Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 6 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #12 iOS App Development in New York, of 12 · also in 11 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
Nothing on file says who this agency suits: no client types, industries or reviews to read it from.
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 6 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for an iOS App Development case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #10 AOX Apps40Ranks above on this question#10#12 this oneScore4039Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #11 Apptunix40Ranks above on this question#11#12 this oneScore4039Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for SFCD.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#12 iOS App Development in New York: 39/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 13 | 43% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.5 | 62% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 12.9 | 86% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed6 of 6 on file · 0 of 6 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 6 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 6. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 2 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: iOS App Development 2 · Android App Development 1. The full ledger of 6 is on the proof page.
SFCD designed a new iPhone app for SmackHigh in 5 weeks. SmackHigh is described as a community for high school students with over 800,000 users.
Agency's own wordssfcd.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workiOS App DevelopmentQuote from the source page
We joined forces with SmackHigh, a community for high school students with over 800,000 users, to design a brand new iPhone app in just 5 weeks.
SFCD collaborated with Extensis to build an iOS app for creating animated font collages. The app was featured in Fast Company, DesignTAXI, and Brit + Co.
Agency's own wordssfcd.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workiOS App DevelopmentQuote from the source page
Extensis collaborated with us to build an iOS app for creating animated font collages, which was featured in Fast Company, DesignTAXI, and Brit + Co.
SFCD designed and developed Spinrilla's Android app, which was approaching 5 million downloads when the page was written.
Agency's own wordssfcd.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workAndroid App DevelopmentQuote from the source page
Spinrilla, the internet’s top source for free hip-hop mixtapes, teamed up with us to design and develop their Android app, which is now approaching 5 million downloads.
SFCD designed, developed, tested and shipped an app to Amplify in six months.
Agency's own wordssfcd.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin just six monthsQuote from the source page
We designed, developed, tested and shipped the app to Amplify in just six months.
SFCD helped Tipster build an app providing personalized style advice from industry experts and tastemakers. The work included UI/UX design, app development, brand identity, and a website.
Agency's own wordssfcd.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
We helped Tipster build an app that provides personalized style advice from industry experts and tastemakers.
SFCD designed mobile apps for iOS and Android for Yota to establish a digital communication channel with its customers.
Agency's own wordssfcd.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Yota hired us to design mobile apps for iOS and Android to establish a digital communication channel with their customers.
Positions in every ranking12 rankings
12 positions: 12 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Development · New Yorkon its own published cases | #12 of 12 | 39 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| iOS App Development · Miamion its own published cases | #21 of 31 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| iOS App Development · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #24 of 31 | 31 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| iOS App Development · Phoenixon its own published cases | #24 of 31 | 31 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| iOS App Development · Houstonon its own published cases | #26 of 31 | 31 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
7 more positionsHide the other 7
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iOS App Development · Chicagoon its own published cases | #23 of 31 | 31 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Android App Development · New Yorkon its own published cases | #13 of 13 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Android App Development · Miamion its own published cases | #29 of 30 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Android App Development · Chicagoon its own published cases | #30 of 30 | 23 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Android App Development · Houstonon its own published cases | #30 of 30 | 23 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Android App Development · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #30 of 30 | 23 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Android App Development · Phoenixon its own published cases | #30 of 30 | 23 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- New York, NY, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Miami, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- not statedVendar profile field
- Industries
- not statedVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- SmackHigh, Extensis, Spinrilla, Amplify, Tipster, YotaIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: iOS App Development n/a (0 of 12 disclose) · Android App Development n/a (0 of 13 disclose) · iOS App Development $3,150 (5 of 31 disclose) · iOS App Development $3,150 (5 of 31 disclose) · iOS App Development $3,150 (5 of 31 disclose) · iOS App Development $3,150 (5 of 31 disclose) · Android App Development $2,650 (5 of 30 disclose) · Android App Development $2,650 (5 of 30 disclose) · Android App Development $2,650 (5 of 30 disclose) · Android App Development $2,650 (5 of 30 disclose) · iOS App Development $3,150 (5 of 31 disclose) · Android App Development $2,650 (5 of 30 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- Mobile DevelopmentVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types: industries, client types5/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 1 cases with a named client and a result, 6 work claims10/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 6 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 6 confirmed, 0 partly, of 6 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 1 of 120/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 6 of 615/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names iOS app development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 6 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 6 of 6 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 6 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (2 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Feed
- /ai/vendors/sfcd
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.