the page's market: headquarters or a listed service region in the city. When a need page has fewer than ten ranked vendors from the city, agencies from other cities join it only if they are headquartered in the same state or have published work (a case study, a project, a client review) that names the city or its state. A line saying a company serves the whole country is not enough. They are ranked by the same score, geography counts 0.3 for them, and each position says where the agency works from. Mobile development is bought remotely, so its city pages take agencies from anywhere in the United States under the same condition: documented work for the need. The same holds for SEO needs bought remotely: international, enterprise, consulting, recovery, marketplaces, startups, B2B SaaS, ecommerce, AI search visibility, audits, technical and content-led SEO. Local SEO, small business, lead generation and high-ticket services stay with agencies from the city and its state.
  • A need page that still has fewer than ten ranked agencies after that is filled from the city's own agencies whose sources say they offer the need but document no project for it yet. They always stand below every agency with documented work, are labelled "Offers this service; no documented project on file yet", carry lower confidence, and do not count toward the threshold that opens a page to search engines.
  • For an intent page, at least one claim on file supports the intent under the page's rubric, and at least one of those claims comes from a source outside Vendar. Our own service listings and profile tags describe the intent but document nothing, so they add weight to a vendor that already has outside evidence and never earn a rank on their own. Vendors without outside evidence appear below the ranking, unranked, never padded into it.
  • For an intent page, at least one of those claims documents work the vendor has done: a case study, a project or portfolio entry, or a client review. Service pages, price lists, positioning statements and directory listings say what a vendor offers, not what it did; they add weight to a vendor that already has documented work and never earn a documented position. They can only fill a page that is short of ten, below every documented position and labelled as such (see below).
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site. It is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" until an independent source documents the same kind of work.
  • Filtered views (an entry price, a pricing model, a team size) are not rankings of their own: they show agencies ranked for at least one need in the city, each with the score of its best need, and keep only those that meet the condition. An agency that does not publish the fact is listed below with the reason.
  • Draft and needs-data profiles are never listed.
  • Rank order is the score, highest first. Ties break on evidence points, then on the number of third-party claims, then alphabetically.
  • There is no hidden ordering: no hand-curated slug lists and no paid boost in the sort on any listing.
  • If an editor overrides a position, the position is labelled as an editorial placement with a written reason and ordering_basis set to editorial. No such placements exist on evidence-ranked pages today.
  • Every ranked position explains itself from its score components and cites the claims behind them, with their sources.
  • Sort: score_out_of_100, highest first; ties break on evidence points, then third-party claim count, then name.
  • Payment: Paid visibility never changes the order of a listing.
  • Top-list threshold: An intent page is offered to search engines when its ranked list has at least five evidence-backed vendors (three when the city has fewer than twenty vendors for the service). Only agencies from the city itself (headquarters or a listed service region) with documented work count toward it: agencies filled in from other cities and agencies that only offer the need do not. A page whose list rests mostly on agencies from other cities is titled “agencies serving” the city instead of “best agencies in” it, says how many are local, stays on the city page and in its feed, and is kept out of search engines until enough local agencies document the work; otherwise the same national list would stand behind six city pages. Below the threshold even with outside agencies the page stays published with noindex, keeps its URL, links and feed, and is left out of the city page's list of rankings. A page whose top ten repeats 70% or more of another need's top ten in the same city, or has the same top three, also stays noindex while the stronger of the two is offered; it opens when the lists differ. The same holds across cities: of the pages for one need whose top tens share 70% or more, only the one with the most local agencies is offered to search engines.

Weights: Evidence for this query 30 · Fit to this query 25 · Capability depth 15 · Reliability 10 · Transparency 10 · Reputation 5 · Market credibility 5. Penalties: Profile flagged for review -5 · Evidence not re-checked in 18 months -5 · No independent source on file -3 · Profile below decision-ready status -2.

D4How claims are counted
  • Paid agency directories that sell placement are not a source. Their reviews are not cited, never support a position and do not count toward reputation; a profile may show how many reviews such directories hold as one unnamed figure, for context only. Ratings come from open review platforms: Google, Trustpilot and BBB.
  • Provenance is recorded per claim: third_party, first_party, internal (a Vendar profile field) or unknown.
  • Verification status is recorded per claim: verified, claimed, internal_signal or unverified.
  • Every record on file has a role: a claim states a fact; a source reference is a link without a statement (an official site, a directory profile); a research note is Vendar's own remark. Only claims count as evidence. A source reference never earns weight, however its title reads, and a research note never reaches a page or a feed.
  • Every claim with a source URL is checked against that page by an AI reader and the result is recorded: confirmed, partly confirmed, not supported, or page unreachable. A claim the page does not support stops counting toward any position until a later check confirms it; a claim whose page cannot be read still counts and says so.
  • Third-party claims outweigh first-party claims; profile fields are the weakest signal and are labelled as such.
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site; such a position is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" on the listing, the profile and the feed (evidence_basis: own_published) until an independent source documents the same kind of work. Its confidence is at most moderate.
  • In the ranking, who is speaking is decided by the source address: the vendor's own site and platforms where the vendor publishes about itself (platform partner directories and portals, case-study hosting sites, paid release wires) are the vendor's own word, not an independent source, whatever domain they sit on. Client reviews on a partner directory stay third-party.
  • On the profile and in its feed the rule is stricter: who is speaking is decided by who wrote the text. Every claim falls into one of four classes: independent (a client, the press, a rating written by a third party); linked to the agency (a person who worked at or through it, writing in the first person); a listing the agency writes (the platforms above, or another page retelling what the agency says); and the agency itself. Only the first class counts as independent there (section 18).
  • A claim counts for an intent only when the rubric's terms appear in the claim or its source. The rubric is published on the page.
  • Claims that only describe the company's location or history are not intent evidence.
  • Each claim is marked by whether it documents work (describes_work in the machine feed): case studies, projects, portfolio entries and client reviews do; service pages, pricing, positioning statements, review-platform profiles and employer reviews do not.
  • Claims from the same source count with diminishing weight: each further claim adds half as much as the one before it. Everything an agency says about itself, on any page, is one source; outside documents are told apart by the site that published them. The number of reviews on one platform, or of pages on an agency's own site, cannot carry a position.
  • Evidence documented on two or more different independent sites earns a small bonus over the same amount of evidence from one site.
  • Review platforms that compete with Vendar stay in the machine feed with their source URL, because a claim must be checkable, but pages do not name or link them; where other sources exist, they are listed first.

Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.

D5Dates and versions
Data as of
Nov 3, 2026
Newest evidence check
Nov 3, 2026
Feed generated
Nov 4, 2026
Ranking model
Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
Rubric
React Native Development 2026.11
Update cadence
Fast signals, monthly: licence status, site alive, review rating and count, pricing pages, team page. Evidence, each base cycle: case studies, portfolio, services, client types, press and awards. Full re-verification, yearly: registry, address, ownership, every claim a rank rests on. Event-driven, within days: a vendor update, a buyer report, a dead link, a regulator record, a dispute.
Next evidence pass due by
Feb 1, 2027

Every date shown is a data date. A listing's updated date is the newest verification date among its ranked vendors and the evidence claims their ranks rest on; the same value appears in the page text, the structured data and the machine feed.

D6Known limits of the method

A position reflects documented work for the page's question, not the quality of an agency as such. Without a public case or a visible campaign the result of an agency's work cannot be known from outside. An agency with no public evidence is not worse: there is nothing to confirm it with, so it is listed below the ranking instead of being ranked low.

  • About 20 of 100 points rest on what the vendor says about itself without an outside check: years in business, team size, retention, prices.
  • The weights favour older, larger and local vendors: full marks at ten years and around 100 reviews, awards count toward market credibility, a vendor that works remotely gets 0.3 on geography, an undisclosed price gets 0.2.
  • The weights 30/25/15/10/10/5/5 are set by judgment and are not yet calibrated on client outcomes.
  • Reviews on directories are often collected by the agency itself.
  • The ranking decides who is speaking by the source address only: a person who worked at or through the agency writing on their own site, or a third-party page retelling what the agency says, still counts as third-party in a position. The profile and its feed already count them as the agency's word, so a position can show more third-party claims than the profile shows independent ones.
  • Market credibility counts recognition with a source on file, including recognition the vendor reports about itself.
  • Claims are checked by AI models, not by people. Code confirms that the quoted words are on the page; it cannot confirm that the page itself tells the truth. A case study on an agency's own site stays the agency's word even when the check confirms it.
  • Confidence is shown next to the score and does not change the order.
D7Machine-readable version

This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.

/ai/listings/development/mobile-development/chicago/react-native-development

Schema vendar.ai.decision.v1 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · generated Nov 4, 2026 · methodology /scoring